hook-generator

$npx mdskill add lyndonkl/claude/hook-generator

Crafts platform-specific hooks from content spine

  • Creates multiple opening lines tailored to each social channel
  • Depends on platform rules and voice profile constraints
  • Scores candidates on attention, voice, and truth fidelity
  • Returns sorted list of high-fidelity hook options

SKILL.md

.github/skills/hook-generatorView on GitHub ↗
---
name: hook-generator
description: Generates 3-5 candidate first-line hooks for a specific platform (Substack Note, X, LinkedIn, cross-post) from a given spine. Uses platform-appropriate hook patterns (confession / claim / question / reframe) and voice-profile constraints. Runs before each platform rewrite so the rewrite skill picks the strongest hook rather than reusing the essay's opener verbatim on every platform. Trigger keywords: hook, opening line, platform hook, first tweet, LinkedIn hook, Substack Note hook.
---

# Hook Generator

## Workflow

```
Generate hooks for platform P from spine S:
- [ ] Step 1: Pull best_hook_candidates + thesis + opening claim from spine
- [ ] Step 2: Apply platform hook rules (see below)
- [ ] Step 3: Generate 3-5 candidates
- [ ] Step 4: Score each: attention (1-5), voice-fidelity (1-5), truth-fidelity (1-5)
- [ ] Step 5: Drop any hook scoring <4 on voice-fidelity
- [ ] Step 6: Return sorted list
```

## Platform hook rules

| Platform | Length cap | Pattern | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substack Note | 1–2 sentences | confession preferred | Can use em-dash reframe; closest to essay opener |
| X (hook tweet) | ≤240 chars | confession or bold claim | No question unless genuine; no "here's what I learned" |
| LinkedIn | ≤210 chars total (first 1–2 lines) | practitioner confession | "I spent four months…" > "I had a realization…" |
| Cross-post | N/A | third-person positioning | "In this piece, Kushal argues…" |

## Worked example

**Platform: X. Spine from *The Execution Gap*.**

**Candidates**:

1. **Confession (attention 5, voice 5, truth 5)**: "I have been meaning to open a Kalshi account for months. Not casually — the way you mean to clean the garage."
2. **Reframe (attention 4, voice 5, truth 5)**: "This isn't a story about prediction markets. It's a story about the distance between learning about something and actually doing it."
3. **Bold claim (attention 4, voice 4, truth 5)**: "Most 'learning' about a domain is substitution for doing the thing."
4. **Question (attention 3, voice 3, truth 5)** — DROPPED: "Why do so many of us substitute learning for doing?" — too generic for the writer's voice.

**Return 3 candidates** (dropped the one below voice-fidelity 4).

## Guardrails

1. Never generate a hook that promises something the essay doesn't deliver.
2. Never use "AI is transforming…" / "In today's fast-paced…" / "Let's explore…" in any hook.
3. Don't start with a stat unless the stat is in the essay.
4. Don't propose a hook whose voice-fidelity score is <4 — drop it, don't include.
5. Per platform, stay within the length cap — a 300-char X hook that would fit in two tweets is not a hook, it's a thread.
6. Cross-post hook uses third person; never "I" in that variant.

