answering-sequence-design

$npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/answering-sequence-design

Determines optimal answer sequence for subquestions based on dependencies

  • Solves the problem of finding the best order to answer interdependent subquestions
  • Relies on dependency graphs from dependency-mapping and subagent-spawning
  • Uses topological sorting, risk analysis, and resource constraints to determine order
  • Returns a phased execution plan with parallel opportunities and failure risk notes

SKILL.md

.github/skills/answering-sequence-designView on GitHub ↗
---
name: answering-sequence-design
description: "SOP: 设计子问题的最优回答顺序"
version: 1.0.0
category: hypothesis-formation
type: sop
campaign: research-question
input: "子问题列表 + 依赖图"
output: "执行序列 + 理由 + 并行机会"
dependencies:
  skills:
    - subagent-spawning
---

# Answering Sequence Design

设计子问题的最优回答顺序 — 基于依赖关系和资源效率。

## HARD-GATE

<HARD-GATE>
输入必须包含: 子问题列表 + 依赖图（来自 dependency-mapping）。
</HARD-GATE>

## Pipeline

1. **前置检查**: 依赖图是否无循环
2. **拓扑排序**: 基于依赖关系确定基本顺序
3. **并行分组**: 识别可同时进行的子问题
4. **资源优化**: 考虑资源约束调整顺序
5. **风险排序**: 高风险/高不确定性的优先（fail fast）
6. **最终序列**: 综合以上因素确定最优序列
7. **输出**: 执行序列 + 分阶段计划 + 并行机会

## Output Format

```
Phase 1 (parallel): [SQ1, SQ3] — no mutual dependencies
Phase 2 (sequential): [SQ2] — depends on SQ1
Phase 3 (parallel): [SQ4, SQ5] — depend on SQ2
Rationale: [为什么这个顺序最优]
Risk note: [哪些子问题如果失败会影响后续]
```

More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

SkillDescription
abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.