org-health-diagnostic

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/org-health-diagnostic

Scores organizational health across 8 dimensions with traffic-light ratings and actionable insights

  • Assesses company health for board reviews, risk identification, or growth planning
  • Uses financial, operational, and team metrics from C-suite data
  • Evaluates against real benchmarks to highlight at-risk functions
  • Delivers a dashboard with scores and drill-down recommendations

SKILL.md

.github/skills/org-health-diagnosticView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "org-health-diagnostic"
description: "Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  author: Alireza Rezvani
  category: c-level
  domain: organizational-health
  updated: 2026-03-05
  python-tools: health_scorer.py
  frameworks: health-benchmarks
---

# Org Health Diagnostic

Eight dimensions. Traffic lights. Real benchmarks. Surfaces the problems you don't know you have.

## Keywords
org health, organizational health, health diagnostic, health dashboard, health check, company health, functional health, team health, startup health, health scorecard, health assessment, risk dashboard

## Quick Start

```bash
python scripts/health_scorer.py        # Guided CLI — enter metrics, get scored dashboard
python scripts/health_scorer.py --json # Output raw JSON for integration
```

Or describe your metrics in natural language:

> "Run an org health check" — paste your key metrics or answer prompts
> "Score our [financial|revenue|product|engineering|people|ops|security|market] health" — single-dimension deep dive

## The 8 Dimensions

### 1. 💰 Financial Health (CFO)
**What it measures:** Can we fund operations and invest in growth?

Key metrics:
- **Runway** — months at current burn (Green: >12, Yellow: 6-12, Red: <6)
- **Burn multiple** — net burn / net new ARR (Green: <1.5x, Yellow: 1.5-2.5x, Red: >2.5x)
- **Gross margin** — SaaS target: >65% (Green: >70%, Yellow: 55-70%, Red: <55%)
- **MoM growth rate** — contextual by stage (see benchmarks)
- **Revenue concentration** — top customer % of ARR (Green: <15%, Yellow: 15-25%, Red: >25%)

### 2. 📈 Revenue Health (CRO)
**What it measures:** Are customers staying, growing, and recommending us?

Key metrics:
- **NRR (Net Revenue Retention)** — Green: >110%, Yellow: 100-110%, Red: <100%
- **Logo churn rate (annualized)** — Green: <5%, Yellow: 5-10%, Red: >10%
- **Pipeline coverage (next quarter)** — Green: >3x, Yellow: 2-3x, Red: <2x
- **CAC payback period** — Green: <12 months, Yellow: 12-18, Red: >18 months
- **Average ACV trend** — directional: growing, flat, declining

### 3. 🚀 Product Health (CPO)
**What it measures:** Do customers love and use the product?

Key metrics:
- **NPS** — Green: >40, Yellow: 20-40, Red: <20
- **DAU/MAU ratio** — engagement proxy (Green: >40%, Yellow: 20-40%, Red: <20%)
- **Core feature adoption** — % of users using primary value feature (Green: >60%)
- **Time-to-value** — days from signup to first core action (lower is better)
- **Customer satisfaction (CSAT)** — Green: >4.2/5, Yellow: 3.5-4.2, Red: <3.5

### 4. ⚙️ Engineering Health (CTO)
**What it measures:** Can we ship reliably and sustain velocity?

Key metrics:
- **Deployment frequency** — Green: daily, Yellow: weekly, Red: monthly or less
- **Change failure rate** — % of deployments causing incidents (Green: <5%, Red: >15%)
- **Mean time to recovery (MTTR)** — Green: <1 hour, Yellow: 1-4 hours, Red: >4 hours
- **Tech debt ratio** — % of sprint capacity on debt (Green: <20%, Yellow: 20-35%, Red: >35%)
- **Incident frequency** — P0/P1 per month (Green: <2, Yellow: 2-5, Red: >5)

### 5. 👥 People Health (CHRO)
**What it measures:** Is the team stable, engaged, and growing?

Key metrics:
- **Regrettable attrition (annualized)** — Green: <10%, Yellow: 10-20%, Red: >20%
- **Engagement score** — (eNPS or similar; Green: >30, Yellow: 0-30, Red: <0)
- **Time-to-fill (avg days)** — Green: <45, Yellow: 45-90, Red: >90
- **Manager-to-IC ratio** — Green: 1:5–1:8, Yellow: 1:3–1:5 or 1:8–1:12, Red: outside
- **Internal promotion rate** — at least 25-30% of senior roles filled internally

