fastapi-code-review

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/fastapi-code-review

Reviews FastAPI code for routing, dependencies, validation, and async patterns.

  • Identifies issues in APIRouter setup, response models, and status codes.
  • Depends on Pydantic models and FastAPI's dependency injection system.
  • Checks for proper async handlers, blocking I/O, and background tasks.
  • Provides a checklist and references to guide code improvements.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/fastapi-code-reviewView on GitHub ↗
---
name: fastapi-code-review
description: Reviews FastAPI code for routing patterns, dependency injection, validation, and async handlers. Use when reviewing FastAPI apps, checking APIRouter setup, Depends() usage, or response models.
---

# FastAPI Code Review

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| APIRouter setup, response_model, status codes | [references/routes.md](references/routes.md) |
| Depends(), yield deps, cleanup, shared deps | [references/dependencies.md](references/dependencies.md) |
| Pydantic models, HTTPException, 422 handling | [references/validation.md](references/validation.md) |
| Async handlers, blocking I/O, background tasks | [references/async.md](references/async.md) |

## Review Checklist

- [ ] APIRouter with proper prefix and tags
- [ ] All routes specify `response_model` for type safety
- [ ] Correct HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)
- [ ] Proper status codes (200, 201, 204, 404, etc.)
- [ ] Dependencies use `Depends()` not manual calls
- [ ] Yield dependencies have proper cleanup
- [ ] Request/Response models use Pydantic
- [ ] HTTPException with status code and detail
- [ ] All route handlers are `async def`
- [ ] No blocking I/O (`requests`, `time.sleep`, `open()`)
- [ ] Background tasks for non-blocking operations
- [ ] No bare `except` in route handlers

## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are idiomatic FastAPI patterns that may appear problematic but are correct:

- **Pydantic validates request body automatically** - No manual validation needed when using typed Pydantic models as parameters
- **Dependency injection for database sessions** - Sessions come from `Depends()`, not passed as function arguments
- **HTTPException for all HTTP errors** - FastAPI handles conversion to proper HTTP responses
- **Async def endpoint without await** - May be using sync dependencies or simple operations; FastAPI handles this
- **Type annotation on Depends()** - This is documentation/IDE support, not a type assertion
- **Query/Path/Body defaults** - FastAPI processes these at runtime, not traditional Python defaults
- **Returning dict from endpoint** - Pydantic converts automatically if `response_model` is set

## Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag issues when the context warrants it:

- **Flag missing validation** ONLY IF the field isn't already in a Pydantic model with validators
- **Flag missing auth** ONLY IF the endpoint isn't using `Depends()` with an auth dependency
- **Flag missing error handling** ONLY IF HTTPException isn't raised appropriately for error cases
- **Flag sync in async** ONLY IF the operation is actually blocking (file I/O, network calls, CPU-bound), not just non-async

## Gates (FastAPI-specific)

Run **once per FastAPI-related finding**, after you can anchor **`file:line`** for the handler (see [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md)) and **before** the finding text ships. If a step’s pass condition is not met, **do not** assert the finding as written—gather evidence, withdraw, downgrade severity, or rephrase as a question.

### Gate 1 — Route decorator and response surface

| Step | Action | **Pass condition** |
|------|--------|---------------------|
| 1a | Open the handler’s route decorator in the repo (not from memory). | **`file:line`** for `@router.*` / `@app.*` (or the site that registers this handler). |
| 1b | Record HTTP method, `response_model=`, and `status_code=` on that decorator (or note they are absent). | **Snippet from that line** or **explicit absent** with the same **`file:line`**. |

### Gate 2 — Blocking or “should be async”

| Step | Action | **Pass condition** |
|------|--------|---------------------|
| 2a | Read the full handler body. | **`file:line` range** covering the body. |
| 2b | If claiming blocking I/O: name each blocking call (e.g. `requests.`, `open(`, `time.sleep`, sync DB/ORM). | **Each** call has **`file:line`**, or withdraw the finding if **none** after the read. |

### Gate 3 — Depends, validation, auth

| Step | Action | **Pass condition** |
|------|--------|---------------------|
| 3a | List parameters: `Depends` / `Annotated[..., Depends]`, Pydantic models, `Body`/`Query`/`Path`, `Request`/`Response`. | **Names + mechanism** tied to **`file:line`** on the signature. |
| 3b | If claiming missing auth: search the handler file (and its `APIRouter` module if separate) for `Depends`, `Security`, `HTTPBearer`, or project auth dependencies. | **Citation** to an existing hook, or **search result**: paths searched + **N matches** (zero is allowed). |
| 3c | If claiming missing validation: confirm the argument is not already a Pydantic model or constrained `Query`/`Path`/`Body`. | **Type/source** with **`file:line`**, or withdraw if validation already applies. |

## FastAPI Framework Behaviors

FastAPI + Pydantic handle many concerns automatically:
- Request validation via Pydantic models
- Response serialization via response_model
- Dependency injection for cross-cutting concerns
- Exception handling via exception handlers

Before flagging "missing" functionality, verify FastAPI isn't handling it.

## When to Load References

- Reviewing route definitions → routes.md
- Reviewing dependency injection → dependencies.md
- Reviewing Pydantic models/validation → validation.md
- Reviewing async route handlers → async.md

## Review Questions

1. Do all routes have explicit response models and status codes?
2. Are dependencies injected via Depends() with proper cleanup?
3. Do all Pydantic models validate inputs correctly?
4. Are all route handlers async and non-blocking?

## Before Submitting Findings

1. For each FastAPI-related finding, complete **Gates (FastAPI-specific)** above.
2. Load and follow [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) (Pre-Report checklist and **Verification by Issue Type**) before reporting any issue.

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
cloudkit-code-reviewReviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.