secrets-vault-manager
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/secrets-vault-managerManages secret infrastructure and integrates secure secret storage solutions
- Sets up secret management systems for production environments
- Leverages HashiCorp Vault and cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP
- Analyzes compliance needs and secret usage patterns to recommend configurations
- Delivers secure, auditable secret management workflows and automation
SKILL.md
.github/skills/secrets-vault-managerView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "secrets-vault-manager"
description: "Use when the user asks to set up secret management infrastructure, integrate HashiCorp Vault, configure cloud secret stores (AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), implement secret rotation, or audit secret access patterns."
---
# Secrets Vault Manager
**Tier:** POWERFUL
**Category:** Engineering
**Domain:** Security / Infrastructure / DevOps
---
## Overview
Production secret infrastructure management for teams running HashiCorp Vault, cloud-native secret stores, or hybrid architectures. This skill covers policy authoring, auth method configuration, automated rotation, dynamic secrets, audit logging, and incident response.
**Distinct from env-secrets-manager** which handles local `.env` file hygiene and leak detection. This skill operates at the infrastructure layer — Vault clusters, cloud KMS, certificate authorities, and CI/CD secret injection.
### When to Use
- Standing up a new Vault cluster or migrating to a managed secret store
- Designing auth methods for services, CI runners, and human operators
- Implementing automated credential rotation (database, API keys, certificates)
- Auditing secret access patterns for compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA)
- Responding to a secret leak that requires mass revocation
- Integrating secrets into Kubernetes workloads or CI/CD pipelines
---
## HashiCorp Vault Patterns
### Architecture Decisions
| Decision | Recommendation | Rationale |
|----------|---------------|-----------|
| Deployment mode | HA with Raft storage | No external dependency, built-in leader election |
| Auto-unseal | Cloud KMS (AWS KMS / Azure Key Vault / GCP KMS) | Eliminates manual unseal, enables automated restarts |
| Namespaces | One per environment (dev/staging/prod) | Blast-radius isolation, independent policies |
| Audit devices | File + syslog (dual) | Vault refuses requests if all audit devices fail — dual prevents outages |
### Auth Methods
**AppRole** — Machine-to-machine authentication for services and batch jobs.
```hcl
# Enable AppRole
path "auth/approle/*" {
capabilities = ["create", "read", "update", "delete", "list"]
}
# Application-specific role
vault write auth/approle/role/payment-service \
token_ttl=1h \
token_max_ttl=4h \
secret_id_num_uses=1 \
secret_id_ttl=10m \
token_policies="payment-service-read"
```
**Kubernetes** — Pod-native authentication via service account tokens.
```hcl
vault write auth/kubernetes/role/api-server \
bound_service_account_names=api-server \
bound_service_account_namespaces=production \
policies=api-server-secrets \
ttl=1h
```
**OIDC** — Human operator access via SSO provider (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace).
```hcl
vault write auth/oidc/role/engineering \
bound_audiences="vault" \
allowed_redirect_uris="https://vault.example.com/ui/vault/auth/oidc/oidc/callback" \
user_claim="email" \
oidc_scopes="openid,profile,email" \
policies="engineering-read" \
ttl=8h
```
### Secret Engines
| Engine | Use Case | TTL Strategy |
|--------|----------|-------------|
| KV v2 | Static secrets (API keys, config) | Versioned, manual rotation |
| Database | Dynamic DB credentials | 1h default, 24h max |
| PKI | TLS certificates | 90d leaf certs, 5y intermediate CA |
| Transit | Encryption-as-a-service | Key rotation every 90d |
| SSH | Signed SSH certificates | 30m for interactive, 8h for automation |
### Policy Design
Follow least-privilege with path-based granularity:
```hcl
# payment-service-read policy
path "secret/data/production/payment/*" {
capabilities = ["read"]
}
path "database/creds/payment-readonly" {
capabilities = ["read"]
}
# Deny access to admin paths explicitly
path "sys/*" {
capabilities = ["deny"]
}
```
**Policy naming convention:** `{service}-{access-level}` (e.g., `payment-service-read`, `api-gateway-admin`).
---
## Cloud Secret Store Integration
### Comparison Matrix
| Feature | AWS Secrets Manager | Azure Key Vault | GCP Secret Manager |
|---------|--------------------|-----------------|--------------------|
| Rotation | Built-in Lambda | Custom logic via Functions | Cloud Functions |
| Versioning | Automatic | Manual or automatic | Automatic |
| Encryption | AWS KMS (default or CMK) | HSM-backed | Google-managed or CMEK |
| Access control | IAM policies + resource policy | RBAC + Access Policies | IAM bindings |
| Cross-region | Replication supported | Geo-redundant by default | Replication supported |
| Audit | CloudTrail | Azure Monitor + Diagnostic Logs | Cloud Audit Logs |
| Pricing model | Per-secret + per-API call | Per-operation + per-key | Per-secret version + per-access |
### When to Use Which
- **AWS Secrets Manager**: RDS/Aurora credential rotation out of the box. Best when fully on AWS.
