mlb-regression-flagger

$npx mdskill add lyndonkl/claude/mlb-regression-flagger

Calculate regression indices to spot over- or under-performing players.

  • Helps users identify buy-low or sell-high candidates for trades.
  • Depends on Baseball Savant and FanGraphs data sources.
  • Recommends actions by comparing surface stats to underlying metrics.
  • Outputs a regression index score ranging from negative to positive.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/mlb-regression-flaggerView on GitHub ↗
---
name: mlb-regression-flagger
description: Identifies fantasy baseball players whose surface stats (wOBA, ERA, batting average) are diverging from their underlying Statcast quality (xwOBA, FIP, xBA) — emits a `regression_index` from -100 (very lucky, sell high) to +100 (very unlucky, buy low). Primary signal for buy-low/sell-high decisions on trades and waivers. Use when user mentions "buy low", "sell high", "regression candidate", "lucky", "unlucky", "xwOBA gap", "ERA-FIP gap", "BABIP", "due for regression", or is deciding whether to trade for / trade away a player based on over- or under-performance.
---
# MLB Regression Flagger

## Table of Contents
- [Example](#example)
- [Workflow](#workflow)
- [Common Patterns](#common-patterns)
- [Guardrails](#guardrails)
- [Quick Reference](#quick-reference)

## Example

**Scenario**: User asks "Is Junior Caminero a buy-low candidate or am I chasing noise?"

**Raw data gathered from Baseball Savant + FanGraphs (cite URLs)**:
- Caminero 2026 wOBA: .310 (actual results)
- Caminero 2026 xwOBA: .380 (expected based on exit velocity + launch angle)
- BABIP: .255 (well below .300 league mean)
- Barrel %: 14.2% (elite, 90th percentile)
- Hard-Hit %: 52% (elite)

**Regression index calculation**:
```
regression_index = (xwOBA - wOBA) x 500
                 = (.380 - .310) x 500
                 = +35
```

**Secondary check — BABIP**: .255 is below the .240 lower-outlier threshold for hitters only if we tighten further, but .255 plus elite contact quality confirms unlucky. Not a "will correct to .300" player, but unlikely to stay at .255 given the batted-ball profile.

**Verdict**: `regression_index = +35` → **BUY**. Caminero has been unlucky; underlying contact quality is elite. Expect his surface stats to catch up over the next 30 days.

**User-facing translation** (per CLAUDE.md rule #5 — beginner writing):
> "Junior Caminero's raw numbers look mediocre (.310 wOBA — that's a catch-all hitting stat), but the quality of his actual contact (how hard and at what angle he hits the ball) suggests he should be hitting .380. The gap is one of the biggest in the league. ADD if available, or OFFER a trade for him before his stats correct."

**Signal file emission** (per signal-framework.md):
```yaml
---
type: regression
date: 2026-04-17
emitted_by: mlb-regression-flagger
player: Junior Caminero
regression_index: +35
direction: BUY
confidence: 0.78
source_urls:
  - https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/junior-caminero-...
  - https://www.fangraphs.com/players/junior-caminero/...
---
```

## Workflow

Copy this checklist and track progress:

```
Regression Flagger Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define the candidate list (who to check)
- [ ] Step 2: Web-search Savant for expected stats (xwOBA, xERA, xBA)
- [ ] Step 3: Web-search FanGraphs for surface stats (wOBA, ERA, BABIP, HR/FB)
- [ ] Step 4: Compute regression_index per player
- [ ] Step 5: Apply secondary flags (BABIP, HR/FB)
- [ ] Step 6: Emit signal file + user-facing translation
```

**Step 1: Define the candidate list**

Who are we checking? Three entry points:
- [ ] User's current roster (for SELL candidates — anyone overperforming)
- [ ] Free agents + waiver wire (for BUY candidates — anyone underperforming with elite underlying metrics)
- [ ] Specific player asked about (e.g., trade target)

**Step 2: Web-search Baseball Savant for expected stats**

See [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md#how-to-web-search-savant) for exact queries and URL patterns.

- [ ] Hitters: `xwOBA`, `xBA`, `xSLG`, Barrel %, Hard-Hit %
- [ ] Pitchers: `xERA`, Expected Batting Average against, Whiff %, Chase %
- [ ] Record each URL in `source_urls` for the signal file

**Step 3: Web-search FanGraphs for surface stats**

See [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md#how-to-web-search-fangraphs) for query patterns.