More from lyndonkl/claude

SkillDescription
abstraction-concrete-examplesBuilds structured abstraction ladders that translate high-level principles into concrete, actionable examples across 3-5 levels. Bridges communication gaps, reveals hidden assumptions, and tests whether abstract ideas work in practice. Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps.
academic-letter-architectGuides the creation of evidence-based academic recommendation letters, reference letters, and award nominations that combine concrete examples, meaningful comparisons, and genuine enthusiasm. Use when writing recommendation letters for students, postdocs, or colleagues, or when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy and comparative statements.
adr-architectureDocuments significant architectural and technical decisions with full context, alternatives considered, trade-offs analyzed, and consequences understood. Creates a decision trail that helps teams understand why decisions were made. Use when choosing between technology options, making infrastructure decisions, establishing standards, migrating systems, or when user mentions ADR, architecture decision, technical decision record, or decision documentation.
adverse-selection-priorProduces a Bayesian prior probability that an offered transaction is +EV for the recipient, given that the counterparty chose to propose it. Applies Akerlof market-for-lemons logic -- if they offered it, they believe it is +EV for them, so the prior that it is +EV for us is materially below 50%. Reusable across trade evaluation, waiver drops (another team dropping a player is also adverse selection), job-offer analysis, M&A, and any "someone offered me this" situation. Use when you receive an unsolicited trade/offer/proposal, analyzing incoming trade prior, evaluating why a counterparty proposed a deal, or when user mentions adverse selection, market for lemons, why did they offer this, incoming trade prior, they proposed it, Bayesian adjustment on received offer.
alignment-values-north-starCreates actionable alignment frameworks that give teams a shared North Star (direction), values (guardrails), and decision tenets (behavioral standards). Enables autonomous decision-making while maintaining organizational coherence. Use when starting new teams, scaling organizations, defining culture, establishing product vision, resolving misalignment, creating strategic clarity, or when user mentions North Star, team values, mission, principles, guardrails, decision framework, or cultural alignment.
analogy-weight-checkFor every analogy in a substacker draft, verifies it carries mechanical weight — the analogy does real work explaining the mechanism, not merely decorates it. Cross-references analogy-catalog.md for novelty (is this analogy reused from a prior post?) and domain fit (biology > organizational > sports preferred; physics/military disfavored). Use whenever an analogy appears in the draft. Trigger keywords: analogy weight, decorative, mechanical weight, reused analogy, catalog check, metaphor check.
answer-uncomfortable-questionTakes one strategic question about substacker ("should we launch paid?", "is this section dead?", "are we writing for the wrong audience?") and produces the mandatory evidence + reasoning + downside triad plus a recommendation. Used 3 times per Growth Strategist review. Trigger keywords: uncomfortable question, strategic question, evidence reasoning downside, triad.
attribute-performanceFor each substacker post that materially over- or under-performs the rolling baseline (|z| ≥ 1.0), produces a plain-English attribution paragraph with calibrated confidence (high / medium / low / unexplained). Considers subject-line effect, topic zeitgeist, external share, day-of-week, length effect, and audience-notes signals. Labels unexplained outliers explicitly rather than fabricating a story. Use after compute-baseline when outlier posts exist. Trigger keywords: attribution, why did this post work, outlier explanation, performance analysis.
auction-first-price-shadingComputes the optimal shaded bid for a first-price sealed-bid auction given a true private value, an estimate of the number of competing bidders N, and a value-distribution assumption. Implements the `(N-1)/N` equilibrium shading rule for uniform private values, adjusts for log-normal or empirical value distributions, layers a risk-aversion adjustment, and caps output against the bidder's remaining budget. Domain-neutral auction theory reusable across fantasy sports (baseball FAAB, NBA/NHL waiver auctions), prediction-market limit sizing, sealed procurement bids, and any blind-bid context. Use when user mentions "first-price auction bid", "sealed bid shading", "(N-1)/N", "FAAB bid amount", "auction shading", "optimal bid first-price", "bid for sealed-bid", "blind bid sizing", or when downstream logic needs a principled shade factor rather than an ad-hoc heuristic.
auction-winners-curse-haircutApplies a Bayesian haircut to a bid valuation for common-value auctions where winning is itself evidence the bidder over-estimated. Takes a raw valuation, a value-type classification (common_value / private_value / mixed), the number of informed bidders N, and a signal-dispersion estimate, and returns an adjusted valuation. Domain-neutral and reusable across fantasy FAAB, prediction markets, M&A bids, ad-auction budgets, and any generic bidding context. Use when user mentions "winner's curse", "common value auction", "valuation haircut", "adverse valuation", "Bayesian bid adjustment", or "over-paying in auction".