- **Azure Key Vault**: Certificate management strength. Required for Azure AD integrated workloads.
- **GCP Secret Manager**: Simplest API surface. Best for GKE-native workloads with Workload Identity.
- **HashiCorp Vault**: Multi-cloud, dynamic secrets, PKI, transit encryption. Best for complex or hybrid environments.
### SDK Access Patterns
**Principle:** Always fetch secrets at startup or via sidecar — never bake into images or config files.
```python
# AWS Secrets Manager pattern
import boto3, json
def get_secret(secret_name, region="us-east-1"):
client = boto3.client("secretsmanager", region_name=region)
response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId=secret_name)
return json.loads(response["SecretString"])
```
```python
# GCP Secret Manager pattern
from google.cloud import secretmanager
def get_secret(project_id, secret_id, version="latest"):
client = secretmanager.SecretManagerServiceClient()
name = f"projects/{project_id}/secrets/{secret_id}/versions/{version}"
response = client.access_secret_version(request={"name": name})
return response.payload.data.decode("UTF-8")
```
```python
# Azure Key Vault pattern
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
from azure.keyvault.secrets import SecretClient
def get_secret(vault_url, secret_name):
credential = DefaultAzureCredential()
client = SecretClient(vault_url=vault_url, credential=credential)
return client.get_secret(secret_name).value
```
---
## Secret Rotation Workflows
### Rotation Strategy by Secret Type
| Secret Type | Rotation Frequency | Method | Downtime Risk |
|-------------|-------------------|--------|---------------|
| Database passwords | 30 days | Dual-account swap | Zero (A/B rotation) |
| API keys | 90 days | Generate new, deprecate old | Zero (overlap window) |
| TLS certificates | 60 days before expiry | ACME or Vault PKI | Zero (graceful reload) |
| SSH keys | 90 days | Vault-signed certificates | Zero (CA-based) |
| Service tokens | 24 hours | Dynamic generation | Zero (short-lived) |
| Encryption keys | 90 days | Key versioning (rewrap) | Zero (version coexistence) |
### Database Credential Rotation (Dual-Account)
1. Two database accounts exist: `app_user_a` and `app_user_b`
2. Application currently uses `app_user_a`
3. Rotation rotates `app_user_b` password, updates secret store
4. Application switches to `app_user_b` on next credential fetch
5. After grace period, `app_user_a` password is rotated
6. Cycle repeats
### API Key Rotation (Overlap Window)
1. Generate new API key with provider
2. Store new key in secret store as `current`, move old to `previous`
3. Deploy applications — they read `current`
4. After all instances restarted (or TTL expired), revoke `previous`
5. Monitoring confirms zero usage of old key before revocation
---
## Dynamic Secrets
Dynamic secrets are generated on-demand with automatic expiration. Prefer dynamic secrets over static credentials wherever possible.
### Database Dynamic Credentials (Vault)
```hcl
# Configure database engine
vault write database/config/postgres \
plugin_name=postgresql-database-plugin \
connection_url="postgresql://{{username}}:{{password}}@db.example.com:5432/app" \
allowed_roles="app-readonly,app-readwrite" \
username="vault_admin" \
password="<admin-password>"
# Create role with TTL
vault write database/roles/app-readonly \
db_name=postgres \
creation_statements="CREATE ROLE \"{{name}}\" WITH LOGIN PASSWORD '{{password}}' VALID UNTIL '{{expiration}}'; GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO \"{{name}}\";" \
default_ttl=1h \
max_ttl=24h
```
### Cloud IAM Dynamic Credentials
Vault can generate short-lived AWS IAM credentials, Azure service principal passwords, or GCP service account keys — eliminating long-lived cloud credentials entirely.
### SSH Certificate Authority
Replace SSH key distribution with a Vault-signed certificate model:
1. Vault acts as SSH CA
2. Users/machines request signed certificates with short TTL (30 min)
3. SSH servers trust the CA public key — no `authorized_keys` management
4. Certificates expire automatically — no revocation needed for normal operations
---
## Audit Logging
### What to Log
| Event | Priority | Retention |
|-------|----------|-----------|
| Secret read access | HIGH | 1 year minimum |
| Secret creation/update | HIGH | 1 year minimum |
| Auth method login | MEDIUM | 90 days |
| Policy changes | CRITICAL | 2 years (compliance) |
| Failed access attempts | CRITICAL | 1 year |
| Token creation/revocation | MEDIUM | 90 days |
| Seal/unseal operations | CRITICAL | Indefinite |
### Anomaly Detection Signals
- Secret accessed from new IP/CIDR range
- Access volume spike (>3x baseline for a path)
- Off-hours access for human auth methods
- Service accessing secrets outside its policy scope (denied requests)
- Multiple failed auth attempts from single source
- Token created with unusually long TTL
### Compliance Reporting
Generate periodic reports covering:
1. **Access inventory** — Which identities accessed which secrets, when
2. **Rotation compliance** — Secrets overdue for rotation
3. **Policy drift** — Policies modified since last review
4. **Orphaned secrets** — Secrets with no recent access (>90 days)
Use `audit_log_analyzer.py` to parse Vault or cloud audit logs for these signals.