- [ ] Hitters: `wOBA`, `BABIP`, AVG, OBP, SLG
- [ ] Pitchers: `ERA`, `FIP`, `xFIP`, HR/FB %, LOB %
- [ ] Record each URL

**Step 4: Compute regression_index**

See [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md#formulas) for the formulas.

- [ ] Hitter: `regression_index = (xwOBA - wOBA) x 500`, clamped to ±100
- [ ] Pitcher: `regression_index = (FIP - ERA) x 50`, clamped to ±100
  - Note: for pitchers, a LARGER (more positive) FIP than ERA = pitcher has been lucky (negative signal for fantasy); a SMALLER FIP than ERA = pitcher has been unlucky (positive signal). See methodology for sign convention.
- [ ] Populate [resources/template.md](resources/template.md#flagged-players-table) with the result

**Step 5: Apply secondary flags**

- [ ] Hitter BABIP check: flag if > .370 (unsustainably lucky) or < .240 (unsustainably unlucky)
- [ ] Pitcher HR/FB check: flag if > 17% (unlucky, normalizes to ~12%) or < 8% (lucky)
- [ ] Note: secondary flags reinforce or contradict the primary `regression_index`. When they agree, confidence goes up; when they disagree, confidence drops and the player goes into a "watchlist" bucket instead of an actionable BUY/SELL.

**Step 6: Emit signal file + user-facing translation**

- [ ] Write `signals/YYYY-MM-DD-regression.md` with frontmatter per signal-framework.md
- [ ] Translate every stat to plain English for the user (per CLAUDE.md rule #5)
- [ ] End every recommendation with an action verb: `BUY` / `SELL` / `HOLD` / `ADD` / `DROP` (per CLAUDE.md rule #6)
- [ ] Validate against [resources/evaluators/rubric_mlb_regression_flagger.json](resources/evaluators/rubric_mlb_regression_flagger.json). Target average ≥ 3.5.

## Common Patterns

**Pattern 1: The Elite-Contact, Bad-Luck Hitter (classic BUY)**
- **Signals**: xwOBA - wOBA ≥ +.050, Barrel % ≥ 90th percentile, BABIP ≤ .260
- **Typical profile**: Young hitter with elite exit velocity whose line drives are finding gloves
- **Action**: Aggressive BUY. Offer a trade for them before the market catches on. Bid FAAB if they are on waivers.
- **Example**: Junior Caminero — xwOBA .380 vs wOBA .310, BABIP .255 → `+35`, BUY.

**Pattern 2: The Lucky Journeyman (classic SELL)**
- **Signals**: wOBA - xwOBA ≥ +.050, Barrel % below median, BABIP ≥ .360
- **Typical profile**: Career-average hitter riding a hot streak on soft contact
- **Action**: SELL high. Try to trade them for a BUY-LOW target of real talent.
- **Example** (hypothetical): Utility IF hitting .310 with a .360 BABIP and xwOBA .295 vs wOBA .340 → `-22`, SELL.

**Pattern 3: The Pitcher-Lucky Starter (SELL)**
- **Signals**: ERA much lower than FIP (e.g., 2.50 ERA, 4.20 FIP), HR/FB < 8%, strand rate (LOB%) > 80%
- **Typical profile**: Starter whose fly balls aren't leaving the park and whose inherited runners aren't scoring
- **Action**: SELL while his ERA still looks shiny.
- **Regression_index example**: `(FIP - ERA) x 50 = (4.20 - 2.50) x 50 = +85`. But for pitchers a large FIP-ERA gap means he has been LUCKY → flip sign → `-85`, SELL. See methodology for sign convention.

**Pattern 4: The Pitcher-Unlucky Starter (BUY)**
- **Signals**: ERA well above FIP (e.g., 5.10 ERA, 3.40 FIP), HR/FB > 17%, LOB% < 68%
- **Typical profile**: Good stuff, bad sequencing / BABIP luck
- **Action**: BUY before the ERA corrects.

**Pattern 5: Conflicting Signals (WATCHLIST, not actionable)**
- **Signals**: xwOBA-wOBA gap is large but Barrel % is below median, OR BABIP is extreme but contact quality confirms it
- **Action**: Do NOT auto-flag BUY/SELL. Emit `regression_index` with reduced confidence (< 0.5) and place on watchlist for another week.

## Guardrails

1. **Sample-size minimum**: Do not emit a `regression_index` for a hitter with fewer than 80 PAs or a pitcher with fewer than 30 IP. Statcast expected stats are noisy below that. If below threshold, emit `confidence: 0.3` and label `too-early`.

