counterfactual-scenario-construction
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/counterfactual-scenario-constructionConstructs counterfactual scenarios by altering specified factors and analyzing outcomes
- Solves tasks requiring analysis of alternative realities with modified inputs
- Relies on subagent execution and internal reasoning for consistency
- Evaluates cascading effects and maintains logical coherence in scenarios
- Returns structured results including conclusions and consistency status
SKILL.md
.github/skills/counterfactual-scenario-constructionView on GitHub ↗
--- name: counterfactual-scenario-construction description: Construct precise, internally consistent counterfactual scenarios where specified factors are altered, then reason about the resulting conclusion. execution: subagent prompt: ./prompt.md input: artifact (string), factor_to_change (string), change_specification (string) used-by: [counterfactual-probing] --- # Counterfactual Scenario Construction Builds precise counterfactual worlds where specified factors differ from actuality. ## Execution Subagent — spawned via subagent-spawning/spawn-agent. ## Why Subagent Scenario construction requires careful reasoning about cascading effects of changes while maintaining internal consistency. ## Input - **artifact**: The original artifact - **factor_to_change**: Which factor to alter - **change_specification**: How to alter it (remove, weaken, strengthen, invert) ## Output - **scenario**: The counterfactual world description - **conclusion_status**: holds/weakened/flipped/indeterminate - **cascading_effects**: What else changes as a result - **consistency_check**: Whether the scenario is internally consistent ## Budget One unit = one scenario construction per factor change.
More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
- ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
- ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
- ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
- ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
- abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
- abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
- abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
- abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
- abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.