workshop-facilitation-guide
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/workshop-facilitation-guideProduces a complete facilitation guide for any workshop — from a 90-minute problem-solving session to a full-day strategy workshop. Includes step-by-step activity instructions and facilitation moves for when things go off track.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/workshop-facilitation-guideView on GitHub ↗
---
name: workshop-facilitation-guide
description: "Design and facilitate any workshop, working session, or collaborative meeting. Use when asked to plan a workshop, design a facilitated session, run a ideation session, or create a workshop agenda. Produces a complete facilitation guide with session design, activity instructions, timing, and materials."
---
# Workshop Facilitation Guide Skill
Produces a complete facilitation guide for any workshop — from a 90-minute problem-solving session to a full-day strategy workshop. Includes step-by-step activity instructions and facilitation moves for when things go off track.
## Required Inputs
Ask the user for these if not provided:
- **Workshop goal** (what decision or output should exist at the end?)
- **Participants** (number, roles, mix of seniority)
- **Duration** (90 min / half day / full day / multi-day)
- **Format** (in-person / remote / hybrid)
- **Known tensions** (optional — pre-existing conflicts or disagreements to navigate)
- **Non-negotiables** (anything that cannot be decided or changed in the room)
## Output Structure
---
# Workshop Facilitation Guide: [Session Name]
**Date:** [TBD / as provided]
**Duration:** [X hours]
**Participants:** [N people, roles]
**Format:** [In-person / Remote / Hybrid]
**Facilitator:** [Leave for user]
---
## Workshop Objectives
By the end of this session, the group will have:
1. [Specific output 1 — e.g. "Agreed on the top 3 priorities for Q3"]
2. [Specific output 2]
3. [Specific output 3]
**How we will know it worked:** [Observable test for success — e.g. "Everyone can name the agreed priorities without looking at their notes"]
---
## Pre-Workshop Preparation
**Facilitator:**
- [ ] Confirm objectives with session sponsor (30 min pre-read call recommended)
- [ ] Send pre-read to participants [X days before] — max 2 pages
- [ ] Prepare all materials (printed / Miro boards / slides)
- [ ] Set up room or virtual space
**Participants (pre-work):**
- [Specific pre-work — max 20 minutes. If more, fewer people do it]
---
## Full Agenda
| Time | Activity | Duration | Format | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [00:00] | Welcome and framing | 10 min | Facilitator-led | Shared expectations |
| [00:10] | [Activity 1] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
| [00:X] | [Activity 2] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
| [00:X] | Break | 15 min | — | — |
| [00:X] | [Activity 3] | [X min] | [Format] | [Output] |
| [00:X] | Decisions and next steps | 20 min | Whole group | Committed actions |
| [00:X] | Close | 10 min | Facilitator-led | Energy and commitment |
---
## Activity Instructions
For each activity:
### Activity [N]: [Name]
**Purpose:** [Why this activity at this moment]
**Time:** [X minutes]
**Format:** [Individual / Pairs / Small groups / Whole group]
**Materials:** [Post-its, Miro, printed sheets, etc.]
**Instructions to give participants:**
> "[Exact words to say when launching the activity — unambiguous, no jargon]"
**Step-by-step:**
1. [What happens in minute 0–X]
2. [What happens next]
3. [How to consolidate and move forward]
**If the group gets stuck:** [Specific facilitation move — e.g. "Ask each person to write one idea silently before sharing"]
**Watch out for:** [Common failure mode — e.g. "One voice dominating. Use round-robin to surface quieter participants"]
**Time warning:** [What to do if running long — e.g. "Skip the prioritisation vote and let facilitator propose the top 3"]
---
## Decision-Making Protocol
Agree this with the group at the start:
**How decisions will be made in this session:**
- [ ] Consensus (everyone must actively agree)
- [ ] Consent (no one has a blocking objection)
- [ ] Majority vote (50%+1)
- [ ] Facilitator/sponsor decides after hearing input
**What happens with unresolved disagreements:** [Parking lot / escalate to sponsor / decide by [person] after session]
---
## Facilitation Moves (Quick Reference)
| Situation | Move |
|---|---|
| Silence after a question | "Take 2 minutes to write your thoughts before we share" |
| One person dominating | "Let's hear from someone we haven't heard from yet" |
| Off-topic tangent | "That's important — let me put it in the parking lot. Back to [focus]" |
| Group stuck, no ideas | "What would [competitor / different industry] do here?" |
| No consensus, running out of time | "Let's do a quick dot vote to identify the strongest options" |
| Energy low after lunch | "Stand up and tell the person next to you your one key takeaway so far" |
---
## Close: Commitments and Next Steps
End every session with:
1. **What did we decide?** — Read back every decision made. Ask: "Does anyone have a concern with how I've captured this?"
2. **What will we do?** — Specific actions, named owners, concrete deadlines
3. **Who needs to know?** — Who will communicate outputs to absent stakeholders, and how?
4. **When do we meet again?** — Schedule the follow-up before the room empties
---
## Quality Checks
- [ ] Workshop objective is a specific output, not a vague goal ("aligned on strategy")
- [ ] All activities have explicit timing and format
- [ ] A decision-making protocol is agreed at the start
- [ ] Activities alternate between individual work and group work
- [ ] Parking lot is used actively (not a graveyard)
- [ ] Close captures decisions and actions before the room empties
## Example Trigger Phrases
- "Design a workshop for [goal] with [group]"
- "Plan a facilitated session to [outcome]"
- "Help me run a [type] workshop with my team"
- "Create a facilitation guide for [topic]"
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- 360-feedback-templateDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
- ab-test-plannerDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
- accessibility-auditGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
- account-planBuild a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.
- aeo-optimizerOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — restructuring content so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Rewrites headings as questions, drops 50-80 word answer capsules, audits paragraph length, and flags trust signals. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines.
- ai-ethics-reviewConduct an ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when asked to run an AI ethics review, assess AI risks, audit a model for bias, or produce an AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with prioritised mitigations.
- ai-product-canvasStructure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.
- ambiguity-resolverStructure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan.
- api-docs-writerWrite clear, developer-facing API documentation. Use when asked to document an API endpoint, write API reference docs, create a developer guide, or turn a raw spec/Postman collection into documentation. Produces endpoint documentation with descriptions, parameters, request/response examples, and error codes.
- api-versioning-strategyWrite an API versioning strategy document for a service or API platform. Use when asked to define versioning policy, plan API deprecation, classify breaking changes, or document version lifecycle. Produces a complete versioning strategy with breaking-change classification table, deprecation timeline, migration guide template, and client communication template.