---
name: elixir-performance-review
description: Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.
---
# Elixir Performance Review
## Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| Mailbox overflow, blocking calls | [references/genserver-bottlenecks.md](references/genserver-bottlenecks.md) |
| When to use ETS, read/write concurrency | [references/ets-patterns.md](references/ets-patterns.md) |
| Binary handling, large messages | [references/memory.md](references/memory.md) |
| Task patterns, flow control | [references/concurrency.md](references/concurrency.md) |
## Review Checklist
### GenServer
- [ ] Not a single-process bottleneck for all requests
- [ ] No blocking operations in handle_call/cast
- [ ] Proper timeout configuration
- [ ] Consider ETS for read-heavy state
### Memory
- [ ] Large binaries not copied between processes
- [ ] Streams used for large data transformations
- [ ] No unbounded data accumulation
### Concurrency
- [ ] Task.Supervisor for dynamic tasks (not raw Task.async)
- [ ] No unbounded process spawning
- [ ] Proper backpressure for message producers
### Database
- [ ] Preloading to avoid N+1 queries
- [ ] Pagination for large result sets
- [ ] Indexes for frequent queries
## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)
- **Single GenServer for low-throughput** - Not all state needs horizontal scaling
- **Synchronous calls for critical paths** - Consistency may require it
- **In-memory state without ETS** - ETS has overhead for small state
- **Enum over Stream for small collections** - Stream overhead not worth it
## Context-Sensitive Rules
| Issue | Flag ONLY IF |
|-------|--------------|
| GenServer bottleneck | Handles > 1000 req/sec OR blocking I/O in callbacks |
| Use streams | Processing > 10k items OR reading large files |
| Use ETS | Read:write ratio > 10:1 AND concurrent access |
## Gates — before reporting
Do these **in order** for the performance review. Do not publish findings until each step passes.
1. **Protocol loaded** — Read [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) and apply its checks for each finding (hot paths, concurrency, resource use). **Pass:** For every substantive finding, you can name which protocol subsection you satisfied or state **N/A** with reason (e.g. pure reference to this skill’s Valid Patterns).
2. **Anchored evidence** — **Pass:** Each finding includes a concrete locator: `path:line` (or line range), or `Module.function/arity` plus a short quoted snippet from the file.
3. **Performance claims** — For anything under [Context-Sensitive Rules](#context-sensitive-rules), or any claim of bottleneck, N+1, unbounded growth, or heavy memory/binary cost, **Pass:** You state the **observed or measured** fact that meets “Flag ONLY IF” (e.g. rate, item count, ratio), or attach an artifact (profiler output, SQL/log excerpt, `grep`/search scope)—otherwise downgrade to **question** / **suspected** with what was not verified.
## Before Submitting Findings
Complete **Gates — before reporting** (section above) first; the verification protocol is mandatory input to those gates.