scope-assessment
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/scope-assessment评估研究问题的范围 — 判断太宽、合适、还是太窄,并给出调整建议。
SKILL.md
.github/skills/scope-assessmentView on GitHub ↗
---
name: scope-assessment
description: "SOP: 评估研究问题的范围是否合适(太宽/合适/太窄)"
version: 1.0.0
category: hypothesis-formation
type: sop
campaign: research-question
input: "研究问题(RQ)"
output: "范围判定 + 调整建议"
dependencies:
skills:
- subagent-spawning
---
# Scope Assessment
评估研究问题的范围 — 判断太宽、合适、还是太窄,并给出调整建议。
## HARD-GATE
<HARD-GATE>
输入必须包含: 至少 1 个完整表述的研究问题。
</HARD-GATE>
## Pipeline
1. **前置检查**: RQ 是否为完整句子
2. **维度分析**: 识别 RQ 中的限定维度(时间/地点/人群/方法/现象)
3. **可回答性判断**: 这个问题需要多大规模的研究来回答?
4. **范围判定**: 太宽 / 合适 / 太窄
5. **调整建议**: 如果不合适,建议具体调整方向
6. **输出**: 判定结果 + 理由 + 调整建议
## Judgment Criteria
- **太宽**: 需要一本书 / 多篇论文 / 无法设计单一实验
- **合适**: 一篇论文可以回答 / 可以设计明确的研究方案
- **太窄**: 答案显而易见 / 缺乏理论贡献 / trivial
## Output Format
```
Scope: TOO_BROAD / APPROPRIATE / TOO_NARROW
Rationale: [一句话理由]
Dimensions: [当前限定维度列表]
Suggestion: [调整方向] (only if not APPROPRIATE)
```
More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
- ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
- ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
- ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
- ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
- abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
- abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
- abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
- abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
- abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.