performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsf
$
npx mdskill add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsfScan Android APKs for secrets and flaws without execution.
- Detects hardcoded secrets, weak crypto, and insecure permissions.
- Depends on Mobile Security Framework v4.x for pattern analysis.
- Executes automated checks on APK or AAB files in CI/CD.
- Outputs structured vulnerability reports for security gate review.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsfView on GitHub ↗
---
name: performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsf
description: >
Performs automated static analysis of Android applications using Mobile Security Framework (MobSF)
to identify hardcoded secrets, insecure permissions, vulnerable components, weak cryptography,
and code-level security flaws without executing the application. Use when assessing Android APK/AAB
files for security vulnerabilities before deployment, during penetration testing, or as part of
CI/CD security gates. Activates for requests involving Android static analysis, MobSF scanning,
APK security assessment, or mobile application code review.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: mobile-security
author: mahipal
tags: [mobile-security, android, mobsf, static-analysis, owasp-mobile, penetration-testing]
version: 1.0.0
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Performing Android App Static Analysis with MobSF
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Conducting security assessment of Android APK or AAB files before production release
- Integrating automated mobile security scanning into CI/CD pipelines
- Performing initial triage of Android applications during penetration testing engagements
- Reviewing third-party Android applications for supply chain security risks
**Do not use** this skill as a replacement for manual code review or dynamic analysis -- MobSF static analysis catches pattern-based vulnerabilities but misses runtime logic flaws.
## Prerequisites
- MobSF v4.x installed via Docker (`docker pull opensecurity/mobile-security-framework-mobsf`) or local setup
- Target Android APK, AAB, or source code ZIP
- Python 3.10+ for MobSF REST API integration
- JADX decompiler (bundled with MobSF) for Java/Kotlin source recovery
- Network access to MobSF web interface (default: http://localhost:8000)
## Workflow
### Step 1: Deploy MobSF and Obtain API Key
Launch MobSF using Docker for isolated, reproducible scanning:
```bash
docker run -it --rm -p 8000:8000 opensecurity/mobile-security-framework-mobsf:latest
```
Retrieve the REST API key from the MobSF web interface at `http://localhost:8000/api_docs` or from the startup console output. The API key enables programmatic scanning.
### Step 2: Upload APK for Static Analysis
Upload the target APK using the MobSF REST API:
```bash
curl -F "file=@target_app.apk" http://localhost:8000/api/v1/upload \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>"
```
Response includes the `hash` identifier used for subsequent API calls. MobSF automatically decompiles the APK using JADX, extracts the AndroidManifest.xml, and indexes all resources.
### Step 3: Trigger and Retrieve Static Scan Results
Initiate the static scan and retrieve results:
```bash
# Trigger scan
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/scan \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "scan_type=apk&file_name=target_app.apk&hash=<FILE_HASH>"
# Retrieve JSON report
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/report_json \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>"
```
### Step 4: Analyze Critical Findings
MobSF static analysis covers these categories mapped to OWASP Mobile Top 10 2024:
**Manifest Analysis (M8 - Security Misconfiguration)**:
- Exported activities, services, receivers, and content providers without permission guards
- `android:debuggable="true"` left enabled
- `android:allowBackup="true"` enabling data extraction via ADB
- Missing `android:networkSecurityConfig` for certificate pinning
**Code Analysis (M1 - Improper Credential Usage)**:
- Hardcoded API keys, passwords, and tokens in Java/Kotlin source
- Insecure SharedPreferences usage for storing sensitive data
- Weak or broken cryptographic implementations (ECB mode, static IV, hardcoded keys)
**Network Security (M5 - Insecure Communication)**:
- Missing certificate pinning configuration
- Custom TrustManagers that accept all certificates
- Cleartext HTTP traffic allowed without exception domains
**Binary Analysis (M7 - Insufficient Binary Protections)**:
- Missing ProGuard/R8 obfuscation
- Native library vulnerabilities (stack canaries, NX bit, PIE)
- Debugger detection absence
### Step 5: Generate and Export Reports
Export findings in multiple formats for stakeholder communication:
```bash
# PDF report
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/download_pdf \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>" -o report.pdf
# JSON for programmatic processing
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/report_json \
-H "Authorization: <API_KEY>" \
-d "hash=<FILE_HASH>" -o report.json
```
### Step 6: Integrate into CI/CD Pipeline
Add MobSF scanning as a build gate:
```yaml
# GitHub Actions example
- name: MobSF Static Analysis
run: |
UPLOAD=$(curl -s -F "file=@app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release.apk" \
http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/upload -H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY")
HASH=$(echo $UPLOAD | jq -r '.hash')
curl -s -X POST http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/scan \
-H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY" \
-d "scan_type=apk&file_name=app-release.apk&hash=$HASH"
SCORE=$(curl -s -X POST http://mobsf:8000/api/v1/scorecard \
-H "Authorization: $MOBSF_API_KEY" -d "hash=$HASH" | jq '.security_score')
if [ "$SCORE" -lt 60 ]; then exit 1; fi
```
## Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|------|-----------|
| **Static Analysis** | Examination of application code and resources without executing the program; catches structural and pattern-based vulnerabilities |
| **APK Decompilation** | Process of recovering Java/Kotlin source from compiled Dalvik bytecode using tools like JADX or apktool |
| **AndroidManifest.xml** | Configuration file declaring app components, permissions, and security attributes; primary target for manifest analysis |
| **Certificate Pinning** | Technique binding an app to specific server certificates to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks via rogue CAs |
| **ProGuard/R8** | Code obfuscation and shrinking tools that make reverse engineering more difficult by renaming classes and removing unused code |
## Tools & Systems
- **MobSF**: Automated mobile security analysis framework supporting static and dynamic analysis of Android/iOS apps
- **JADX**: Dex-to-Java decompiler for recovering readable source code from Android APK files
- **apktool**: Tool for reverse engineering Android APK files, decoding resources to near-original form
- **Android Lint**: Google's static analysis tool for Android-specific code quality and security issues
- **Semgrep**: Pattern-based static analysis engine with mobile-specific rule packs for custom vulnerability detection
## Common Pitfalls
- **Ignoring false positives**: MobSF flags patterns like `password` in variable names even when not storing actual credentials. Triage all HIGH findings manually before reporting.
- **Missing obfuscated code**: Static analysis accuracy drops significantly against obfuscated apps. Supplement with dynamic analysis for apps using DexGuard or custom packers.
- **Outdated MobSF rules**: Security rules evolve with Android API levels. Ensure MobSF is updated to match the target app's `targetSdkVersion`.
- **Skipping native code analysis**: MobSF analyzes Java/Kotlin but has limited coverage of native C/C++ libraries. Use `checksec` and manual review for `.so` files.