run
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/runRun the full AgentHub lifecycle in one command: initialize, capture baseline, spawn agents, evaluate results, and merge the winner.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/runView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "run"
description: "One-shot lifecycle command that chains init → baseline → spawn → eval → merge in a single invocation. Use when the user runs /hub:run or asks to execute a full AgentHub competition end-to-end."
command: /hub:run
---
# /hub:run — One-Shot Lifecycle
Run the full AgentHub lifecycle in one command: initialize, capture baseline, spawn agents, evaluate results, and merge the winner.
## Usage
```
/hub:run --task "Reduce p50 latency" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest bench.py --json" --metric p50_ms --direction lower \
--template optimizer
/hub:run --task "Refactor auth module" --agents 2 --template refactorer
/hub:run --task "Cover untested utils" --agents 3 \
--eval "pytest --cov=utils --cov-report=json" --metric coverage_pct --direction higher \
--template test-writer
/hub:run --task "Write 3 email subject lines for spring sale campaign" --agents 3 --judge
```
## Parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|-----------|----------|-------------|
| `--task` | Yes | Task description for agents |
| `--agents` | No | Number of parallel agents (default: 3) |
| `--eval` | No | Eval command to measure results (skip for LLM judge mode) |
| `--metric` | No | Metric name to extract from eval output (required if `--eval` given) |
| `--direction` | No | `lower` or `higher` — which direction is better (required if `--metric` given) |
| `--template` | No | Agent template: `optimizer`, `refactorer`, `test-writer`, `bug-fixer` |
## What It Does
Execute these steps sequentially:
### Step 1: Initialize
Run `/hub:init` with the provided arguments:
```bash
python {skill_path}/scripts/hub_init.py \
--task "{task}" --agents {N} \
[--eval "{eval_cmd}"] [--metric {metric}] [--direction {direction}]
```
Display the session ID to the user.
### Step 2: Capture Baseline
If `--eval` was provided:
1. Run the eval command in the current working directory
2. Extract the metric value from stdout
3. Display: `Baseline captured: {metric} = {value}`
4. Append `baseline: {value}` to `.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yaml`
If no `--eval` was provided, skip this step.
### Step 3: Spawn Agents
Run `/hub:spawn` with the session ID.
If `--template` was provided, use the template dispatch prompt from `../agenthub/references/agent-templates.md` instead of the default dispatch prompt. Pass the eval command, metric, and baseline to the template variables.
Launch all agents in a single message with multiple Agent tool calls (true parallelism).
### Step 4: Wait and Monitor
After spawning, inform the user that agents are running. When all agents complete (Agent tool returns results):
1. Display a brief summary of each agent's work
2. Proceed to evaluation
### Step 5: Evaluate
Run `/hub:eval` with the session ID:
- If `--eval` was provided: metric-based ranking with `result_ranker.py`
- If no `--eval`: LLM judge mode (coordinator reads diffs and ranks)
If baseline was captured, pass `--baseline {value}` to `result_ranker.py` so deltas are shown.
Display the ranked results table.
### Step 6: Confirm and Merge
Present the results to the user and ask for confirmation:
```
Agent-2 is the winner (128ms, -52ms from baseline).
Merge agent-2's branch? [Y/n]
```
If confirmed, run `/hub:merge`. If declined, inform the user they can:
- `/hub:merge --agent agent-{N}` to pick a different winner
- `/hub:eval --judge` to re-evaluate with LLM judge
- Inspect branches manually
## Critical Rules
- **Sequential execution** — each step depends on the previous
- **Stop on failure** — if any step fails, report the error and stop
- **User confirms merge** — never auto-merge without asking
- **Template is optional** — without `--template`, agents use the default dispatch prompt from `/hub:spawn`
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.