normalize-format

$npx mdskill add lyndonkl/claude/normalize-format

Converts diverse inbox formats into clean markdown with metadata.

  • Enables ingestion of Claude exports, transcripts, and highlights.
  • Strips timestamps and separates URLs from commentary text.
  • Generates unique IDs and word counts for downstream processing.
  • Outputs standardized markdown ready for librarian indexing.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/normalize-formatView on GitHub ↗
---
name: normalize-format
description: Normalizes a single inbox file of any supported format (plain markdown, Claude.ai JSON export, Claude Code JSONL session, Readwise markdown/CSV highlight, transcript with timestamps or speaker labels, link capture) into a clean markdown body plus partial frontmatter (id, title, source block, word_count). Handles format-specific failure modes — JSON content-block arrays, timestamp stripping, per-highlight chunking, URL-vs-commentary separation. Use when ingesting any inbox item for the substacker Librarian. Trigger keywords: normalize, convert, parse, transcript, export, JSON, JSONL, highlight, CSV.
---

# Normalize Format

## Table of Contents

- [Supported formats](#supported-formats)
- [Workflow](#workflow)
- [Detection heuristics](#detection-heuristics)
- [Worked example](#worked-example)
- [Guardrails](#guardrails)

**Related skills:** Called by `ingest-inbox-item` as step 1. Upstream of `tag-by-topic`, `score-intuition-density`, `dedupe-against-corpus`.

## Supported formats

| Extension | Format | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `.md`, `.txt` | plain markdown | Default; passes through |
| `.json` | Claude.ai export | Conversation with messages array |
| `.jsonl` | Claude Code session | Content-block array per response |
| `.md` (Readwise-shaped) | Readwise export | Highlights + user notes |
| `.csv` | Readwise CSV | Per-row highlight |
| `.vtt`, `.srt`, `.md` (diarized) | Transcript | May include timestamps + speaker labels |
| `.md` with URL + commentary | Link capture | User's framing is the signal |

## Workflow

```
Normalize one file:
- [ ] Step 1: Detect format by extension + first-line sniff
- [ ] Step 2: Apply format-specific parse
- [ ] Step 3: Split long transcripts at topic boundaries (>3000 words)
- [ ] Step 4: Emit [{body, partial_frontmatter}, ...] list (usually one item)
```

### Step 1: Detection

- `.jsonl` with `"type":"assistant"` → Claude Code session.
- `.json` with `"conversation"` / `"messages"` top-level key → Claude.ai export.
- `.md` starting with `# ` and Readwise boilerplate (`**Highlights first synced by Readwise...**`) → Readwise.
- `.vtt` / `.srt`, or `.md` with `[HH:MM:SS]` timestamp pattern, or lines prefixed with speaker labels like `Me:` → transcript.
- `.md` with ≤50 words and a prominent URL → link capture.
- Else: plain markdown.

### Step 2: Format-specific parse

**Plain markdown**: pass body through unchanged. Title = first H1 or filename-derived.

**Claude.ai JSON**: flatten content blocks to markdown. Preserve user/assistant turn labels (`**Me:**` / `**Claude:**`). Strip system-reminder blocks. `provenance.author: claude`, `confidence: paraphrased`.

**Claude Code JSONL**: flatten content-block array. Drop `tool_use` blocks unless the adjacent user message references the tool output. Strip system reminders.

**Readwise**: split per-book file into one seed per highlight. Body = highlight + user note. Boilerplate stripped. For bare highlights (no user note), set `provenance.confidence: quoted`, density capped at 3 downstream. For user-annotated highlights, `confidence: owned`.

**Transcript**: strip timestamps. Preserve speaker labels as `**Speaker:**` prefixes. If >3000 words, split at topic shifts — emit multiple outputs sharing `parent_source`. Target ~1500 words per chunk.

**Link capture**: separate URL from commentary. Body = user's commentary. Frontmatter adds `source.linked_url`. If <50 words of commentary, flag `low_commentary: true` so the scorer caps density.

### Step 3: Split long transcripts

Split heuristic: paragraph break + topic-vocabulary shift (measured by tag overlap drop across adjacent paragraphs). Each chunk ~1500 words. Preserve `parent_source` across chunks.

## Detection heuristics

- A file that looks like a transcript but is actually an email thread (first-line sniff: `From: ...`, `Date: ...`, `Subject: ...`) — reclassify as plain markdown or link capture.
- A Readwise file missing boilerplate — treat as plain markdown.
- A `.json` file that isn't a Claude export — treat as plain markdown and wrap in code fences.

## Worked example

**Input** (`inbox/2026-04-21-claude-bnn.json`):
```json
{"conversation":{"name":"BNN variational","messages":[
  {"role":"user","content":[{"type":"text","text":"help me intuit why variational inference..."}]},
  {"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Think of it as fitting a simple distribution..."}]}
]}}
```

**Output**:
```markdown
# BNN variational

**Me:** help me intuit why variational inference...

**Claude:** Think of it as fitting a simple distribution...
```

With `partial_frontmatter = {id: 2026-04-21-bnn-variational, title: "BNN variational", source: {type: claude-conversation, ...}, provenance: {author: claude, confidence: paraphrased}}`.

