refactor-method-complexity-reduce
$
npx mdskill add github/awesome-copilot/refactor-method-complexity-reduceReduce a function's cognitive complexity by extracting logic into focused, reusable helper methods.
- Addresses overly complex functions with deep nesting or numerous conditional branches.
- Requires access to the source code context of the target method.
- Analyzes structure to pinpoint areas suitable for modularization and simplification.
- Outputs the refactored code block containing the main method and new helpers.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/refactor-method-complexity-reduceView on GitHub ↗
---
name: refactor-method-complexity-reduce
description: 'Refactor given method `${input:methodName}` to reduce its cognitive complexity to `${input:complexityThreshold}` or below, by extracting helper methods.'
---
# Refactor Method to Reduce Cognitive Complexity
## Objective
Refactor the method `${input:methodName}`, to reduce its cognitive complexity to `${input:complexityThreshold}` or below, by extracting logic into focused helper methods.
## Instructions
1. **Analyze the current method** to identify sources of cognitive complexity:
- Nested conditional statements
- Multiple if-else or switch chains
- Repeated code blocks
- Multiple loops with conditions
- Complex boolean expressions
2. **Identify extraction opportunities**:
- Validation logic that can be extracted into a separate method
- Type-specific or case-specific processing that repeats
- Complex transformations or calculations
- Common patterns that appear multiple times
3. **Extract focused helper methods**:
- Each helper should have a single, clear responsibility
- Extract validation into separate `Validate*` methods
- Extract type-specific logic into handler methods
- Create utility methods for common operations
- Use appropriate access levels (static, private, async)
4. **Simplify the main method**:
- Reduce nesting depth
- Replace massive if-else chains with smaller orchestrated calls
- Use switch statements where appropriate for cleaner dispatch
- Ensure the main method reads as a high-level flow
5. **Preserve functionality**:
- Maintain the same input/output behavior
- Keep all validation and error handling
- Preserve exception types and error messages
- Ensure all parameters are properly passed to helpers
6. **Best practices**:
- Make helper methods static when they don't need instance state
- Use null checks and guard clauses early
- Avoid creating unnecessary local variables
- Consider using tuples for multiple return values
- Group related helper methods together
## Implementation Approach
- Extract helper methods before refactoring the main flow
- Test incrementally to ensure no regressions
- Use meaningful names that describe the extracted responsibility
- Keep extracted methods close to where they're used
- Consider making repeated code patterns into generic methods
## Result
The refactored method should:
- Have cognitive complexity reduced to the target threshold of `${input:complexityThreshold}` or below
- Be more readable and maintainable
- Have clear separation of concerns
- Be easier to test and debug
- Retain all original functionality
## Testing and Validation
**CRITICAL: After completing the refactoring, you MUST:**
1. **Run all existing tests** related to the refactored method and its surrounding functionality
2. **MANDATORY: Explicitly verify test results show "failed=0"**
- **NEVER assume tests passed** - always examine the actual test output
- Search for the summary line containing pass/fail counts (e.g., "passed=X failed=Y")
- **If the summary shows any number other than "failed=0", tests have FAILED**
- If test output is in a file, read the entire file to locate and verify the failure count
- Running tests is NOT the same as verifying tests passed
- **Do not proceed** until you have explicitly confirmed zero failures
3. **If any tests fail (failed > 0):**
- State clearly how many tests failed
- Analyze each failure to understand what functionality was broken
- Common causes: null handling, empty collection checks, condition logic errors
- Identify the root cause in the refactored code
- Correct the refactored code to restore the original behavior
- Re-run tests and verify "failed=0" in the output
- Repeat until all tests pass (failed=0)
4. **Verify compilation** - Ensure there are no compilation errors
5. **Check cognitive complexity** - Confirm the metric is at or below the target threshold of `${input:complexityThreshold}`
## Confirmation Checklist
- [ ] Code compiles without errors
- [ ] **Test results explicitly state "failed=0"** (verified by reading the output)
- [ ] All test failures analyzed and corrected (if any occurred)
- [ ] Cognitive complexity is at or below the target threshold of `${input:complexityThreshold}`
- [ ] All original functionality is preserved
- [ ] Code follows project conventions and standards
More from github/awesome-copilot
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
- acreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
- acreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
- acreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
- add-educational-comments'Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.'
- adobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
- agent-governance|
- agent-owasp-compliance|
- agent-supply-chain|
- agentic-eval|