rice-impact-matrix
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/rice-impact-matrixProduce a prioritisation output that balances quantitative RICE scoring with qualitative strategic fit — because the highest RICE score isn't always the right next bet.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/rice-impact-matrixView on GitHub ↗
--- name: rice-impact-matrix description: "Score features using RICE and plot against strategic alignment for nuanced prioritisation. Use when asked to prioritise features, build a priority matrix, combine quantitative scoring with strategic fit, or decide what to build next with multiple competing initiatives. Produces a scored priority matrix with RICE scores, strategic alignment ratings, quadrant placement, and sequencing recommendations." --- # RICE + Strategic Alignment Skill Produce a prioritisation output that balances quantitative RICE scoring with qualitative strategic fit — because the highest RICE score isn't always the right next bet. ## Required Inputs Ask the user for these if not provided: - **List of initiatives or features to prioritise** (names and brief descriptions) - **Current strategic priorities or OKRs** (needed to rate strategic alignment) - **Reach estimates** (users affected per quarter — even rough estimates work) - **Effort estimates** (person-months — from engineering if available) - **Quarter or planning period** ## Two-Stage Process ### Stage 1: RICE Scoring - Reach: Users affected per quarter - Impact: 3/2/1/0.5/0.25 scale - Confidence: 100% / 80% / 50% - Effort: Person-months - RICE = (R × I × C) / E ### Stage 2: Strategic Alignment Score Rate each initiative against your current strategic priorities (provided as input): - Directly supports top OKR: +3 - Supports secondary OKR: +2 - Neutral: +1 - Contradicts strategic direction: -1 ### Final Priority Score Combined Score = RICE Score + (Strategic Alignment × 10) **Validate** — Flag any initiative where RICE score and strategic alignment conflict sharply (e.g., high RICE, low alignment). These require an explicit team conversation before sequencing. ## Output Structure ### Priority Matrix — [Quarter] | Initiative | RICE Score | Strategic Alignment | Combined Score | Quadrant | Recommendation | |------------|------------|--------------------|--------------------|----------|----------------| | [name] | [score] | [score] | [combined] | [Now/Next/Later/Drop] | [action] | #### Quadrant Definitions - **Now:** High RICE + High Strategic Alignment → Build this quarter - **Next:** High RICE + Lower Alignment → Queue for next quarter - **Later:** Lower RICE + High Alignment → Revisit when capacity allows - **Drop:** Low RICE + Low Alignment → Remove from backlog #### Recommendations [Top 5 initiatives with rationale for sequencing] ## Quality Checks - [ ] All RICE components have an estimate (even if low confidence — flag those) - [ ] Strategic alignment is rated against specific OKRs, not general "feels strategic" - [ ] Conflicts between RICE rank and strategic alignment are explicitly flagged - [ ] "Drop" recommendations are specific — not just "low priority, deprioritise" - [ ] Confidence levels on estimates are noted where weak (drives the 50% confidence flag)
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- 360-feedback-templateDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
- ab-test-plannerDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
- accessibility-auditGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
- account-planBuild a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.
- aeo-optimizerOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — restructuring content so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Rewrites headings as questions, drops 50-80 word answer capsules, audits paragraph length, and flags trust signals. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines.
- ai-ethics-reviewConduct an ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when asked to run an AI ethics review, assess AI risks, audit a model for bias, or produce an AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with prioritised mitigations.
- ai-product-canvasStructure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.
- ambiguity-resolverStructure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan.
- api-docs-writerWrite clear, developer-facing API documentation. Use when asked to document an API endpoint, write API reference docs, create a developer guide, or turn a raw spec/Postman collection into documentation. Produces endpoint documentation with descriptions, parameters, request/response examples, and error codes.
- api-versioning-strategyWrite an API versioning strategy document for a service or API platform. Use when asked to define versioning policy, plan API deprecation, classify breaking changes, or document version lifecycle. Produces a complete versioning strategy with breaking-change classification table, deprecation timeline, migration guide template, and client communication template.