define-jtbd-canvas

$npx mdskill add product-on-purpose/pm-skills/define-jtbd-canvas

Creates a Jobs to be Done canvas for customer motivations

  • Identifies and captures functional, emotional, and social dimensions of customer jobs.
  • Depends on understanding customer needs and behaviors through research methods.
  • Decides what job to focus on by analyzing customer pain points and progress goals.
  • Delivers a comprehensive JTBD canvas for team alignment and product positioning.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/define-jtbd-canvasView on GitHub ↗
---
name: define-jtbd-canvas
description: Creates a Jobs to be Done canvas capturing the functional, emotional, and social dimensions of a customer job. Use when deeply understanding customer motivations, designing for jobs, or reframing product positioning.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  phase: define
  version: "2.1.0"
  updated: 2026-06-10
  category: problem-framing
  frameworks: [triple-diamond, lean-startup, design-thinking]
  author: product-on-purpose
---
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->
# Jobs to be Done Canvas

A Jobs to be Done (JTBD) canvas captures the complete picture of why customers "hire" products to make progress in their lives. Based on Clayton Christensen's framework, JTBD goes beyond features and demographics to understand the underlying motivations.functional, emotional, and social.that drive customer behavior.

## When to Use

- When deeply researching customer motivations before building
- To reframe product positioning around customer progress
- When existing personas feel too surface-level or demographic
- During competitive analysis to identify why customers switch
- When designing marketing messages that resonate
- To align team on who the customer really is and what they need

## When NOT to Use

- You need a person-shaped artifact (goals, behaviors, quotes) for design or marketing work -> use `foundation-persona`; the canvas captures the job, the persona captures the person
- You have no customer research yet -> synthesize interviews first with `discover-interview-synthesis`; the canvas's insights must trace to research, not assumptions
- You are framing one specific problem to solve now -> use `define-problem-statement`
- You need to map opportunities to a measurable outcome for prioritization -> use `define-opportunity-tree`

## Instructions

When asked to create a JTBD canvas, follow these steps:

1. **Identify the Job Performer**
   Define who is doing this job. Go beyond demographics to capture the circumstance they're in. The same person can have different jobs in different situations.

2. **Articulate the Circumstance**
   Describe when and where this job arises. Jobs are triggered by specific situations. Understanding context helps predict when customers will seek a solution.

3. **Write the Job Statement**
   Use the format: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [desired outcome]." The job statement captures the core progress the customer seeks.

4. **Define the Functional Job**
   What is the practical task the customer needs to accomplish? This is the tangible, measurable part of the job. Be specific about what "done" looks like.

5. **Capture the Emotional Job**
   How does the customer want to feel during and after the job? Emotional jobs often drive decisions more than functional ones. Include both desired feelings and feelings to avoid.

6. **Identify the Social Job**
   How does the customer want to be perceived by others? Social jobs relate to status, identity, and relationships. Not all jobs have strong social dimensions.

7. **Map Competing Solutions**
   What are customers currently "hiring" to do this job? Include direct competitors, indirect alternatives, and non-consumption (doing nothing). Understanding current solutions reveals what to compete against.

8. **Define Hiring Criteria**
   What makes customers choose one solution over another? What are the "must haves" vs. "nice to haves"? This informs positioning and prioritization.

## Output Format

Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md` to structure the output. A complete canvas fills every template section: Job Overview; Job Performer; The Circumstance; Job Statement; Functional Job; Emotional Job; Social Job; Competing Solutions; Hiring Criteria; Insights and Implications; Supporting Quotes; and Questions for Further Research.

## Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

- [ ] Job statement follows "When... I want... so I can..." format
- [ ] Circumstance is specific (not just "anytime")
- [ ] Functional job describes tangible outcome
- [ ] Emotional job includes how customer wants to feel
- [ ] Competing solutions include non-obvious alternatives
- [ ] Insights are based on research, not assumptions

## Examples

See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed example.

More from product-on-purpose/pm-skills

SkillDescription
define-hypothesisDefines a testable hypothesis with clear success metrics and a validation approach. Use when forming assumptions to test or aligning a team on what success looks like, before any experiment is designed. To design the A/B test or experiment that will validate the hypothesis, use measure-experiment-design.
define-opportunity-treeCreates an opportunity solution tree connecting a desired outcome to customer opportunities and candidate solutions, preventing solution-first jumps in continuous discovery. Use when structuring scattered feature ideas or communicating how the roadmap traces to outcomes. For ranking an existing flat list of candidates, use define-prioritization-framework instead; this skill discovers the list, it does not score one.
define-prioritization-frameworkRun applicable prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, Weighted Scoring, Kano) against a list of features or initiatives. Produces a comparison table showing where rankings agree and diverge across frameworks, and an executive summary with recommendation. Framework applicability is filtered by data availability; Kano requires customer research. Refuses to fabricate scores; produces an estimation scaffold when input data is missing.
define-problem-statementCreates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.
define-xFixture skill for phase-map and phase-router tests.
deliver-acceptance-criteriaGenerates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice, covering the happy path, key failure scenarios, and non-functional expectations in testable form. Use when turning requirements into verifiable scenarios for engineering handoff and QA sign-off. For a dedicated catalog of boundary conditions, error states, and recovery paths across a feature, use deliver-edge-cases; to write the stories themselves, use deliver-user-stories.
deliver-edge-casesDocuments edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.
deliver-launch-checklistCreates a cross-functional pre-launch checklist covering engineering, design, marketing, support, legal, and operations readiness, with owners, dates, and go/no-go criteria so nothing is missed before release. Use for significant or cross-team launches, not a small single-team change. For the customer-facing announcement of what shipped, use deliver-release-notes instead.
deliver-prdCreates a comprehensive Product Requirements Document that aligns stakeholders on what to build, why, and how success will be measured. Use when specifying features, epics, or product initiatives for engineering handoff.
deliver-release-notesCreates user-facing release notes that communicate new features, improvements, and fixes in clear, benefit-focused language. Use when shipping updates to communicate changes to users, customers, or stakeholders.