acreadiness-policy
$
npx mdskill add github/awesome-copilot/acreadiness-policyConfigure readiness scoring with custom AgentRC policies.
- Tailor scoring thresholds and disable irrelevant checks.
- Integrates with AgentRC for readiness evaluation.
- Uses JSON schema to define criteria and overrides.
- Delivers actionable policy configurations via JSON files.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/acreadiness-policyView on GitHub ↗
---
name: acreadiness-policy
description: 'Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.'
argument-hint: "[show | new <name> | apply <path-or-pkg>] — e.g. /acreadiness-policy show, /acreadiness-policy new strict-frontend"
---
# /acreadiness-policy — AgentRC policies
Use this skill when the user asks about **policies**, **strict mode**, **custom scoring**, **disabling checks**, **org standards**, or **CI gating** of readiness.
A policy is a small JSON file with three optional sections — `criteria`, `extras`, `thresholds` — that customise how AgentRC scores readiness.
## Built-in examples
AgentRC ships with three example policies in `examples/policies/`:
| Policy | What it does |
|---|---|
| `strict.json` | 100% pass rate, raises impact on key criteria |
| `ai-only.json` | Disables all repo-health checks, focuses on AI tooling |
| `repo-health-only.json` | Disables AI checks, focuses on traditional quality |
Recommend these as starting points before writing a custom policy.
## Policy schema
```jsonc
{
"name": "my-policy",
"criteria": {
"disable": ["env-example", "observability", "dependabot"],
"override": {
"readme": { "impact": "high", "level": 2 },
"lint-config": { "title": "Linter required" }
}
},
"extras": {
"disable": ["pre-commit"]
},
"thresholds": {
"passRate": 0.9
}
}
```
### Impact weights
| Impact | Weight |
|---|---|
| critical | 5 |
| high | 4 |
| medium | 3 |
| low | 2 |
| info | 0 |
`Score = 1 − (deductions / max possible weight)`. Grades: **A** ≥ 0.9, **B** ≥ 0.8, **C** ≥ 0.7, **D** ≥ 0.6, **F** < 0.6.
## Sub-commands
### `show`
List policies currently in effect (from `agentrc.config.json` `policies` array, or none).
### `new <name>`
Scaffold `policies/<name>.json` with sensible defaults. Walk the user through:
1. **What to disable** — irrelevant pillars or extras for their stack (e.g. disable `observability` for a static site).
2. **What to raise** — override `impact` to `high` or `critical` for must-haves (e.g. `readme`, `codeowners`).
3. **Pass-rate threshold** — typical org baselines: `0.7` (lenient), `0.85` (standard), `1.0` (strict).
4. Reference the policy from `agentrc.config.json`:
```json
{ "policies": ["./policies/<name>.json"] }
```
### `apply <path-or-pkg>`
Run `agentrc readiness --json --policy <source>` and re-render the report by handing off to the `assess` skill / `ai-readiness-reporter` agent. Supports chaining:
```bash
npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json --policy ./org-baseline.json,./team-frontend.json
```
## CI gating
Combine policies with `--fail-level` to enforce a minimum maturity level in CI:
```yaml
- run: npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --policy ./policies/strict.json --fail-level 3
```
## Advanced
JSON policies can disable, override, and set thresholds — but **cannot add new criteria**. For new detection logic, point users at AgentRC's TypeScript plugin system (`docs/dev/plugins.md`).
## Operating rules
- **Never silently disable a pillar.** If the user wants to disable `observability`, confirm and explain the trade-off.
- **Prefer overriding `impact` over disabling.** Disabling hides the gap entirely; overriding lets it still appear in the report.
- **Recommend extras stay enabled.** They cost nothing — they don't affect the score.
- **Suggest layering** — most orgs want a baseline policy + per-team overrides chained with `--policy a.json,b.json`.
More from github/awesome-copilot
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
- acreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
- acreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
- add-educational-comments'Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.'
- adobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
- agent-governance|
- agent-owasp-compliance|
- agent-supply-chain|
- agentic-eval|
- ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review'Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.'