docs-seeker

$npx mdskill add avibebuilder/claude-prime/docs-seeker

Fetch up-to-date documentation for any library or API into context.

  • Solves stale knowledge by retrieving current docs instead of guessing.
  • Depends on official docs sites and llms.txt files for AI-optimized content.
  • Prefers sources by signal per token, starting with llms.txt.
  • Delivers token-dense, current documentation directly to the agent context.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/docs-seekerView on GitHub ↗
---
name: docs-seeker
description: "Fetch up-to-date documentation for any library, framework, API, or service into context. Use when the user wants to look up API references, check function signatures or required fields, find feature-specific docs, or verify how an external tool actually works. Triggers for queries about third-party libraries like Stripe, SQLAlchemy, Tailwind, FastAPI, shadcn, Drizzle, Hono, Better Auth — any time the answer lives in official docs rather than in the project codebase. Use this instead of guessing from trained knowledge, which is stale."
---

## Why fetch instead of recall

Trained knowledge rots. Library APIs rename fields, deprecate hooks, restructure auth flows, and change defaults between minor versions. Answering from memory is how you get confidently wrong code. Replace memory with retrieval — cheaply, from sources designed for AI consumption.

## The source hierarchy (and why)

Prefer sources in this order. The ranking is about *signal per token*, not just availability.

1. **`llms.txt` on the official docs site** — hand-curated by the project, AI-optimized, token-dense, always current. This is the ideal source when it exists. Try `{official-docs-url}/llms.txt` first for any library with a docs site; many projects ship one even if they don't advertise it. If `llms.txt` is just an index of links, follow the most relevant ones. `llms-full.txt` exists on some sites and contains the full corpus — only reach for it when the user explicitly wants comprehensive docs, since it's large.

2. **Context7** — a mirror that ingests GitHub repos and exposes them at `https://context7.com/{org}/{repo}/llms.txt`, with optional `?topic={keyword}` filtering. Use this when the project has no official `llms.txt`, or when you want to scope to one feature. The `{org}/{repo}` path mirrors GitHub exactly — derive it from the user's `package.json`, imports, lockfile, or the project's GitHub URL rather than guessing. For docs sites without a clear repo, Context7 also hosts `https://context7.com/websites/{normalized-path}/llms.txt`.

3. **GitMCP** — any GitHub repo is accessible by swapping `github.com` → `gitmcp.io` in the URL. Useful when Context7 doesn't have the repo indexed, or when you need source-of-truth README/examples straight from the repo.

4. **WebSearch** — last resort. Slower, noisier, and you'll spend tokens filtering results. Only fall here when the three structured sources all miss. When you do search, query for `"{library} llms.txt"` first — it often surfaces an official or community-maintained one.

On any 404, timeout, or empty response: move to the next tier immediately. Never retry a failed source.

## Topic scoping

When the user's query targets a specific feature (e.g., "shadcn date picker", "Next.js middleware", "Stripe webhooks"), append `?topic={keyword}` to the Context7 URL to narrow the fetch. Pick a short root keyword that captures the feature — judgment call, no rigid rules. The goal is fewer tokens, higher relevance. If the topic URL returns nothing useful, drop the topic and try the general URL.

## Reading the docs you find

Once you have URLs, the question is how to read them without polluting the main context.

- **A handful of small pages, or content the orchestrator clearly needs verbatim**: read directly with `WebFetch`. Fast, simple, no overhead.
- **Many pages, or large pages where you only need specific answers**: fan out to parallel subagents, each reading a subset and returning a condensed summary. This protects the main context window from doc bloat and parallelizes I/O. Use judgment on fan-out count — a couple for moderate sets, more for large ones. The tradeoff is latency/tokens vs. main-context pollution; lean toward subagents whenever the raw docs would be noisy relative to what the orchestrator actually needs.

When delegating to subagents, tell them exactly what question to answer and what to return (e.g., "return the exact signature and required fields for `stripe.webhooks.constructEvent`, plus any version notes") — not "summarize these docs". Specific asks give specific answers.

## Version awareness

Before fetching, check what version the project actually uses — `package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `go.mod`, lockfiles. Fetching the latest docs when the project is pinned two majors behind is a common way to hand back wrong answers. If a version-specific doc path exists (e.g., `/v2/llms.txt`, `/docs/4.x/`), prefer it.

