product-discovery
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/product-discoveryValidate product bets before spending delivery resources.
- Facilitates opportunity solution tree mapping and interview synthesis.
- Executes assumption scoring using Python scripts and CSV data.
- Prioritizes experiments by risk level and user evidence certainty.
- Outputs sprint plans with measurable outcomes and daily reviews.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/product-discoveryView on GitHub ↗
--- name: product-discovery description: Use when validating product opportunities, mapping assumptions, planning discovery sprints, or testing problem-solution fit before committing delivery resources. --- # Product Discovery Run structured discovery to identify high-value opportunities and de-risk product bets. ## When To Use Use this skill for: - Opportunity Solution Tree facilitation - Assumption mapping and test planning - Problem validation interviews and evidence synthesis - Solution validation with prototypes/experiments - Discovery sprint planning and outputs ## Core Discovery Workflow 1. Define desired outcome - Set one measurable outcome to improve. - Establish baseline and target horizon. 2. Build Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) - Outcome -> opportunities -> solution ideas -> experiments - Keep opportunities grounded in user evidence, not internal opinions. 3. Map assumptions - Identify desirability, viability, feasibility, and usability assumptions. - Score assumptions by risk and certainty. Use: ```bash python3 scripts/assumption_mapper.py assumptions.csv ``` 4. Validate the problem - Conduct interviews and behavior analysis. - Confirm frequency, severity, and willingness to solve. - Reject weak opportunities early. 5. Validate the solution - Prototype before building. - Run concept, usability, and value tests. - Measure behavior, not only stated preference. 6. Plan discovery sprint - 1-2 week cycle with explicit hypotheses - Daily evidence reviews - End with decision: proceed, pivot, or stop ## Opportunity Solution Tree (Teresa Torres) Structure: - Outcome: metric you want to move - Opportunities: unmet customer needs/pains - Solutions: candidate interventions - Experiments: fastest learning actions Quality checks: - At least 3 distinct opportunities before converging. - At least 2 experiments per top opportunity. - Tie every branch to evidence source. ## Assumption Mapping Assumption categories: - Desirability: users want this - Viability: business value exists - Feasibility: team can build/operate it - Usability: users can successfully use it Prioritization rule: - High risk + low certainty assumptions are tested first. ## Problem Validation Techniques - Problem interviews focused on current behavior - Journey friction mapping - Support ticket and sales-call synthesis - Behavioral analytics triangulation Evidence threshold examples: - Same pain repeated across multiple target users - Observable workaround behavior - Measurable cost of current pain ## Solution Validation Techniques - Concept tests (value proposition comprehension) - Prototype usability tests (task success/time-to-complete) - Fake door or concierge tests (demand signal) - Limited beta cohorts (retention/activation signals) ## Discovery Sprint Planning Suggested 10-day structure: - Day 1-2: Outcome + opportunity framing - Day 3-4: Assumption mapping + test design - Day 5-7: Problem and solution tests - Day 8-9: Evidence synthesis + decision options - Day 10: Stakeholder decision review ## Tooling ### `scripts/assumption_mapper.py` CLI utility that: - reads assumptions from CSV or inline input - scores risk/certainty priority - emits prioritized test plan with suggested test types See `references/discovery-frameworks.md` for framework details.
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.