prd-v09-launch-channels-orb
$
npx mdskill add mattgierhart/PRD-driven-context-engineering/prd-v09-launch-channels-orbPosition in workflow: v0.9 Offer Construction (Hormozi) → **v0.9 Launch Channels (ORB)** → v0.9 Launch Metrics
SKILL.md
.github/skills/prd-v09-launch-channels-orbView on GitHub ↗
--- name: prd-v09-launch-channels-orb description: > Allocate launch channels using the Owned / Rented / Borrowed (ORB) framework during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to pick launch channels, distribute the offer, build a channel portfolio, or when user asks "where do we launch?", "what channels?", "ORB", "owned vs rented vs borrowed", "channel allocation", "channel mix", "Corey Haines launch". Outputs GTM-* entries with Type=Channel, a channel-mix matrix, and a launch sequence. context: fork allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - WebSearch - WebFetch execution_modes: default: standard supports: [quick, standard, deep] --- # Launch Channels (ORB: Owned / Rented / Borrowed) Position in workflow: v0.9 Offer Construction (Hormozi) → **v0.9 Launch Channels (ORB)** → v0.9 Launch Metrics ## Execution Mode Default is **standard**. See [`.claude/rules/08-skill-execution-modes.md`](../../rules/08-skill-execution-modes.md) for selection logic. | Mode | What this skill produces | |------|--------------------------| | **quick** | 1 channel per layer (3 channels total); single-week sequence | | **standard** | 2–3 channels per layer; pre-launch / launch / post-launch sequence; attribution plan per channel | | **deep** | Full portfolio; per-channel content strategy; budget allocation; per-channel ROI projection; channel-mix risk register | ## Framework: Owned / Rented / Borrowed (ORB) ORB classifies every distribution channel by **who controls the audience**. The rule: **own the relationship, rent the platform, borrow the reach** — and balance the portfolio so no single channel can take you out. | Layer | Definition | Examples | Cost | Compounding | |-------|------------|----------|------|-------------| | **Owned** | You control the audience and the channel | Email list, website, product itself, blog you host, customer base | Time + tools | High — every additional list member compounds future launches | | **Rented** | You build presence on someone else's platform | Twitter/X, LinkedIn, YouTube, Slack/Discord communities, podcasts you host | Time | Medium — platform changes rules; audience is portable but messy | | **Borrowed** | You access someone else's audience temporarily | Press, podcast guesting, influencers, paid acquisition, integrations, partnerships, affiliate | Money or favor | Low — one-time reach unless converted to Owned/Rented | ### The Channel Allocation Principles 1. **Build Owned before launch, rent through launch, borrow at launch.** Without an owned audience, the launch is a one-shot dependent on borrowed reach. 2. **Pick channels your best-fit segment already uses.** Pulled from the Positioning best-fit characteristics — not from "what's popular this quarter." 3. **One channel per layer to start.** Too many channels at once = no signal which is working. Add channels by tier 2–3 only once tier-1 attribution is clean. 4. **Convert Borrowed → Owned aggressively.** Every press hit, podcast guest spot, or partnership should funnel to an owned channel (email signup, demo request) — otherwise it's vanity reach. 5. **Borrowed scales reach; Owned scales repeat.** A launch is a moment; the goal is a list. ## Consumes - **GTM-\* positioning statement** (from v0.9 Positioning) — Best-fit characteristics define where this segment actually spends time - **GTM-\* offer card** (from v0.9 Offer Construction) — The unit being distributed; channels must accommodate the offer's complexity - **PER-\* personas** (sharpened by Positioning) — Channel behavior data - **BR-\* product type** (from v0.2) — Clone/Innovation/Slice/Wrapper channel mixes differ: Clone leans Borrowed-paid, Innovation leans Owned-content, Slice leans Rented-community - **KPI-\* baseline targets** (from v0.3 Outcome Definition) — Per-channel attribution targets