claim-decomposition
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/claim-decompositionParses patent claims into their structural components — identifying independent vs. dependent claims, extracting individual elements, and mapping features to technical domains.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/claim-decompositionView on GitHub ↗
--- name: claim-decomposition description: Independent/dependent claim parsing, element extraction, and feature mapping to technical domains execution: tactic used-by: patent-mining --- # Claim Decomposition Parses patent claims into their structural components — identifying independent vs. dependent claims, extracting individual elements, and mapping features to technical domains. ## Stages ### 1. Independent Claim Identification - Identify all independent claims (method, apparatus, system, composition) - Determine claim category (process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter) - Extract the preamble, transitional phrase, and body of each independent claim ### 2. Dependent Claim Tree Construction - Map dependency relationships (which claims depend on which) - Build the full claim tree hierarchy - Identify claim sets (groups of dependents narrowing the same independent) ### 3. Element Extraction - Parse each claim into individual elements (limitations) - Identify structural elements vs. functional elements - Extract means-plus-function limitations and their corresponding structure ### 4. Feature Mapping to Technical Domains - Map extracted elements to technical feature categories - Identify which elements correspond to known technology components - Create feature-to-claim mapping for scope analysis ## Available SOPs | SOP | Role | |-----|------| | claim-parsing | Core parsing of claim text into structured elements | | patent-categorization | Classify claim elements by technical domain | | quality-scoring | Assess claim quality based on structure and specificity | ## Execution Guidance - Always start with independent claims — they define the broadest protection - Transitional phrases matter: "comprising" (open) vs. "consisting of" (closed) - Means-plus-function claims (35 USC 112(f)) have narrower scope than they appear - Method claims and apparatus claims may cover the same invention differently - Count elements carefully — more elements = narrower claim scope ## Yield Report Report to calling strategy after each execution: - Number of claims parsed (independent + dependent) - Total elements extracted - Claim tree depth (max dependency chain) - Feature categories identified
More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
- ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
- ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
- ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
- ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
- abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
- abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
- abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
- abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
- abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.