note-improvement

$npx mdskill add tobihagemann/turbo/note-improvement

Capture out-of-scope improvement ideas for later action.

  • Saves improvement ideas that fall outside the current task scope.
  • Depends on file system access to write .turbo/improvements.md.
  • Determines improvement type and category from context or arguments.
  • Appends structured improvement entries to a project-level backlog file.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/note-improvementView on GitHub ↗
---
name: note-improvement
description: "Capture an out-of-scope improvement opportunity so it doesn't get lost. Use when the user asks to \"note improvement\", \"save improvement\", \"track this for later\", \"remember this improvement\", \"note this idea\", \"log improvement\", \"backlog this\", or \"park this idea\". Also invoke proactively when noticing something improvable during work that falls outside the current task's scope — briefly mention it to the user and offer to note it."
---

# Note Improvement

Capture improvement opportunities discovered during work so they don't get silently dropped. Appends to a project-level `.turbo/improvements.md` file that serves as a backlog of actionable ideas.

## Step 1: Determine Project Root

Find the nearest `.git` directory or project root. The improvements file lives at `.turbo/improvements.md` relative to the project root.

## Step 2: Identify the Improvement

Gather from context or `$ARGUMENTS`:

- **What**: One-line summary of the improvement
- **Type**: One of `direct`, `investigate`, or `plan` — see criteria below
- **Category**: One of `refactor`, `performance`, `reliability`, `readability`, `testing`, `docs`, `dx` (developer experience), or `feature`
- **Where**: File path(s) and/or area of the codebase affected
- **Why**: Brief rationale — what's the benefit?

### Type criteria

- **direct** — Clear scope and a known approach, ready to apply via `/implement`.
- **investigate** — A symptom that needs root-cause analysis first: unclear root cause, performance question, intermittent bug, "something feels off".
- **plan** — Everything else: the approach warrants writing down before implementing (multi-file refactor, test additions, feature work).

When the criteria above clearly select one value, use it. Otherwise, use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm; default to `plan` if the user declines to choose.

## Step 3: Append to File

Read `.turbo/improvements.md` if it exists. Create it with the header below if it doesn't.

**File header** (only when creating new):

```markdown
# Improvements

Out-of-scope improvement opportunities captured during work sessions. Review periodically and pull items into active work when appropriate.
```

**Entry format:**

```markdown
### <one-line summary>

- **Type**: <direct | investigate | plan>
- **Category**: <category>
- **Where**: `<file path or area>`
- **Why**: <brief rationale>
- **Noted**: <YYYY-MM-DD>
```

Append the new entry at the end of the file.

## Step 4: Confirm

Tell the user the improvement was noted and where the file is.

## Rules

- Deduplicate before appending: check for a similar entry and update it in place when one exists. When the existing entry predates the Type field, add a Type line while updating.
- When updating an existing entry tagged with the legacy values `trivial` or `standard`, rewrite the Type to `direct` or `plan` respectively so the file converges on current vocabulary.
- Keep entries concise — 3-5 lines max per entry. These are backlog items, not specs.
- Record only; leave action to the user, who decides when to address it.
- When the project has no `.turbo/` directory, use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm the location before creating one.

More from tobihagemann/turbo

SkillDescription
answer-reviewer-questionsFor each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to \"answer reviewer questions\", \"draft answers to PR questions\", or \"explain reviewer questions\".
apply-findingsApply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to \"apply findings\", \"apply fixes\", \"apply suggestions\", \"apply accepted findings\", \"fix the findings\", or \"apply the review results\".
assess-technical-debtAssess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to \"assess technical debt\", \"find technical debt\", \"review technical debt\", \"what should we refactor\", \"find refactoring candidates\", \"where is the code rot\", or \"what's our worst code\". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
changelog-rulesShared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
claude-printRun a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to \"claude print\", \"ask claude\", \"run claude\", \"consult claude\", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.
code-styleEnforce mirror, reuse, and symmetry principles to keep new code consistent with surrounding code. Use when writing new code in an existing codebase, adding new features, refactoring, or making any code changes.
codex-execRun autonomous task execution using the codex CLI. Use when the user asks to \"codex exec\", \"run codex exec\", \"execute a task with codex\", or \"delegate to codex\".
commit-rulesShared commit message rules and technical constraints referenced by /stage-commit and /commit-staged. Not typically invoked directly.
commit-staged-pushCommit already-staged changes and push in one step. Use when the user asks to \"commit and push staged changes\", \"commit and push what's staged\", or \"commit staged and push\".
consult-claudeConsult Claude Code for second opinions, brainstorming, or difficult debugging from Codex. Use when the user asks to \"consult claude\", \"ask claude\", \"get claude's opinion\", \"brainstorm with claude\", or \"discuss with claude\".