pr-to-main

$npx mdskill add breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio/pr-to-main

Create a PR to main for feature/fix changes in cc-wf-studio monorepo

  • Identify and gather context about changes made on the branch.
  • Use pnpm and Changesets tools to determine affected packages and ensure a changeset exists.
  • Decide which package(s) changed and create a PR targeting main with appropriate scope.
  • Automatically open and submit the PR for review by the release pipeline.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/pr-to-mainView on GitHub ↗
---
name: pr-to-main
description: Create a PR to the main branch for feature/fix changes in this pnpm + Changesets monorepo. Use when the user says "PRを作成", "mainにPR", or wants to submit changes for review. Always run this in the monorepo-aware way — identify the affected package(s) and make sure a changeset exists, because the release pipeline is Changesets-driven.
---

# PR to Main Branch

Create a PR for a feature/fix branch targeting `main` in the cc-wf-studio monorepo.

This is a **pnpm monorepo with four packages** (`packages/core`, `packages/mcp`, `packages/cli`, `packages/vscode`) and versioning is driven by **Changesets**, not commit messages. Two monorepo facts shape this workflow:

- A release-worthy change must ship with a `.changeset/*.md` file in the same PR. Without it, the change merges but **never gets released** — and pending changesets later block promotion to production.
- Knowing *which package(s)* changed drives the changeset target, the PR scope, and the commit scope (e.g. `fix(vscode):`).

So the job here is not just "open a PR" — it's "open a PR that the release pipeline can actually act on."

## Workflow

1. **Gather context** (run in parallel):
   - `git status` (no `-uall`)
   - `git diff` (staged + unstaged) and `git diff origin/main...HEAD` for the full branch delta
   - `git log origin/main..HEAD --oneline` for every commit on the branch
   - Check whether the branch tracks a remote and needs pushing
   - `ls .changeset/*.md` to see whether a changeset already exists

2. **Identify scope and type**:
   - **Affected package(s)**: map changed paths to packages — `packages/core` → `@cc-wf-studio/core`, `packages/mcp` → `@cc-wf-studio/mcp`, `packages/cli` → `@cc-wf-studio/cli`, `packages/vscode` → `cc-wf-studio` (the VSCode extension). Changes outside `packages/` (root config, `.github/`, docs) usually need no release.
   - **Type**: read the commit prefix, allowing an optional scope — `fix:` / `fix(vscode):` → fix, `feat:` / `feat(core):` → feat, `improvement:` → improvement. Review **all** commits on the branch, not just the latest.

3. **Ensure a changeset exists** (the monorepo-critical step):
   - If a `.changeset/*.md` already covers this change, confirm it names the right package(s) and bump level, and move on.
   - If the change should be released and no changeset exists, create one with `pnpm changeset` — select the affected package(s) from step 2, choose patch/minor/major, and write a one-line summary (this becomes the CHANGELOG entry). Note: bumping `@cc-wf-studio/core` auto-bumps its dependents, so you don't author separate changesets for `cli`/`mcp`.
   - If the change genuinely needs no release (CI-only, tooling, docs), record that intent explicitly with `pnpm changeset add --empty` so the pipeline isn't left guessing.
   - Why this matters: releases are cut later by manually opening the Release PR (which consumes the accumulated changesets) and merging it — that merge auto-publishes. A PR that lands without the right changeset silently never gets released. (See `docs/release-flow.md` for the release side — releasing is a human-only action, not something to self-trigger.)

4. **Verify the build is green** before opening the PR:
   - Run `pnpm check && pnpm build` from the repo root (Biome + type-checks, then full compilation). Reviewers and CI expect a clean tree, and catching breakage now is cheaper than after review.

5. **Select the PR template** based on type (from step 2):
   - `fix:` → `assets/fix-template.md`
   - `feat:` → `assets/feat-template.md`
   - `improvement:` → `assets/improvement-template.md`

6. **Create the PR**:
   - Push the branch with `git push -u` if it has no upstream.
   - Open it with `gh pr create --base main`, filling the chosen template.

