eyeball

$npx mdskill add github/awesome-copilot/eyeball

Verify document claims with inline source screenshots.

  • Generates Word docs highlighting factual claims against source material.
  • Processes local files and public web URLs for analysis.
  • Uses Python utilities to extract and map text to visual evidence.
  • Delivers results as desktop Word documents with yellow highlights.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/eyeballView on GitHub ↗
---
name: eyeball
description: 'Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.'
---

# Eyeball

Analyze documents with visual proof. When activated, Eyeball produces a Word document on the user's Desktop where every factual assertion includes an inline screenshot from the source material with the cited text highlighted in yellow.

## Activation

When the user invokes this skill (e.g., "use eyeball", "run eyeball on this", "eyeball this document"), respond with:

> **Eyeball is active.** I'll analyze the document and produce a Word doc with inline source screenshots so you can verify every claim with your own eyes.

Then follow the workflow below.

## Supported Sources

- **Local files:** Word documents (.docx, .doc), PDFs (.pdf), RTF files
- **Web URLs:** Any publicly accessible web page

## Tool Location

The Eyeball Python utility is located at:
```
<plugin_dir>/skills/eyeball/tools/eyeball.py
```

To find the actual path, run:
```bash
find ~/.copilot/installed-plugins -name "eyeball.py" -path "*/eyeball/*" 2>/dev/null
```

If not found there, check the project directory or the user's home directory for the eyeball repo.

## First-Run Setup

Before first use, check that dependencies are installed:

```bash
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py setup-check
```

If anything is missing, install the required dependencies:
```bash
pip3 install pymupdf pillow python-docx playwright
python3 -m playwright install chromium
```

On Windows, also install pywin32 for Word automation:
```bash
pip install pywin32
```

## Workflow

Follow these steps exactly. The order matters.

### Step 1: Read the source text

Before writing any analysis, extract and read the full text of the source document:

```bash
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py extract-text --source "<path-or-url>"
```

Read the output carefully. Identify actual section numbers, headings, page numbers, and key language.

**CRITICAL:** Do not skip this step. Do not write analysis based on assumptions about how the document is structured. Read the actual text.

### Step 2: Write analysis with exact citations

For each point in your analysis, you must:

1. **Reference the correct section number as it appears in the document** (e.g., "Section 9" not "Section 8" because you assumed the numbering).
2. **Reference the correct page number** where the section appears in the extracted text.
3. **Select anchors that are verbatim phrases from the source** that directly support your claim.

### Step 3: Select anchors correctly

This is the most important step. Anchors determine what gets highlighted in the screenshots.

**DO:**
- Use verbatim phrases from the source text that directly support your assertion
- Use multiple anchors to span the full range of text the reader should see
- Use specific, uncommon phrases that appear only where you intend

**DO NOT:**
- Use generic topic labels (e.g., "Confidentiality") that appear throughout the document
- Use section titles alone when they appear as cross-references elsewhere
- Use single common words that match in many places

**Examples:**

WRONG -- uses a generic topic label that matches everywhere:
```json
{"anchors": ["User-Generated Content"], "target_page": 8}
```

RIGHT -- uses the specific language that supports the claim:
```json
{"anchors": ["retain ownership", "Ownership of Content, Right to Post"], "target_page": 8}
```

WRONG -- section title appears as a cross-reference on earlier pages:
```json
{"anchors": ["LIMITATION OF LIABILITY"]}
```

RIGHT -- includes the section number for precision, targets the correct page:
```json
{"anchors": ["12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY", "INDIRECT", "CONSEQUENTIAL"], "target_page": 13}
```

### Step 4: Build the analysis document

Construct a JSON array of sections and call the build command:

```bash
python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py build \
  --source "<path-or-url>" \
  --output ~/Desktop/<title>.docx \
  --title "Analysis Title" \
  --subtitle "Source description" \
  --sections '[
    {
      "heading": "1. Section Title",
      "analysis": "Your analysis text here. Reference Section X on page Y...",
      "anchors": ["verbatim phrase 1", "verbatim phrase 2"],
      "target_page": 5,
      "context_padding": 40
    },
    {
      "heading": "2. Another Section",
      "analysis": "More analysis...",
      "anchors": ["exact quote from source"],
      "target_pages": [10, 11],
      "context_padding": 50
    }
  ]'
```

Section object fields:
- `heading` (required): Section heading in the output document
- `analysis` (required): Your analysis text
- `anchors` (required): List of verbatim phrases from the source to search for and highlight
- `target_page` (optional): Single page number (1-indexed) to search on
- `target_pages` (optional): List of page numbers to search across (screenshots stitched vertically)
- `context_padding` (optional): Padding in PDF points above/below the anchor region (default: 40). Increase for more context.

### Step 5: Deliver the output

Save the output to the user's Desktop. Tell the user the filename and that they can open it to verify each claim against the highlighted source screenshots.

## Self-Check Before Delivery

Before saving the final document, mentally verify:

1. Does each section's analysis text reference the correct section number from the source?
2. Are the anchors verbatim phrases that appear on the target page?
3. Does each anchor directly support the claim in the analysis, not just relate to the same topic?
4. If the screenshot doesn't match the analysis, is the analysis wrong or is the anchor wrong? Fix whichever is incorrect.

## Notes

- The output document includes highlighted screenshots that are dynamically sized. If you provide multiple anchors, the screenshot expands to cover all of them.
- When a search term is not found, the output document will note this. If this happens, the anchor was likely not verbatim enough. Adjust and rebuild.
- For web pages, Playwright renders the page to PDF first. The resulting page numbers may differ from what you see in a browser. Use the extracted text output (step 1) to determine correct page numbers.
- If the user has already provided the source text or you have already read it in the current conversation, you can skip step 1. But always verify section numbers and page references against the actual text before writing analysis.

More from github/awesome-copilot

SkillDescription
acquire-codebase-knowledgeUse this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
acreadiness-assessRun the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
acreadiness-generate-instructionsGenerate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.
acreadiness-policyHelp the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
add-educational-comments'Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.'
adobe-illustrator-scriptingWrite, debug, and optimize Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Use when creating or modifying scripts that manipulate documents, layers, paths, text frames, colors, symbols, artboards, or any Illustrator DOM objects. Covers the complete JavaScript object model, coordinate system, measurement units, export workflows, and scripting best practices.
agent-governance|
agent-owasp-compliance|
agent-supply-chain|
agentic-eval|