2. **Sign convention for pitchers**: `(FIP - ERA) x 50` gives a raw number. A POSITIVE raw number means ERA < FIP → the pitcher has been LUCKY → negate to produce a NEGATIVE `regression_index` (SELL signal). A NEGATIVE raw number means ERA > FIP → UNLUCKY → negate to POSITIVE (BUY). Always negate. See methodology for the worked example. Hitters use the raw sign directly.

3. **Clamp to ±100**: Extreme xwOBA gaps (>.200) are almost always small-sample artifacts. Clamp hard. Do not report `regression_index` of +140.

4. **Park and platoon adjustments**: xwOBA from Savant is park-neutral but does not adjust for platoon splits. For a LHH playing in a tough-for-lefties park (e.g., Oracle) with many LHP starts ahead, the regression may be slower than the index suggests. Note as a caveat; do not recompute.

5. **BABIP is secondary, not primary**: A high BABIP alone is not a SELL signal if underlying contact quality is elite. Hitters with extreme exit velocity (e.g., Judge, Ohtani) sustain BABIPs above .340 for full seasons. Always cross-check BABIP against Hard-Hit % before flagging.

6. **HR/FB normalization for pitchers**: League-average HR/FB is ~12%. Pitchers regress toward their career HR/FB, not league average. A flyball pitcher's "normal" HR/FB is 14%; a groundball pitcher's is 9%. Use career or 3-year average when available; fall back to 12% only if no history.

7. **Web-search every fact (per CLAUDE.md)**: Every number that enters the formula must come from a live web search with the URL recorded in `source_urls:`. Never fill in from memory or training data. If a search fails, degrade to `confidence: 0.3` and flag in the red-team pass.

8. **Translate for the beginner**: The user has zero baseball knowledge. Every user-facing sentence that uses "xwOBA", "FIP", "BABIP" must include an inline translation on first use. See CLAUDE.md rule #5 and the [Example](#example) above.

## Quick Reference

**Core formulas:**

```
HITTER:  regression_index = clamp((xwOBA - wOBA) x 500, -100, +100)
         positive = UNLUCKY (BUY); negative = LUCKY (SELL)

PITCHER: raw = (FIP - ERA) x 50
         regression_index = clamp(-raw, -100, +100)
         positive = UNLUCKY (BUY); negative = LUCKY (SELL)

SECONDARY (hitter):  BABIP > .370 → lucky flag; BABIP < .240 → unlucky flag
SECONDARY (pitcher): HR/FB < 8% → lucky flag; HR/FB > 17% → unlucky flag
```

**Action thresholds:**

| `regression_index` | Direction | Fantasy action |
|---|---|---|
| ≥ +30 | Very unlucky | Aggressive BUY / ADD / high FAAB bid |
| +15 to +29 | Mildly unlucky | BUY if available cheaply |
| -14 to +14 | Noise | HOLD / no action |
| -29 to -15 | Mildly lucky | SELL if offered market-rate |
| ≤ -30 | Very lucky | Aggressive SELL / DROP / decline offers |

**Data source map (per data-sources.md):**

| Stat | Primary source | URL pattern |
|---|---|---|
| xwOBA, xBA, xSLG, Barrel %, Hard-Hit % | Baseball Savant | https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/{slug}-{id} |
| wOBA, BABIP (hitter) | FanGraphs | https://www.fangraphs.com/players/{slug}/{id} |
| ERA, FIP, xFIP, HR/FB, LOB% | FanGraphs | same |
| xERA | Baseball Savant | same |

**Key resources:**

- **[resources/template.md](resources/template.md)**: Flagged-players table, per-player worksheet, signal file template
- **[resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md)**: Formulas with sign conventions, web-search query patterns, worked examples, BABIP & HR/FB normalization
- **[resources/evaluators/rubric_mlb_regression_flagger.json](resources/evaluators/rubric_mlb_regression_flagger.json)**: 8-criterion scoring rubric

**Inputs required:**

- Player name(s) or "scan roster" / "scan waivers"
- League context: weeks remaining, category needs (from `context/league-config.md` and `mlb-category-state-analyzer` signals)

**Outputs produced:**

- `regression_index` per player (-100 to +100)
- Direction tag: `BUY` / `SELL` / `HOLD` / `WATCHLIST`
- Secondary flag notes (BABIP, HR/FB)
- Signal file at `signals/YYYY-MM-DD-regression.md`
- User-facing summary with inline jargon translations and an action verb

