change-management-plan
$
npx mdskill add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/change-management-planProduces a structured change management plan — because most change initiatives fail not because the change is wrong, but because people aren't brought along with it.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/change-management-planView on GitHub ↗
--- name: change-management-plan description: "Create a structured change management plan for any organisational change. Use when asked to write a change management plan, manage a change initiative, plan a system rollout, or lead an organisational transformation. Produces a plan covering stakeholder analysis, impact assessment, communication strategy, and resistance management." --- # Change Management Plan Skill Produces a structured change management plan — because most change initiatives fail not because the change is wrong, but because people aren't brought along with it. ## Required Inputs Ask the user for these if not provided: - **The change** (what is changing, and what is the current state?) - **Scale** (how many people affected, in how many teams/locations?) - **Timeline** (when does the change go live? How long is the transition?) - **Sponsor** (who is accountable at senior level?) - **Key concern** (what is the biggest risk to adoption?) - **What happens if change fails** (consequences of low adoption) ## Output Structure --- # Change Management Plan: [Change Name] **Change sponsor:** [Executive owner] **Change manager:** [Who is running this] **Go-live date:** [Date] **Affected population:** [N people, N teams/locations] --- ## 1. Change Summary **From (current state):** [Specific description of today's situation] **To (future state):** [Specific description of what changes] **Why this change is happening:** [Honest explanation — people adopt change faster when they understand the real reason] **What stays the same:** [Explicitly naming what is NOT changing reduces anxiety] --- ## 2. Stakeholder Analysis | Stakeholder group | Size | Impact level | Current sentiment | What they need | |---|---|---|---|---| | [Group] | [N] | High/Med/Low | Supportive / Neutral / Resistant | [Specific concern or need] | **Key influencers to engage early:** [Name the informal leaders, respected voices, and early adopters who can help. And the resistors who need direct attention.] --- ## 3. Impact Assessment | Area | Impact | Severity | Action needed | |---|---|---|---| | Daily workflow | [What changes day-to-day] | High/Med/Low | [Training / support / redesign] | | Systems or tools | [What tools are affected] | | | | Roles and responsibilities | [Any role changes] | | | | Processes | [Process changes] | | | | Metrics and targets | [Any KPI changes] | | | --- ## 4. Communication Plan **Core message:** [The 1-sentence summary everyone should understand and remember] | Audience | Message focus | Channel | Timing | Owner | |---|---|---|---|---| | All staff | [Why this is happening + what to expect] | All-hands / Email | [T-6 weeks] | Sponsor | | Managers | [How to support their teams] | Manager briefing | [T-5 weeks] | Change manager | | Directly affected teams | [What changes for them specifically] | Team meeting | [T-4 weeks] | Line manager | | [Other group] | [Tailored message] | | | | **Communication principles:** - Over-communicate — people need to hear a message 7 times to internalise it - Use managers to cascade, not just top-down announcements - Create a feedback channel — questions left unanswered become rumours --- ## 5. Training and Support Plan | Audience | Training type | Timing | Duration | Delivery | Owner | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [Group] | [e.g. Hands-on system training] | [T-2 weeks] | [2 hours] | [In-person / online] | [Owner] | **Go-live support:** - [What support is available on day 1 — helpdesk, floor walkers, champions] - [Escalation path for issues in first 30 days] --- ## 6. Resistance Management **Anticipated resistance sources:** | Concern | Who holds it | Root cause | Response | |---|---|---|---| | [e.g. "This will increase my workload"] | [Middle managers] | [Loss of autonomy] | [Specific action to address] | **Resistance management principles:** - Acknowledge concerns genuinely — dismissing resistance amplifies it - Involve resistors in design where possible — converts them into advocates - Distinguish between genuine concerns (worth addressing) and preference for the status quo (to be managed, not solved) --- ## 7. Adoption Metrics | Metric | Baseline | Target | Measurement point | Owner | |---|---|---|---|---| | [System usage rate] | [0%] | [80%] | [30 days post go-live] | [Owner] | | [Process compliance] | [X%] | [Y%] | [60 days] | [Owner] | | [Staff confidence score] | [Survey score] | [Target] | [90 days] | [Owner] | **Adoption milestones:** - D+7: [First check — early issues identified] - D+30: [First adoption review] - D+90: [Sustained adoption confirmed or remediation plan activated] --- ## Quality Checks - [ ] "What stays the same" is explicitly addressed - [ ] Stakeholder analysis includes resistors, not just supporters - [ ] Communication plan uses managers to cascade (not just top-down) - [ ] Training is timed before go-live (not after) - [ ] Adoption metrics have a measurement date and owner - [ ] Resistance management has specific responses (not just "communicate more") ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Write a change management plan for [initiative]" - "Help me plan the rollout of [system change] for [team/org]" - "Create a communication and training plan for [change]" - "How do I manage resistance to [change]?"
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- 360-feedback-templateDesign a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
- ab-test-plannerDesign statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
- accessibility-auditGenerate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
- account-planBuild a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.
- aeo-optimizerOptimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) — restructuring content so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Rewrites headings as questions, drops 50-80 word answer capsules, audits paragraph length, and flags trust signals. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines.
- ai-ethics-reviewConduct an ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when asked to run an AI ethics review, assess AI risks, audit a model for bias, or produce an AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with prioritised mitigations.
- ai-product-canvasStructure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.
- ambiguity-resolverStructure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan.
- api-docs-writerWrite clear, developer-facing API documentation. Use when asked to document an API endpoint, write API reference docs, create a developer guide, or turn a raw spec/Postman collection into documentation. Produces endpoint documentation with descriptions, parameters, request/response examples, and error codes.
- api-versioning-strategyWrite an API versioning strategy document for a service or API platform. Use when asked to define versioning policy, plan API deprecation, classify breaking changes, or document version lifecycle. Produces a complete versioning strategy with breaking-change classification table, deprecation timeline, migration guide template, and client communication template.