must roll up to baseline KPIs - **DEP-\* release readiness** (from v0.8) — Channels only fire after DEP- criteria met ## Produces - **GTM-\* with Type=Channel** (one per channel) — Channel name, layer (O/R/B), best-fit fit rationale, content plan, attribution plan, owner, timeline phase - **GTM-\* channel-mix matrix** (one entry) — Portfolio summary: which channels in which phase, with budget/effort allocation - **GTM-\* with Type=Sequence** — Pre-launch / launch / post-launch channel firing order ## Execution ### Step 1: Map the best-fit segment's channels From the Positioning best-fit characteristics, list **where this segment is right now**. Be specific: - Owned channels they already subscribe to (newsletters, podcasts) - Rented platforms they actively use (with handles / community names) - Borrowed sources they trust (publications, influencers, conferences) Do not guess. If you don't know, that's a CFD- research gap. ### Step 2: Audit your existing assets What do you already have in each ORB layer? | Layer | Asset | Reach (est.) | Activation | Notes | |-------|-------|--------------|------------|-------| | Owned | Email list | | | | | Owned | Existing customers | | | | | Rented | Founder Twitter | | | | | Rented | Company LinkedIn | | | | | Borrowed | Press relationships | | | | | Borrowed | Partner integrations | | | | This audit reveals leverage — most launches over-rely on Borrowed because they have no Owned to lean on. Honest audit prevents that. ### Step 3: Pick channels per layer [standard+] | Mode | Owned | Rented | Borrowed | |------|-------|--------|----------| | quick | 1 | 1 | 1 | | standard | 2–3 | 2–3 | 2–3 | | deep | Full portfolio | Full portfolio | Full portfolio | For each candidate channel, score: - **Fit**: Does best-fit segment actually use this? (1–5) - **Reach**: How many of them does this channel touch? (Est.) - **Effort**: What's the time cost per launch wave? (Hours) - **Cost**: Direct $ cost? - **Attribution**: Can we measure conversion from this channel? Drop any candidate below **Fit 3/5** — no channel is worth it if best-fit doesn't show up there. ### Step 4: Sequence the launch Three phases: | Phase | Timeline | Channels active | Purpose | |-------|----------|-----------------|---------| | **Pre-launch** | T-30 to T-1 | Owned + Rented (warm) | Build anticipation, grow list | | **Launch** | T-0 to T+7 | All three (Borrowed peaks here) | Maximum reach | | **Post-launch** | T+7 to T+30 | Owned + Rented (sustain) | Convert reach to relationship | Quick mode collapses this to a single week. Deep mode extends to 90 days with explicit content per phase. ### Step 5: Plan per-channel attribution Every channel gets an attribution plan that ties to KPI-: | Channel | UTM / tracking | KPI- attribution target | Conversion event | |---------|----------------|-------------------------|------------------| | Owned: Email | utm_source=email | KPI-XX signup | clicked email → reached offer page | | Rented: Twitter | utm_source=twitter | KPI-XX signup | clicked tweet → reached offer page | | Borrowed: PH | utm_source=producthunt | KPI-XX signup | PH referrer → reached offer page | If a channel can't be attributed, demote it to "supporting" status (still useful for context, but don't count it). ### Step 6: Convert Borrowed → Owned [standard+] For every Borrowed channel, define the **next step that converts to Owned**. Examples: - Press hit → article includes "join our list for [bonus]" - Podcast guest → custom URL with email opt-in - Product Hunt launch → "early-access list" signup as primary CTA, not "buy now" If a Borrowed channel has no conversion-to-Owned plan, the launch is leaking value. ### Step 7: Build the channel-mix matrix A single GTM-* entry summarizing the portfolio. See output template below. ## Output Template ``` GTM-XXX: Channel — [Channel Name] Type: Channel Layer: [Owned | Rented | Borrowed] Owner: [Person / team] Status: [Planned | Active | Live] Channel: [Specific platform or property] Best-fit fit: [Why this channel reaches PER-XXX — anchored in Positioning best-fit characteristics] Fit score: X/5 Reach estimate: [#] Effort per wave: [Hours] Cost: [$] Attribution: [Tracking method, e.g., utm_source=...] Content plan: Pre-launch: [What goes out, when, what messaging] Launch: [...] Post-launch: [...] Conversion-to-Owned [if Borrowed]: [How this channel funnels to email list / signup] Linked IDs: PER-XXX (segment), GTM-YYY (positioning), GTM-ZZZ (offer), KPI-AAA (attribution target) ``` ``` GTM-XXX: Channel-Mix Matrix Type: Sequence Status: Approved Pre-launch (T-30 to T-1): Owned: GTM-AAA (email), GTM-BBB (blog) Rented: GTM-CCC (Twitter) Borrowed: — (none active yet) Launch (T-0 to T+7): Owned: GTM-AAA, GTM-BBB Rented: GTM-CCC, GTM-DDD (LinkedIn) Borrowed: GTM-EEE (Product Hunt), GTM-FFF (Press) Post-launch (T+7 to T+30): Owned: GTM-AAA (drip sequence) Rented: GTM-CCC (results / social proof posts) Borrowed: GTM-FFF (case study placements) Total budget: $X (Borrowed: $X; Rented tools: $Y; Owned: $Z) Total effort: X hours/week pre-launch; Y hours during launch week Linked IDs: GTM-YYY (positioning), GTM-ZZZ (offer), DEP-AAA (release readiness), KPI-BBB (attribution rollup) ``` ## Anti-Patterns | Pattern | Signal | Fix | |---------|--------|-----| | **Borrowed-only launch** | "We'll launch on Product Hunt and Twitter" with no email list | Build Owned for 30+ days pre-launch or accept the one-shot risk | | **All channels at once** | 8 channels in launch week, no idea which worked | Cut to 1 per layer until attribution is clean | | **Channels not used by best-fit** | "We should be on TikTok" when segment is on LinkedIn | Drop the channel; segment fit > channel popularity | | **No conversion path** | Press hit drives traffic to a homepage with no CTA | Every Borrowed channel needs an email-capture CTA | | **Sequence flattening** | All channels fire on launch day | Pre-launch matters — borrow only after Owned and Rented are warm | | **Vanity reach** | "We got 50k impressions" but no signups | Drop the channel or fix attribution | ## Quality Gates Before proceeding to Launch Metrics: - [ ] At least one channel per layer (Owned + Rented + Borrowed), each with Fit ≥ 3/5 - [ ] Every channel traces to best-fit characteristics from Positioning - [ ] Every channel has an attribution plan (UTM or equivalent) - [ ] Every Borrowed channel has a defined conversion-to-Owned path - [ ] Sequence covers pre-launch, launch, post-launch phases (standard+) - [ ] Channel-mix matrix GTM-* entry exists and references all channel GTM-* entries ## Downstream Connections | Consumer | What it uses | Example | |----------|--------------|---------| | **Launch Metrics** | Per-channel attribution targets become KPI- entries | Per-channel UTM → KPI-channel-signups | | **Feedback Loop Setup** | Active channels become feedback sources | Twitter mentions → CFD- entries | | **v0.9 Tactical playbooks** | AEO audit, alternatives pages, cold outreach, HN/Reddit launch all attach to specific channels named here | Channel = AEO target | | **v1.0 Crossing the Chasm (Moore)** | Channel mix shifts per adoption stage | Early-adopter channels ≠ early-majority channels | ## Detailed References - Corey Haines, *Marketing Skills* repo — `launch` skill (ORB classification) - Joe Pulizzi, *Content Inc.* (Owned-first compounding) - (No bundled `references/` — read source skills for depth)
More from mattgierhart/PRD-driven-context-engineering
- ghm-gate-check>
- ghm-harvest>
- ghm-id-register>
- ghm-sot-builder>
- ghm-status-sync>
- ghm-template-sync>
- prd-v01-problem-framing>
- prd-v01-user-value-articulation>
- prd-v02-competitive-landscape-mapping>
- prd-v02-product-type-classificationClassify product approach into one of six types (Clone, Unbundle, Undercut, Slice, Wrapper, Innovation) based on competitive landscape. Triggers on PRD v0.2 work after competitive analysis, or when user asks "what type of product should we build?", "should we clone or innovate?", "is this a fast-follow opportunity?", "how should we position against competitors?", "clone vs undercut", "unbundle vs slice", or requests help choosing product strategy. Outputs BR- entries for product type classification and inherited GTM constraints.