nda-analyser
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/nda-analyserNDAs are often treated as routine paperwork but contain terms with significant long-term consequences. This skill analyses them systematically.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/nda-analyserView on GitHub ↗
--- name: nda-analyser description: "Analyse a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and flag key terms, unusual provisions, and negotiation points. Use when asked to review an NDA, mutual NDA, confidentiality agreement, or non-disclosure deed. Produces clause-by-clause analysis with risk flags and a negotiation checklist." --- # NDA Analyser Skill NDAs are often treated as routine paperwork but contain terms with significant long-term consequences. This skill analyses them systematically. ## Required Inputs - **NDA text** (paste in full or describe key clauses) - **Your party position** (disclosing / receiving / mutual) - **Purpose of the NDA** (e.g. pre-sales, hiring, M&A, partnership) - **Industry context** (optional) ## Output Structure ### 1. NDA Type and Parties - **Type:** Unilateral / Mutual - **Disclosing party:** [Name] - **Receiving party:** [Name] - **Purpose:** [As stated] - **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction] - **Term:** [Duration of obligations] ### 2. Definition of Confidential Information - **How broadly defined?** Narrow / Standard / Very broad - **Oral disclosures included?** Yes / No / With conditions - **Standard exclusions present?** [public domain, prior knowledge, independently developed, legally required disclosure] - **Flag:** [Unusual inclusions or missing exclusions] ### 3. Key Clause Analysis **[Clause name] — Concern / Watch / Standard** - **What it says:** [Plain English] - **Issue:** [Why flagged] - **Standard position:** [What this typically looks like] - **Negotiation suggestion:** [If applicable] Clauses always covered: permitted use, non-solicitation/non-compete, term and post-termination obligations, return/destruction of information, remedies, liability, residuals clause. ### 4. Negotiation Checklist | Point | Current position | Suggested ask | |---|---|---| | [e.g. Confidentiality term] | [e.g. 5 years] | [e.g. Reduce to 2 years] | ### 5. Plain English Verdict 2-3 sentences. Standard NDA, one-sided, or needs a lawyer? --- WARNING: This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified solicitor before signing. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Definition of confidential information assessed for scope (narrow / standard / very broad) - [ ] Residuals clause checked (allows memory use of disclosed information — high-risk) - [ ] Non-solicitation / non-compete provisions flagged - [ ] Post-termination obligations duration noted - [ ] Plain English verdict given (standard / one-sided / needs lawyer) - [ ] Disclaimer is included ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Analyse this NDA" - "Review this confidentiality agreement" - "Is this NDA standard or unusual?" - "What should I negotiate in this mutual NDA?"