More from lyndonkl/claude

SkillDescription
abstraction-concrete-examplesBuilds structured abstraction ladders that translate high-level principles into concrete, actionable examples across 3-5 levels. Bridges communication gaps, reveals hidden assumptions, and tests whether abstract ideas work in practice. Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps.
academic-letter-architectGuides the creation of evidence-based academic recommendation letters, reference letters, and award nominations that combine concrete examples, meaningful comparisons, and genuine enthusiasm. Use when writing recommendation letters for students, postdocs, or colleagues, or when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy and comparative statements.
adr-architectureDocuments significant architectural and technical decisions with full context, alternatives considered, trade-offs analyzed, and consequences understood. Creates a decision trail that helps teams understand why decisions were made. Use when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, establishing standards, migrating systems, or when user mentions ADR, architecture decision, technical decision record, or decision documentation.
adverse-selection-priorProduces a Bayesian prior probability that an offered transaction is +EV for the recipient, given that the counterparty chose to propose it. Applies Akerlof market-for-lemons logic -- if they offered it, they believe it is +EV for them, so the prior that it is +EV for us is materially below 50%. Reusable across trade evaluation, waiver drops (another team dropping a player is also adverse selection), job-offer analysis, M&A, and any "someone offered me this" situation. Use when you receive an unsolicited trade/offer/proposal, analyzing incoming trade prior, evaluating why a counterparty proposed a deal, or when user mentions adverse selection, market for lemons, why did they offer this, incoming trade prior, they proposed it, Bayesian adjustment on received offer.
alignment-values-north-starCreates actionable alignment frameworks that give teams a shared North Star (direction), values (guardrails), and decision tenets (behavioral standards). Enables autonomous decision-making while maintaining organizational coherence. Use when starting new teams, scaling organizations, defining culture, establishing product vision, resolving misalignment, creating strategic clarity, or when user mentions North Star, team values, mission, principles, guardrails, decision framework, or cultural alignment.
analogy-weight-checkFor every analogy in a substacker draft, verifies it carries mechanical weight — the analogy does real work explaining the mechanism, not merely decorates it. Cross-references analogy-catalog.md for novelty (is this analogy reused from a prior post?) and domain fit (biology > organizational > sports preferred; physics/military disfavored). Use whenever an analogy appears in the draft. Trigger keywords: analogy weight, decorative, mechanical weight, reused analogy, catalog check, metaphor check.
answer-uncomfortable-questionTakes one strategic question about substacker ("should we launch paid?", "is this section dead?", "are we writing for the wrong audience?") and produces the mandatory evidence + reasoning + downside triad plus a recommendation. Used 3 times per Growth Strategist review. Trigger keywords: uncomfortable question, strategic question, evidence reasoning downside, triad.
attribute-performanceFor each substacker post that materially over- or under-performs the rolling baseline (|z| ≥ 1.0), produces a plain-English attribution paragraph with calibrated confidence (high / medium / low / unexplained). Considers subject-line effect, topic zeitgeist, external share, day-of-week, length effect, and audience-notes signals. Labels unexplained outliers explicitly rather than fabricating a story. Use after compute-baseline when outlier posts exist. Trigger keywords: attribution, why did this post work, outlier explanation, performance analysis.
auction-first-price-shadingComputes the optimal shaded bid for a first-price sealed-bid auction given a true private value, an estimate of the number of competing bidders N, and a value-distribution assumption. Implements the `(N-1)/N` equilibrium shading rule for uniform private values, adjusts for log-normal or empirical value distributions, layers a risk-aversion adjustment, and caps output against the bidder's remaining budget. Domain-neutral auction theory reusable across fantasy sports (baseball FAAB, NBA/NHL waiver auctions), prediction-market limit sizing, sealed procurement bids, and any blind-bid context. Use when user mentions "first-price auction bid", "sealed bid shading", "(N-1)/N", "FAAB bid amount", "auction shading", "optimal bid first-price", "bid for sealed-bid", "blind bid sizing", or when downstream logic needs a principled shade factor rather than an ad-hoc heuristic.
auction-winners-curse-haircutApplies a Bayesian haircut to a bid valuation for common-value auctions where winning is itself evidence the bidder over-estimated. Takes a raw valuation, a value-type classification (common_value / private_value / mixed), the number of informed bidders N, and a signal-dispersion estimate, and returns an adjusted valuation. Domain-neutral and reusable across fantasy FAAB, prediction markets, M&A bids, ad-auction budgets, and any generic bidding context. Use when user mentions "winner's curse", "common value auction", "valuation haircut", "adverse valuation", "Bayesian bid adjustment", or "over-paying in auction".