adversarial-stress-testing
$
npx mdskill add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/adversarial-stress-testing**Core Question:** Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions?
SKILL.md
.github/skills/adversarial-stress-testingView on GitHub ↗
--- name: adversarial-stress-testing description: "Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper." type: campaign produces: AdversarialStressReport artifact-types: [gap, hypothesis, research-question, idea, approach, experiment-design, claim] --- # Adversarial Stress Testing **Core Question:** Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? ## Methodology Sources - Lakatos (1976) — Proofs and Refutations: counterexample-driven refinement - Dutilh Novaes (2016) — Adversarial argumentation as dialogical practice - Clarke BVA — Boundary Value Analysis for systematic edge testing - Flyvbjerg (2006) — Critical case methodology: most-likely/least-likely selection - Popper (1959) — Falsificationism: seek conditions where claims break ## Strategy Routing | Artifact Type | Primary Strategy | Rationale | |---|---|---| | claim, hypothesis | assumption-negation | Direct logical attack | | gap, research-question | lakatos-heuristics | Counterexample refinement | | idea, approach | boundary-enumeration | Parameter space testing | | experiment-design | critical-case-design | Decisive test selection | | any (synthesis) | validity-envelope-mapping | Comprehensive envelope | ## Budget Table | Resource | S | M | L | |---|---|---|---| | Negation derivation chains | 3 | 6 | 10 | | Counterexamples/boundary cases | 5 | 12 | 25 | | Parameter dimensions | 3 | 6 | 10 | | Validity envelope dimensions | 2 | 4 | 6 | ## Tactics - contradiction-derivation — Negate, derive, detect contradiction - boundary-probing — Map parameter space, test extremes, find breakpoints - counterexample-heuristics — Generate monsters, bar or incorporate ## Context Management - Persist derivation chains and counterexamples across rounds - Track which negations produced genuine contradictions vs. benign outcomes - Accumulate validity envelope boundaries incrementally ## Output Produces `AdversarialStressReport` containing: identified breakpoints, validity envelope, surviving refined claims, and confidence assessment.
More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- abductive-hypothesis-generationStrategy: 面对异常的最佳解释推理
- ablation-brainstormRemove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden dependencies and generate ideas from structural gaps.
- ablation-component-mappingMap system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
- ablation-designDesign ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems
- ablation-executionRemove components one by one from a system, record the response/impact of each removal.
- abp-vulnerability-classificationClassify assumptions on 2 axes — load-bearing (how much conclusion depends on it) × vulnerable (how likely to be false). Focuses attention on High-Load × High-Vulnerable quadrant.
- abstraction-extractionExtract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms.
- abstraction-ladderPerform bisociation at multiple abstraction levels
- abstraction-ladderingMove between concrete and abstract framings — 3 levels up (Why?) and 3 levels down (How?) to find the most productive research level.
- abstraction-to-designAbstract biological principle to design principle. Bridge from biology to engineering.