task-decomposition

$npx mdskill add rohitg00/skillkit/task-decomposition

Breaks down complex tasks into atomic, independently completable units.

  • Solves the problem of overwhelming, large tasks by creating a step-by-step plan.
  • Depends on user-provided task description and context for decomposition.
  • Uses vertical slicing and milestone breakdowns to identify dependencies and subtasks.
  • Delivers a structured task list with dependency graph and milestone breakdown.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/task-decompositionView on GitHub ↗
---
name: task-decomposition
description: Breaks down complex software, writing, or research tasks into small, atomic, independently completable units with dependency graphs and milestone breakdowns. Use when the user asks to plan a project, decompose a feature, create subtasks, split up work, or needs help organizing a large piece of work into a step-by-step plan. Triggered by phrases like "break down", "decompose", "where do I start", "too big", "split into tasks", "work breakdown", or "task list".
version: 1.0.0
triggers:
  - break down
  - decompose
  - split into tasks
  - too big
  - where to start
  - complex task
tags:
  - planning
  - decomposition
  - tasks
  - organization
difficulty: beginner
estimatedTime: 10
relatedSkills:
  - planning/design-first
  - planning/verification-gates
---

# Task Decomposition

You are breaking down a complex task into smaller, atomic units. Each unit should be independently completable and verifiable.

## Core Principle

**If a task feels too big, it is too big. Break it down until each piece is obvious.**

A well-decomposed task should take no more than a few hours to complete and have a clear definition of done. Aim for tasks that are small, independent, testable, and clearly scoped.

## Decomposition Techniques

### 1. Vertical Slicing

Break by user-visible functionality (each slice is deployable and testable independently):

```
Feature: User Registration
  Slice 1: Email/password signup — form, validation, account creation
  Slice 2: Email verification — send email, verify link, UI state
  Slice 3: Social login (OAuth) — Google button, OAuth flow, account link
```

### 2. Horizontal Layering

Break by system layer:

```
Feature: Order Processing
  Layer 1: Data Model       — entities, migrations
  Layer 2: Data Access      — repository, CRUD, queries
  Layer 3: Business Logic   — service, validation rules
  Layer 4: API Endpoints    — routes, error handling
  Layer 5: Frontend         — form, API client, loading/error states
```

### 3. Workflow Decomposition

Break by process steps:

```
Task: Checkout flow
  Step 1: Cart validation   — stock check, quantities, totals
  Step 2: Payment           — collect details, validate, process
  Step 3: Order creation    — record, payment link, inventory update
  Step 4: Confirmation      — email, success page, invoice
```

### 4. Component Decomposition

Break by UI or system component:

```
Task: Dashboard page
  Component 1: Header       — logo, nav, user menu
  Component 2: Stats cards  — revenue, orders, customers
  Component 3: Chart        — sales trend, data fetch/transform
  Component 4: Orders table — sort, pagination, row actions
```

> For more detailed worked examples of each technique, see `EXAMPLES.md`.

## Task Template

For each decomposed task, define:

```markdown
## Task: [Brief Title]

**Description:**
[What needs to be done in 1-2 sentences]

**Files to Create/Modify:**
- [ ] path/to/file1.ts
- [ ] path/to/file2.ts

**Steps:**
1. [First specific step]
2. [Second specific step]
3. [Third specific step]

**Done When:**
- [ ] [Success criterion 1]
- [ ] [Success criterion 2]
- [ ] Tests pass

**Dependencies:**
- Requires: [Other task if any]
- Blocks: [What this enables]
```

## Dependency Management

### Identify Dependencies

```
Task Graph:

[Data Model] ──┬──▶ [Repository]
               │
               └──▶ [API Types]
                        │
[Repository] ──────────▶ [Service]
                              │
[API Types] ──────────────────┤
                              ▼
                         [API Endpoints]
```

### Minimize Dependencies

- Prefer tasks that can run in parallel
- Use interfaces to decouple dependencies
- Start with foundational tasks first

### Order by Dependencies

```
Phase 1 (No dependencies):
- Task A: Data model
- Task B: API type definitions
- Task C: UI component skeletons

Phase 2 (Depends on Phase 1):
- Task D: Repository (needs A)
- Task E: API client (needs B)
- Task F: UI logic (needs C)

Phase 3 (Depends on Phase 2):
- Task G: Service (needs D)
- Task H: Connected UI (needs E, F)
```

## Decomposition Checklist

For each task, verify:

- [ ] **Atomic?** — Can be done without interruption
- [ ] **Clear?** — Scope is unambiguous
- [ ] **Testable?** — Know when it's done
- [ ] **Independent?** — Minimal dependencies
- [ ] **Small?** — Less than half a day

## Integration with Other Skills

- Use **design-first** to understand the full scope before decomposing
- Use **verification-gates** to define checkpoints between phases
- Use **testing/red-green-refactor** to implement each task

More from rohitg00/skillkit

SkillDescription
design-firstGuides the creation of technical design documents before writing code, producing architecture diagrams, data models, API interface definitions, implementation plans, and multi-option trade-off analyses. Use when the user asks to plan a feature, architect a system, design an API, explore implementation approaches, or requests a technical design or spec before coding — especially for complex features involving multiple components, ambiguous requirements, or significant architectural changes.
eval-injection-testSkill with injected eval patterns for security testing
handoff-protocolsManages work transitions between team members or agents by creating structured handoff documents, summarizing project status, documenting key decisions, blockers, and open questions, and generating onboarding briefs. Use when someone needs to hand off, hand over, or transition a project; pass work to another person or agent; brief a colleague taking over; prepare a shift change summary; or onboard someone mid-task. Produces ready-to-use handoff documents covering current status, next steps, known issues, technical context, and communication templates for both planned and unplanned transfers.
hypothesis-testingApplies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.
parallel-investigationCoordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.
red-green-refactorGuides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like 'make the test pass', 'test coverage', or 'unit tests before implementation'.
root-cause-analysisPerforms systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
skill-authoringCreates and structures SKILL.md files for AI coding agents, including YAML frontmatter, trigger phrases, directive instructions, decision trees, code examples, and verification checklists. Use when the user asks to write a new skill, create a skill file, author agent capabilities, generate skill documentation, or define a skill template for Claude Code agents.
structured-code-reviewPerforms a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".
test-patternsApplies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.