## Guardrails

1. Readwise CSV with malformed rows: skip the row, log `WARN | malformed CSV row in <file> line N` to changelog.
2. Claude.ai JSON schema drift: if `messages` key missing, fall back to recursive text extraction; mark `confidence: paraphrased` regardless.
3. Transcript that is actually an email thread: reclassify rather than keep as transcript.
4. Never OCR images. Image-only inbox items get a seed body of `[image: awaiting user annotation]` and `status: dead` with reason `image-only`.
5. Files >50k words: refuse and log. User splits manually.
6. Never lose the original. Even if parsing fails, the inbox file stays intact (caller moves to `.processed/` only on success).

## Quick reference

- Seven supported formats, each with a specific parser.
- Returns `[{body, partial_frontmatter}, ...]` — always a list, usually of length 1.
- Long transcripts split into multiple outputs sharing `parent_source`.

More from lyndonkl/claude

SkillDescription
abstraction-concrete-examplesBuilds structured abstraction ladders that translate high-level principles into concrete, actionable examples across 3-5 levels. Bridges communication gaps, reveals hidden assumptions, and tests whether abstract ideas work in practice. Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps.
academic-letter-architectGuides the creation of evidence-based academic recommendation letters, reference letters, and award nominations that combine concrete examples, meaningful comparisons, and genuine enthusiasm. Use when writing recommendation letters for students, postdocs, or colleagues, or when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy and comparative statements.
adr-architectureDocuments significant architectural and technical decisions with full context, alternatives considered, trade-offs analyzed, and consequences understood. Creates a decision trail that helps teams understand why decisions were made. Use when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, establishing standards, migrating systems, or when user mentions ADR, architecture decision, technical decision record, or decision documentation.
adverse-selection-priorProduces a Bayesian prior probability that an offered transaction is +EV for the recipient, given that the counterparty chose to propose it. Applies Akerlof market-for-lemons logic -- if they offered it, they believe it is +EV for them, so the prior that it is +EV for us is materially below 50%. Reusable across trade evaluation, waiver drops (another team dropping a player is also adverse selection), job-offer analysis, M&A, and any "someone offered me this" situation. Use when you receive an unsolicited trade/offer/proposal, analyzing incoming trade prior, evaluating why a counterparty proposed a deal, or when user mentions adverse selection, market for lemons, why did they offer this, incoming trade prior, they proposed it, Bayesian adjustment on received offer.
alignment-values-north-starCreates actionable alignment frameworks that give teams a shared North Star (direction), values (guardrails), and decision tenets (behavioral standards). Enables autonomous decision-making while maintaining organizational coherence. Use when starting new teams, scaling organizations, defining culture, establishing product vision, resolving misalignment, creating strategic clarity, or when user mentions North Star, team values, mission, principles, guardrails, decision framework, or cultural alignment.
analogy-weight-checkFor every analogy in a substacker draft, verifies it carries mechanical weight — the analogy does real work explaining the mechanism, not merely decorates it. Cross-references analogy-catalog.md for novelty (is this analogy reused from a prior post?) and domain fit (biology > organizational > sports preferred; physics/military disfavored). Use whenever an analogy appears in the draft. Trigger keywords: analogy weight, decorative, mechanical weight, reused analogy, catalog check, metaphor check.
answer-uncomfortable-questionTakes one strategic question about substacker ("should we launch paid?", "is this section dead?", "are we writing for the wrong audience?") and produces the mandatory evidence + reasoning + downside triad plus a recommendation. Used 3 times per Growth Strategist review. Trigger keywords: uncomfortable question, strategic question, evidence reasoning downside, triad.
attribute-performanceFor each substacker post that materially over- or under-performs the rolling baseline (|z| ≥ 1.0), produces a plain-English attribution paragraph with calibrated confidence (high / medium / low / unexplained). Considers subject-line effect, topic zeitgeist, external share, day-of-week, length effect, and audience-notes signals. Labels unexplained outliers explicitly rather than fabricating a story. Use after compute-baseline when outlier posts exist. Trigger keywords: attribution, why did this post work, outlier explanation, performance analysis.
auction-first-price-shadingComputes the optimal shaded bid for a first-price sealed-bid auction given a true private value, an estimate of the number of competing bidders N, and a value-distribution assumption. Implements the `(N-1)/N` equilibrium shading rule for uniform private values, adjusts for log-normal or empirical value distributions, layers a risk-aversion adjustment, and caps output against the bidder's remaining budget. Domain-neutral auction theory reusable across fantasy sports (baseball FAAB, NBA/NHL waiver auctions), prediction-market limit sizing, sealed procurement bids, and any blind-bid context. Use when user mentions "first-price auction bid", "sealed bid shading", "(N-1)/N", "FAAB bid amount", "auction shading", "optimal bid first-price", "bid for sealed-bid", "blind bid sizing", or when downstream logic needs a principled shade factor rather than an ad-hoc heuristic.
auction-winners-curse-haircutApplies a Bayesian haircut to a bid valuation for common-value auctions where winning is itself evidence the bidder over-estimated. Takes a raw valuation, a value-type classification (common_value / private_value / mixed), the number of informed bidders N, and a signal-dispersion estimate, and returns an adjusted valuation. Domain-neutral and reusable across fantasy FAAB, prediction markets, M&A bids, ad-auction budgets, and any generic bidding context. Use when user mentions "winner's curse", "common value auction", "valuation haircut", "adverse valuation", "Bayesian bid adjustment", or "over-paying in auction".