narrative-framing
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/narrative-framingConstructs theory-driven narratives by guiding evidence-based reading
- Solves complex literature analysis by building structured arguments from themes
- Uses paper-search, paper-research, thematic-coding, and web-research tools
- Decides based on intellectual judgment and pattern recognition across sources
- Delivers a coherent, evidence-supported argument with counter-evidence synthesis
SKILL.md
.github/skills/narrative-framingView on GitHub ↗
--- name: narrative-framing description: Theory-driven reading tactic — define a theoretical framework first, then guide reading to fill it with evidence. Five stages (theme identification, argument construction, evidence collection, counter-evidence, synthesis). The most intellectually demanding tactic. execution: tactic used-by: literature-survey --- # Narrative Framing Define a theoretical framework first, then guide reading to fill it with evidence. ## Stages 1. **Theme identification** — from initial reading, identify 3-5 major themes 2. **Argument construction** — define the narrative arc (thesis → evidence → synthesis) 3. **Evidence collection** — targeted reading to support each theme 4. **Counter-evidence** — actively search for work that challenges the narrative 5. **Synthesis** — weave themes into coherent argument ## Available SOPs - `paper-search` (import) — targeted reading for evidence - `paper-research` (import) — deep reading of key supporting/opposing papers - `thematic-coding` (subagent) — identify patterns across papers - `web-research` (import) — blogs, opinion pieces, industry perspectives ## Execution Guidance - This is the most "intellectual" tactic — requires judgment about what matters - thematic-coding helps identify patterns across papers - CC must actively seek counter-evidence (intellectual honesty) - Output is not a list but a structured argument - Themes should emerge from reading, not be imposed a priori