## Gotchas

- **Don't fabricate.** If every source misses, say so clearly and ask the user for a URL or a different approach. A made-up API signature is worse than "I couldn't find it."
- **Don't over-fetch.** The orchestrator asked a question; pull what answers it, not the entire manual. Every token you add competes for attention downstream.
- **Don't trust your own cache.** If you recall that a library's docs live at a certain URL, verify — sites reorganize. A fresh fetch beats a confident memory.
- **Report what you used.** When you hand results back, note which source succeeded (llms.txt / Context7 / GitMCP / WebSearch) and the URLs fetched. This lets the orchestrator judge freshness and lets the user follow up.

## Constraints

- Use `WebFetch` to read URLs. Do not invoke MCP servers for this.
- Prefer `llms.txt` over `llms-full.txt` unless comprehensive docs are explicitly requested.
- Never retry a failed source — move down the tier list.

More from avibebuilder/claude-prime

SkillDescription
askAnswer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.
backend-fastapi-pythonUse this skill for any Python backend work in this project: building FastAPI endpoints, writing service functions, defining Pydantic/SQLModel schemas, running Alembic migrations, or debugging 422 errors. Essential for authentication and authorization patterns — setting up get_current_user, is_superuser checks, admin-only guards, role-based access, and dependency injection chains like Depends(). Also covers middleware, background tasks, async SQLAlchemy sessions, ORM relationship loading, and request/response design. Activate whenever the question involves Python API code, FastAPI patterns, or backend architecture in this codebase. Not for frontend, Docker, CI/CD, or infrastructure.
create-docUse when the user wants to save knowledge as a file so others don't have to rediscover it — \"turn this into a doc\", \"write this up\", \"document how X works\", \"we figured this out and want to capture it\", \"nobody should have to figure this out again\". Covers any request to create or update durable written artifacts: onboarding guides, runbooks, ADRs, API docs, architecture notes, postmortems, changelogs, setup guides. The trigger: user wants knowledge captured in a file for future reference, not just a conversation. Do NOT use when still making decisions (→ give-plan), just asking for explanation without a file (→ ask), or writing code (→ cook).
discussBrainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.
frontend-developmentUse this skill for ANY work involving React, Next.js, TypeScript, or Tailwind in the browser layer. This includes building components and pages, but equally covers debugging and fixing frontend issues: CSS/Tailwind classes not applying, form validation behavior, hydration mismatches between server and client renders, styling bugs, layout shifts, and rendering problems. Also use for refactoring components (e.g., splitting Server vs Client Components), data fetching patterns, state management, bundle optimization, and frontend tooling. If the problem involves what users see or interact with in a web browser — whether building, fixing, or refactoring — use this skill. Not for backend APIs, databases, infrastructure, or DevOps.
give-planUse when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.
media-processorSpecialized visual and multimedia processing tools. Use this skill whenever a task involves complex visual content — UI mockups, dense screenshots, design images, charts, artwork — where precise details like spacing, hex colors, font sizes, and component hierarchy need to be extracted accurately. Also use for: reviewing or auditing existing UI against designs, comparing screenshots for visual regressions, transcribing audio/video, extracting data from PDFs with complex layouts, and generating images. Trigger whenever the user wants to implement from a design, review or compare UI screenshots, analyze visual details precisely, describe artwork or aesthetic content, or process any media file (audio, video, PDF).
optimus-primeGenerates a Claude Code configuration tailored to a specific project. Use whenever the user wants to prime a project, set up claude for a repo, bootstrap claude config, or re-prime/refresh an already-primed project (for example after `/prime-sync` pulled new starter content). Triggers on 'prime', 'prime this project', 'optimus-prime', 're-prime', 'refresh claude config', 'regenerate CLAUDE.md', 'set up claude for this repo'. Deeply analyzes the real codebase and builds project-specific skills, rules, and CLAUDE.md — not generic boilerplate. For ongoing config health checks and proposal review, use `self-evolve` instead.
prime-syncSyncs Claude config between prime repo and target projects. Trigger on 'sync', 'prime-sync', 'push config', 'pull config', 'update prime', 'sync claude config'. Push mode deploys to targets; pull mode imports changes back.
self-evolve>