weight-elicitation
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/weight-elicitation**Purpose:** Determine relative weights for evaluation criteria through structured methods, supporting AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, Simos, and other weighting methods.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/weight-elicitationView on GitHub ↗
--- name: weight-elicitation description: Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods. used-by: multi-criteria-scoring --- # Weight Elicitation **Purpose:** Determine relative weights for evaluation criteria through structured methods, supporting AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, Simos, and other weighting methods. **When to use:** - Need to determine criteria importance ranking and quantified weights - Multiple stakeholders disagree on weights - Need to compare result differences across weighting methods ## Budget | Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range | |----------|--------|------------| | criterion-definition | 5-8 criteria | 4-9 | | weight-elicitation-sop | ≥2 methods | 2-3 | | rank-comparison | 1 comparison | 1 | ## State Ledger ```yaml strategy: weight-elicitation status: pending criteria_defined: false method_1: null method_2: null weights_1: [] weights_2: [] compared: false final_weights: [] ``` ## Available Tactics - **multi-method-triangulation** — Multi-method comparison to ensure weight robustness ## Available SOPs ### Import - criterion-definition - weight-elicitation-sop - rank-comparison ### Subagent - method-sensitivity-report ## Execution Guidance 1. Invoke criterion-definition to confirm criteria to be weighted 2. Select >=2 weighting methods (recommended: AHP + BWM or Swing + Simos) 3. Invoke weight-elicitation-sop separately for each method to compute weights 4. Invoke rank-comparison to compare weight ranking consistency 5. If significant differences exist, analyze causes and select the most suitable method for the scenario 6. Output final weight vector ## Output Format ```markdown ## Weight Determination Results ### Weight Comparison | Criterion | AHP Weight | BWM Weight | Average | Difference | |-----------|------------|------------|---------|------------| ### Consistency Check - AHP CR: [value] (< 0.1 ✓) - BWM ξ*: [value] ### Final Weights | Criterion | Weight | Rank | |-----------|--------|------| ### Method Selection Rationale [Why the chosen method's weights are used as the final result] ```
More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
- ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
- ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
- ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
- ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
- abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
- abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
- abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
- abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
- abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.