cloudkit-code-review

$npx mdskill add existential-birds/beagle/cloudkit-code-review

Reviews CloudKit code for container, records, subscriptions, and sharing patterns.

  • Ensures CloudKit code follows best practices for container setup and error handling.
  • Depends on CloudKit APIs like CKContainer, CKRecord, CKSubscription, and CKShare.
  • Analyzes code for common issues like missing account checks, custom zones, and conflict handling.
  • Outputs a checklist of review items and references to detailed guidelines.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/cloudkit-code-reviewView on GitHub ↗
---
name: cloudkit-code-review
description: Reviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
---

# CloudKit Code Review

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| CKContainer, databases, zones, entitlements | [references/container-setup.md](references/container-setup.md) |
| CKRecord, references, assets, batch operations | [references/records.md](references/records.md) |
| CKSubscription, push notifications, silent sync | [references/subscriptions.md](references/subscriptions.md) |
| CKShare, participants, permissions, acceptance | [references/sharing.md](references/sharing.md) |

## Review Checklist

- [ ] Account status checked before private/shared database operations
- [ ] Custom zones used (not default zone) for production data
- [ ] All CloudKit errors handled with `retryAfterSeconds` respected
- [ ] `serverRecordChanged` conflicts handled with proper merge logic
- [ ] `CKErrorPartialFailure` parsed for individual record errors
- [ ] Batch operations used (`CKModifyRecordsOperation`) not individual saves
- [ ] Large binary data stored as `CKAsset` (records have 1MB limit)
- [ ] Record keys type-safe (enums) not string literals
- [ ] UI updates dispatched to main thread from callbacks
- [ ] `CKAccountChangedNotification` observed for account switches
- [ ] Subscriptions have unique IDs to prevent duplicates
- [ ] CKShare uses custom zone (sharing requires custom zones)

## When to Load References

- Reviewing container/database setup or zones -> container-setup.md
- Reviewing record CRUD or relationships -> records.md
- Reviewing push notifications or sync triggers -> subscriptions.md
- Reviewing sharing or collaboration features -> sharing.md

## Output Format

Report issues using: `[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE`

Examples:
- `[AppDelegate.swift:24] CKContainer not in custom zone`
- `[SyncManager.swift:156] Unhandled CKErrorPartialFailure`
- `[DataStore.swift:89] Missing retryAfterSeconds backoff`

## Review Questions

1. What happens when the user is signed out of iCloud?
2. Does error handling respect rate limiting (`retryAfterSeconds`)?
3. Are conflicts resolved or does data get overwritten silently?
4. Is the schema deployed to production before App Store release?
5. Are shared records in custom zones (required for CKShare)?

## Hard gates (before reporting)

Complete **in order** for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.

1. **Location artifact** — The finding includes `[FILE:LINE]` (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo.
2. **Scope read** — You read the full surrounding unit: the type or function that owns the CloudKit work (for example the `CKOperation` subclass usage, completion handler chain, or `CKRecord` lifecycle), not only a diff hunk or isolated snippet.
3. **CloudKit or deployment claim** (only if the finding depends on container identifiers, public vs private database choice, custom zone requirement, iCloud account state, entitlements, or production schema) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example `com.apple.developer.icloud-container-environment` or container ID in the entitlements file, `CKContainer.default()` vs custom identifier in source, `Info.plist` / target capability, or evidence that schema is deployed) **or** you downgrade the item to an open question in [Review Questions](#review-questions).
4. **Protocol** — Pre-report steps in [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).

Use the issue format `[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE` for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.

More from existential-birds/beagle

SkillDescription
adr-decision-extractionUse when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit \"[ADR]\" tags. Triggers on \"what decisions did we make\", \"extract decisions from this chat\", \"find the choices in our discussion\", or \"summarize architectural decisions\". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents \u2014 use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
adr-writingUse when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on \"write the ADR\", \"format as MADR\", \"check ADR quality\", \"mark gaps in ADR\". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).
agent-architecture-analysisUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on \"analyze agent architecture\", \"12-factor audit\", \"how compliant is this agent\", or \"evaluate this LLM app\". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists \u2014 this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
app-intents-code-reviewReviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.
artifact-analysisUse when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: \"analyze these docs\", \"scan my project for context\", \"read the docs folder\", \"summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/\", \"extract context from docs/\", \"what's in this folder\", \"go read everything in X and tell me what's there\". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups (\"find this function\", \"search the repo\"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
axum-code-reviewReviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
brainstorm-beagleUse when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: \"brainstorm this\", \"I have an idea for...\", \"help me think through this project\", \"what should I build\", \"spec this out\". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews \u2014 produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
bubbletea-code-reviewReviews BubbleTea TUI code for proper Elm architecture, model/update/view patterns, and Lipgloss styling. Use when reviewing terminal UI code using charmbracelet/bubbletea.
combine-code-reviewReviews Combine framework code for memory leaks, operator misuse, and error handling. Use when reviewing code with import Combine, AnyPublisher, @Published, PassthroughSubject, or CurrentValueSubject.
commit-pushcommit and push all local changes to remote repo