---
## Emergency Procedures
### Secret Leak Response (Immediate)
**Time target: Contain within 15 minutes of detection.**
1. **Identify scope** — Which secret(s) leaked, where (repo, log, error message, third party)
2. **Revoke immediately** — Rotate the compromised credential at the source (provider API, Vault, cloud SM)
3. **Invalidate tokens** — Revoke all Vault tokens that accessed the leaked secret
4. **Audit blast radius** — Query audit logs for usage of the compromised secret in the exposure window
5. **Notify stakeholders** — Security team, affected service owners, compliance (if PII/regulated data)
6. **Post-mortem** — Document root cause, update controls to prevent recurrence
### Vault Seal Operations
**When to seal:** Active security incident affecting Vault infrastructure, suspected key compromise.
**Sealing** stops all Vault operations. Use only as last resort.
**Unseal procedure:**
1. Gather quorum of unseal key holders (Shamir threshold)
2. Or confirm auto-unseal KMS key is accessible
3. Unseal via `vault operator unseal` or restart with auto-unseal
4. Verify audit devices reconnected
5. Check active leases and token validity
See `references/emergency_procedures.md` for complete playbooks.
---
## CI/CD Integration
### Vault Agent Sidecar (Kubernetes)
Vault Agent runs alongside application pods, handles authentication and secret rendering:
```yaml
# Pod annotation for Vault Agent Injector
annotations:
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject: "true"
vault.hashicorp.com/role: "api-server"
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-secret-db: "database/creds/app-readonly"
vault.hashicorp.com/agent-inject-template-db: |
{{- with secret "database/creds/app-readonly" -}}
postgresql://{{ .Data.username }}:{{ .Data.password }}@db:5432/app
{{- end }}
```
### External Secrets Operator (Kubernetes)
For teams preferring declarative GitOps over agent sidecars:
```yaml
apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1
kind: ExternalSecret
metadata:
name: api-credentials
spec:
refreshInterval: 1h
secretStoreRef:
name: vault-backend
kind: ClusterSecretStore
target:
name: api-credentials
data:
- secretKey: api-key
remoteRef:
key: secret/data/production/api
property: key
```
### GitHub Actions OIDC
Eliminate long-lived secrets in CI by using OIDC federation:
```yaml
- name: Authenticate to Vault
uses: hashicorp/vault-action@v2
with:
url: https://vault.example.com
method: jwt
role: github-ci
jwtGithubAudience: https://vault.example.com
secrets: |
secret/data/ci/deploy api_key | DEPLOY_API_KEY ;
secret/data/ci/deploy db_password | DB_PASSWORD
```
---
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Risk | Correct Approach |
|-------------|------|-----------------|
| Hardcoded secrets in source code | Leak via repo, logs, error output | Fetch from secret store at runtime |
| Long-lived static tokens (>30 days) | Stale credentials, no accountability | Dynamic secrets or short TTL + rotation |
| Shared service accounts | No audit trail per consumer | Per-service identity with unique credentials |
| No rotation policy | Compromised creds persist indefinitely | Automated rotation on schedule |
| Secrets in environment variables on CI | Visible in build logs, process table | Vault Agent or OIDC-based injection |
| Single unseal key holder | Bus factor of 1, recovery blocked | Shamir split (3-of-5) or auto-unseal |
| No audit device configured | Zero visibility into access | Dual audit devices (file + syslog) |
| Wildcard policies (`path "*"`) | Over-permissioned, violates least privilege | Explicit path-based policies per service |
---
## Tools
| Script | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| `vault_config_generator.py` | Generate Vault policy and auth config from application requirements |
| `rotation_planner.py` | Create rotation schedule from a secret inventory file |
| `audit_log_analyzer.py` | Analyze audit logs for anomalies and compliance gaps |
---
## Cross-References
- **env-secrets-manager** — Local `.env` file hygiene, leak detection, drift awareness
- **senior-secops** — Security operations, incident response, threat modeling
- **ci-cd-pipeline-builder** — Pipeline design where secrets are consumed
- **docker-development** — Container secret injection patterns
- **helm-chart-builder** — Kubernetes secret management in Helm charts
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.