## PR Format

- **Language**: always write the PR title and body in English (repo rule).
- **Title** — `main` merges via **squash**, so the PR title *becomes* the squash commit subject. It must therefore follow the commit convention: `<type>(<scope>): <description>`.
  - `<type>`: matches the change type from step 2 — `fix` / `feat` / `improvement` / `docs` / `refactor` / `chore` / `ci`.
  - `<scope>`: the affected package/area from step 2 — `vscode`, `cli`, `mcp`, `core` (use the directory name, not the npm name). List several as `(cli, mcp)`. **Omit the scope** for repo-wide changes (root config, `.github/`, top-level docs), e.g. `ci: guard against pending changesets`.
  - `<description>`: imperative mood, no trailing period, concise (aim ≤50 chars per the commit guideline; GitHub appends a `(#NN)` suffix, with a leading space, on squash — so don't pad it).
  - Examples (from this repo's history): `fix(vscode): parse Changesets-format CHANGELOG`, `feat(cli): ccwf install-skills subcommand`, `docs: add root README for the monorepo`.
- **Body**: in the **Changes** section, write real monorepo paths (`packages/vscode/src/...`, `packages/core/...`), not generic placeholders.
- Mention the changeset in the body so reviewers can see the intended release effect — e.g. "Adds a `patch` changeset for `cc-wf-studio`" or "No release needed (empty changeset)".

## Templates

- **fix:** `assets/fix-template.md` — Problem/Solution with Current vs Expected behavior.
- **feat:** `assets/feat-template.md` — Summary/Motivation/Changes.
- **improvement:** `assets/improvement-template.md` — Before/After comparison.

More from breaking-brake/cc-wf-studio

SkillDescription
cc-workflow-ai-editorAI workflow editor for CC Workflow Studio. Create and edit visual AI agent workflows through interactive conversation using MCP tools (get_workflow_schema, get_current_workflow, apply_workflow, update_nodes). Use when the user wants to create a new workflow, modify an existing workflow, or edit the workflow canvas in CC Workflow Studio via the built-in MCP server.
ccwf-cliUse the `ccwf` CLI (from @cc-wf-studio/cli) to render, validate, preview, export, or run cc-wf-studio workflow JSON files from the terminal. Apply whenever the user mentions viewing, visualizing, checking, executing, or converting a workflow under `.vscode/workflows/` (or any `*workflow*.json`), wants a Mermaid diagram of a workflow, asks to "see" / "preview" / "open" a workflow, or wants to run a workflow as a Claude Code Skill without opening VSCode.
jira-driven-planningJiraチケットの要件とConfluenceの関連ドキュメントを基に、Frontend/Backend/Infrastructureに分割した実装計画を策定するプランニングスキル。Jiraチケット情報とConfluence検索結果が前段で取得済みであることを前提とし、構造化された実装計画を出力する。「プランニング」「実装計画策定」「タスク分割」などの文脈で使用。
next-taskRun one unattended iteration of the autonomous value-creation loop — invent an improvement that users of cc-wf-studio would notice, judge it against an explicit value bar, implement it on a branch off auto-dev, open a PR that squash-merges on green CI, and log the outcome. Use when the user says "次のタスク", "next task", "何か進めて", "続きをやって", or wants autonomous progress without specifying what to do.
pr-review-analysisAnalyze PR review comments from a GitHub PR URL. Fetch review comments, verify each finding against the actual codebase, assess validity (correct/incorrect/partial), present a structured summary with recommended actions, and optionally reply to each comment on GitHub. Use when given a PR review URL or when asked to check/analyze PR feedback.
pr-to-main-cleanupClean up merged feature branches after PR to main is merged. Use when the user says "ブランチ削除", "cleanup", "マージ後の片付け", or wants to delete a merged branch.
workflow-schema-tuningUse when modifying `resources/workflow-schema.json` in cc-wf-studio to influence how AI agents generate workflows via the cc-workflow-ai-editor skill. Triggers include "AIが特定のノードタイプを選んでくれない", "ワークフロー生成のバイアスを調整したい", "スキーマの description を変えたい", "新しいノードタイプを追加したい", "嘘の制約がスキーマに混じっていないか確認したい". Covers what the schema actually does (instructions to AI, not runtime constraints), the design philosophy (align direction, do not prescribe rules), the build pipeline (.json → .toon auto-generated), and known bias sources to audit.