quality-gate-check

$npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/quality-gate-check

Quality Gate Check validates format and logic of input outputs

  • Identifies missing necessary fields in inputs.
  • Uses APIs to validate reference sources' existence.
  • Decides on output based on comprehensive checks including format, logic, and completeness.
  • Delivers results as a judgment with issue list for further action.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/quality-gate-checkView on GitHub ↗
---
name: quality-gate-check
description: "Shared SOP: 通用质量门检查（格式完整性、逻辑一致性）"
version: 1.0.0
category: hypothesis-formation
type: sop
shared: true
campaigns:
  - gap-prioritization
  - hypothesis-formulation
  - research-question
input: "任意产出物（gap 列表 / 假设 / RQ）"
output: "通过/不通过 + 问题列表"
dependencies:
  skills:
    - subagent-spawning
---

# Quality Gate Check

通用质量门检查 — 验证产出物的格式完整性和逻辑一致性。

## HARD-GATE

<HARD-GATE>
输入必须包含: 至少 1 个需要检查的产出物。
</HARD-GATE>

## Pipeline

1. **前置检查**: 产出物是否非空
2. **格式完整性**: 是否包含所有必要字段
3. **逻辑一致性**: 各部分之间是否矛盾
4. **引用完整性**: 引用的来源是否存在
5. **可操作性**: 产出是否足够具体可执行
6. **综合判定**: PASS / FAIL
7. **输出**: 判定 + 问题列表（如有）

## Check Dimensions

| 维度 | 检查内容 | FAIL 条件 |
|------|---------|----------|
| 格式完整性 | 必要字段是否齐全 | 缺少必要字段 |
| 逻辑一致性 | 各部分是否矛盾 | 存在内部矛盾 |
| 引用完整性 | 引用来源是否可追溯 | 引用无法验证 |
| 可操作性 | 是否足够具体 | 过于抽象无法执行 |
| 无歧义性 | 是否有多种解读 | 关键术语有歧义 |

## Output Format

```
Judgment: PASS / FAIL
Issues found: [数量]
Issue list:
  1. [维度]: [具体问题] — [修正建议]
  2. ...
Severity: CRITICAL / MINOR (per issue)
```

More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

SkillDescription
abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.