ruff-recursive-fix
$
npx mdskill add github/awesome-copilot/ruff-recursive-fixEnforce strict code quality by iteratively applying and reviewing Ruff autofixes across specified codebases.
- Resolves complex linting issues by repeatedly applying automated code corrections.
- Integrates with the Ruff linter, accepting custom execution prefixes and rule sets.
- Determines necessary edits by running checks, reviewing diffs, and repeating passes.
- Delivers actionable code changes and requires explicit user confirmation for final resolution.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/ruff-recursive-fixView on GitHub ↗
--- name: ruff-recursive-fix description: Run Ruff checks with optional scope and rule overrides, apply safe and unsafe autofixes iteratively, review each change, and resolve remaining findings with targeted edits or user decisions. --- # Ruff Recursive Fix ## Overview Use this skill to enforce code quality with Ruff in a controlled, iterative workflow. It supports: - Optional scope limitation to a specific folder. - Default project settings from `pyproject.toml`. - Flexible Ruff invocation (`uv`, direct `ruff`, `python -m ruff`, or equivalent). - Optional per-run rule overrides (`--select`, `--ignore`, `--extend-select`, `--extend-ignore`). - Automatic safe then unsafe autofixes. - Diff review after each fix pass. - Recursive repetition until findings are resolved or require a decision. - Judicious use of inline `# noqa` only when suppression is justified. ## Inputs Collect these inputs before running: - `target_path` (optional): folder or file to check. Empty means whole repository. - `ruff_runner` (optional): explicit Ruff command prefix (for example `uv run`, `ruff`, `python -m ruff`, `pipx run ruff`). - `rules_select` (optional): comma-separated rule codes to enforce. - `rules_ignore` (optional): comma-separated rule codes to ignore. - `extend_select` (optional): extra rules to add without replacing configured defaults. - `extend_ignore` (optional): extra ignored rules without replacing configured defaults. - `allow_unsafe_fixes` (default: true): whether to run Ruff unsafe fixes. - `ask_on_ambiguity` (default: true): always ask the user when multiple valid choices exist. ## Command Construction Build Ruff commands from inputs. ### 0. Resolve Ruff Runner Determine a reusable `ruff_cmd` prefix before building commands. Resolution order: 1. If `ruff_runner` is provided, use it as-is. 2. Else if `uv` is available and Ruff is managed through `uv`, use `uv run ruff`. 3. Else if `ruff` is available on `PATH`, use `ruff`. 4. Else if Python is available and Ruff is installed in that environment, use `python -m ruff`. 5. Else use any project-specific equivalent that invokes installed Ruff (for example `pipx run ruff`), or stop and ask the user. Use the same resolved `ruff_cmd` for all `check` and `format` commands in the workflow. Base command: ```bash <ruff_cmd> check ``` Formatter command: ```bash <ruff_cmd> format ``` With optional target: ```bash <ruff_cmd> format <target_path> ``` Add optional target: ```bash <ruff_cmd> check <target_path> ``` Add optional overrides as needed: ```bash --select <codes> --ignore <codes> --extend-select <codes> --extend-ignore <codes> ``` Examples: ```bash # Full project with defaults from pyproject.toml ruff check # One folder with defaults python -m ruff check src/models # Override to skip docs and TODO-like rules for this run uv run ruff check src --extend-ignore D,TD # Check only selected rules in a folder ruff check src/data --select F,E9,I ``` ## Workflow ### 1. Baseline Analysis 1. Run `<ruff_cmd> check` with the selected scope and options. 2. Classify findings by type: - Autofixable safe. - Autofixable unsafe. - Not autofixable. 3. If no findings remain, stop. ### 2. Safe Autofix Pass 1. Run Ruff with `--fix` using the same scope/options. 2. Review resulting diff carefully for semantic correctness and style consistency. 3. Run `<ruff_cmd> format` on the same scope. 4. Re-run `<ruff_cmd> check` to refresh remaining findings. ### 3. Unsafe Autofix Pass Run only if findings remain and `allow_unsafe_fixes=true`. 1. Run Ruff with `--fix --unsafe-fixes` using the same scope/options. 2. Review resulting diff carefully, prioritizing behavior-sensitive edits. 3. Run `<ruff_cmd> format` on the same scope. 4. Re-run `<ruff_cmd> check`. ### 4. Manual Remediation Pass For remaining findings: 1. Fix directly in code when there is a clear, safe correction. 2. Keep edits minimal and local. 3. Run `<ruff_cmd> format` on the same scope. 4. Re-run `<ruff_cmd> check`. ### 5. Ambiguity Policy If there are multiple valid solutions at any step, always ask the user before proceeding. Do not choose silently between equivalent options. ### 6. Suppression Decision (`# noqa`) Use suppression only when all conditions are true: - The rule conflicts with required behavior, public API, framework conventions, or readability goals. - Refactoring would be disproportionate to the value of the rule. - The suppression is narrow and specific (single line, explicit code when possible). Guidelines: - Prefer `# noqa: <RULE>` over broad `# noqa`. - Add a brief reason comment for non-obvious suppressions. - If two or more valid outcomes exist, always ask the user which option to prefer. ### 7. Recursive Loop and Stop Criteria Repeat steps 2 to 6 until one of these outcomes: - `<ruff_cmd> check` returns clean. - Remaining findings require architectural/product decisions. - Remaining findings are intentionally suppressed with documented rationale. - Repeated loop makes no progress. Each loop iteration must include `<ruff_cmd> format` before the next `<ruff_cmd> check`. When no progress is detected: 1. Summarize blocked rules and affected files. 2. Present valid options and trade-offs. 3. Ask the user to choose. ## Quality Gates Before declaring completion: - Ruff returns no unexpected findings for the chosen scope/options. - All autofix diffs are reviewed for correctness. - No suppression is added without explicit justification. - Any unsafe fix with possible behavioral impact is highlighted to the user. - Ruff formatting is executed in every iteration. ## Output Contract At the end of execution, report: - Scope and Ruff options used. - Number of iterations performed. - Summary of fixed findings. - List of manual fixes. - List of suppressions with rationale. - Remaining findings, if any, and required user decisions. ## Suggested Prompt Starters - "Run ruff-recursive-fix on the whole repo with default config." - "Run ruff-recursive-fix only on src/models, ignore DOC rules." - "Run ruff-recursive-fix on tests with select F,E9,I and no unsafe fixes." - "Run ruff-recursive-fix on src/data and ask me before adding any noqa."
More from github/awesome-copilot
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
- acreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
- acreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
- acreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
- add-educational-comments'Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.'
- adobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
- agent-governance|
- agent-owasp-compliance|
- agent-supply-chain|
- agentic-eval|