stakeholder-update
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/stakeholder-updateThis skill creates effective status updates for executives and stakeholders following the BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) principle.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/stakeholder-updateView on GitHub ↗
--- name: stakeholder-update description: "Create concise executive stakeholder updates using the BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) framework. Use when asked to write a status update, progress report, project communication, or executive briefing for leadership or stakeholders. Produces a BLUF-led update with status, key metrics, risks, upcoming milestones, and decisions needed — readable in under 2 minutes." --- # Stakeholder Update Skill This skill creates effective status updates for executives and stakeholders following the BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) principle. ## Required Inputs Ask the user for these if not provided: - **Project or product being reported on** - **Audience** (CEO, board, cross-functional leads, investors — changes depth and format) - **Period** (this week / this sprint / this month) - **Current status** (on track / at risk / blocked) - **Key metrics** and their current values vs. targets ## Update Structure ### 1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) Start with the most important information: - **Status**: 🟢 On track / 🟡 At risk / 🔴 Blocked / ✅ Complete - **Key Takeaway**: One sentence summary of current state - **Action Needed**: What you need from stakeholders (if anything) ### 2. Progress Summary Brief overview of accomplishments: - What shipped this period - Milestones achieved - Key metrics movement Keep to 3-5 bullet points maximum. ### 3. Metrics Dashboard **Key Metrics** | Metric | Current | Target | Trend | Status | |--------|---------|--------|-------|--------| | [Metric name] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑/→/↓ | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | Include 3-5 most important metrics only. ### 4. Risks & Blockers **High Priority Issues:** - **Issue**: Brief description - **Impact**: What's at stake - **Mitigation**: What you're doing about it - **Help Needed**: What stakeholders can do (if applicable) Only include issues that matter at executive level. ### 5. Upcoming Milestones **Next 30 Days:** - Milestone (expected date) - Milestone (expected date) **Next 90 Days:** - Major milestone (month) - Major milestone (month) ### 6. Decisions Needed (if applicable) - **Decision**: Clear description - **Options**: 2-3 options with pros/cons - **Recommendation**: What you recommend and why - **Timeline**: When decision is needed ## Writing Guidelines **Tone**: Professional, concise, action-oriented **Length**: Keep under 1 page (or 2 minutes reading time) **Frequency**: Weekly for active projects, bi-weekly for maintenance **Executive Communication Principles:** 1. **Lead with conclusions, not process** - ❌ "We ran 5 experiments this week and analyzed the data..." - ✅ "Conversion rate increased 15% from optimization work" 2. **Focus on impact, not activities** - ❌ "Held 12 customer interviews" - ✅ "Identified #1 barrier to adoption (complexity of setup)" 3. **Make problems visible early** - Don't sugarcoat risks - Propose solutions, not just problems - Be specific about help needed 4. **Use data to tell story** - Quantify whenever possible - Show trends, not just snapshots - Connect metrics to business outcomes 5. **Make it scannable** - Use headers and bullet points - Bold key information - Use visual indicators (🟢🟡🔴, ↑→↓) ## Status Guidelines **🟢 On Track**: Meeting all targets, no significant risks **🟡 At Risk**: Potential issues that could impact delivery **🔴 Blocked**: Critical issues preventing progress, needs intervention ## Example Update ``` # Product Update: Customer Onboarding Redesign **Week of Jan 20, 2026** ## BLUF **Status**: 🟡 At Risk **Key Takeaway**: New onboarding flow is performing well in tests (+35% completion), but launch delayed one week due to integration issues with billing system. **Action Needed**: Decision needed on whether to launch onboarding separately or wait for billing integration fix. ## Progress Summary - Completed user testing with 24 participants (94% positive feedback) - Implemented first-time user experience improvements - Resolved 12 of 15 bugs identified in QA - Engineering allocated resources to billing integration fix ## Key Metrics | Metric | Current | Target | Trend | Status | |--------|---------|--------|-------|--------| | Onboarding Completion | 45% | 60% | → | 🟡 | | Time to First Value | 4.2 min | 3.0 min | ↓ | 🟢 | | Setup Support Tickets | 45/week | <30/week | ↓ | 🟢 | | User Activation Rate | 52% | 65% | → | 🟡 | ## Risks & Blockers **HIGH: Billing System Integration Delay** - **Impact**: Prevents users from completing onboarding flow; delays launch by 1-2 weeks - **Root Cause**: API deprecation by payment processor, requires code rewrite - **Mitigation**: Engineering team reallocated resources, fix ETA Feb 3 - **Decision Needed**: Launch onboarding without payment integration or wait for fix? (See below) **MEDIUM: Mobile Testing Coverage** - **Impact**: Some edge cases on older Android devices not tested - **Mitigation**: Partnering with QA to expand test matrix; running beta with internal users on diverse devices ## Upcoming Milestones **Next 30 Days:** - Resolve billing integration (Feb 3) - Launch onboarding redesign (Feb 5 or Feb 12 depending on decision) - Begin measuring impact on conversion (Feb 12) **Next 90 Days:** - Iterate based on production data (March) - Extend to mobile app (April) - Launch advanced features (May) ## Decision Needed **Should we launch onboarding separately from billing integration?** **Option A: Launch Now (Recommended)** - Pros: Get 35% completion rate improvement to users immediately, gather production data, maintain momentum - Cons: Users need to complete payment in old flow, slightly disjointed experience - Timeline: Launch Feb 5 **Option B: Wait for Billing Fix** - Pros: Fully integrated experience from day one, no technical debt - Cons: Delays benefits by 2 weeks, Q1 metric targets at risk, team momentum lost - Timeline: Launch Feb 12 **Recommendation**: Option A. The onboarding improvements are valuable independently, and the old payment flow works fine. Waiting risks missing Q1 targets and delays validated improvements from reaching users. **Timeline**: Need decision by Jan 22 for Feb 5 launch. --- **Questions?** Reply to this email or ping me on Slack. ``` ## Frequency Guidance **Daily standups**: - Ultra-brief (3 bullets) - What shipped yesterday - What's shipping today - Blockers **Weekly updates**: - Use full template above - Focus on progress and risks - Keep to 1 page **Monthly reviews**: - Deeper metrics analysis - Strategic reflections - Quarterly goal progress - Longer format (2-3 pages) acceptable **Quarterly business reviews**: - Comprehensive analysis - Trends over time - Strategic recommendations - Presentation format ## Adaptation by Audience ### For C-Suite - Lead with business impact - Connect to company OKRs - Focus on strategy and outcomes - Minimize technical details ### For Product/Engineering Leadership - Include technical context - Show sprint/milestone progress - Discuss architecture implications - Reference technical debt ### For Cross-Functional Teams - Balance technical and business context - Highlight dependencies - Call out collaboration needs - Make asks explicit ### For Board/Investors - Focus on metrics and traction - Competitive positioning - Market opportunities - Financial implications ## Quality Checks - [ ] Update leads with BLUF — status, key takeaway, and action needed before any detail - [ ] Every metric has a target comparison (not just a raw number) - [ ] Every risk has a mitigation and a "help needed" flag if stakeholder action is required - [ ] Decisions needed have specific options and a clear recommendation - [ ] Total length is under 1 page / 2 minutes reading time
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- 360-feedback-templateDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
- ab-test-plannerDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
- accessibility-auditGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
- account-planBuild a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.
- aeo-optimizerOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — restructuring content so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Rewrites headings as questions, drops 50-80 word answer capsules, audits paragraph length, and flags trust signals. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines.
- ai-ethics-reviewConduct an ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when asked to run an AI ethics review, assess AI risks, audit a model for bias, or produce an AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with prioritised mitigations.
- ai-product-canvasStructure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.
- ambiguity-resolverStructure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan.
- api-docs-writerWrite clear, developer-facing API documentation. Use when asked to document an API endpoint, write API reference docs, create a developer guide, or turn a raw spec/Postman collection into documentation. Produces endpoint documentation with descriptions, parameters, request/response examples, and error codes.
- api-versioning-strategyWrite an API versioning strategy document for a service or API platform. Use when asked to define versioning policy, plan API deprecation, classify breaking changes, or document version lifecycle. Produces a complete versioning strategy with breaking-change classification table, deprecation timeline, migration guide template, and client communication template.