### 6. 🔄 Operational Health (COO)
**What it measures:** Are we executing our strategy with discipline?

Key metrics:
- **OKR completion rate** — % of key results hitting target (Green: >70%, Yellow: 50-70%, Red: <50%)
- **Decision cycle time** — days from decision needed to decision made (Green: <48h, Yellow: 48h-1w)
- **Meeting effectiveness** — % of meetings with clear outcome (qualitative)
- **Process maturity** — level 1-5 scale (see COO advisor)
- **Cross-functional initiative completion** — % on time, on scope

### 7. 🔒 Security Health (CISO)
**What it measures:** Are we protecting customers and maintaining compliance?

Key metrics:
- **Security incidents (last 90 days)** — Green: 0, Yellow: 1-2 minor, Red: 1+ major
- **Compliance status** — certifications current/in-progress vs. overdue
- **Vulnerability remediation SLA** — % of critical CVEs patched within SLA (Green: 100%)
- **Security training completion** — % of team current (Green: >95%)
- **Pen test recency** — Green: <12 months, Yellow: 12-24, Red: >24 months

### 8. 📣 Market Health (CMO)
**What it measures:** Are we winning in the market and growing efficiently?

Key metrics:
- **CAC trend** — improving, flat, or worsening QoQ
- **Organic vs paid lead mix** — more organic = healthier (less fragile)
- **Win rate** — % of qualified opportunities closed-won (Green: >25%, Yellow: 15-25%, Red: <15%)
- **Competitive win rate** — against primary competitors specifically
- **Brand NPS** — awareness + preference scores in ICP

---

## Scoring & Traffic Lights

Each dimension is scored 1-10 with traffic light:
- 🟢 **Green (7-10):** Healthy — maintain and optimize
- 🟡 **Yellow (4-6):** Watch — trend matters; improving or declining?
- 🔴 **Red (1-3):** Action required — address within 30 days

**Overall Health Score:**
Weighted average by company stage (see `references/health-benchmarks.md` for weights).

---

## Dimension Interactions (Why One Problem Creates Another)

| If this dimension is red... | Watch these dimensions next |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------|
| Financial Health | People (freeze hiring) → Engineering (freeze infra) → Product (cut scope) |
| Revenue Health | Financial (cash gap) → People (attrition risk) → Market (lose positioning) |
| People Health | Engineering (velocity drops) → Product (quality drops) → Revenue (churn rises) |
| Engineering Health | Product (features slip) → Revenue (deals stall on product) |
| Product Health | Revenue (NRR drops, churn rises) → Market (CAC rises; referrals dry up) |
| Operational Health | All dimensions degrade over time (execution failure cascades everywhere) |

---

## Dashboard Output Format

```
ORG HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC — [Company] — [Date]
Stage: [Seed/A/B/C]   Overall: [Score]/10   Trend: [↑ Improving / → Stable / ↓ Declining]

DIMENSION SCORES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💰 Financial    🟢 8.2  Runway 14mo, burn 1.6x — strong
📈 Revenue      🟡 5.8  NRR 104%, pipeline thin (1.8x coverage)
🚀 Product      🟢 7.4  NPS 42, DAU/MAU 38%
⚙️  Engineering  🟡 5.2  Debt at 30%, MTTR 3.2h
👥 People       🔴 3.8  Attrition 24%, eng morale low
🔄 Operations   🟡 6.0  OKR 65% completion
🔒 Security     🟢 7.8  SOC 2 Type II complete, 0 incidents
📣 Market       🟡 5.5  CAC rising, win rate dropped to 22%
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

TOP PRIORITIES
🔴 [1] People: attrition at 24% — engineering velocity will drop in 60 days
   Action: CHRO + CEO to run retention audit; target top 5 at-risk this week
🟡 [2] Revenue: pipeline coverage at 1.8x — Q+1 miss risk is high
   Action: CRO to add 3 qualified opps within 30 days or shift forecast down
🟡 [3] Engineering: tech debt at 30% of sprint — shipping will slow by Q3
   Action: CTO to propose debt sprint plan; COO to protect capacity

WATCH
→ People → Engineering cascade risk if attrition continues (see dimension interactions)
```

---

## Graceful Degradation

You don't need all metrics to run a diagnostic. The tool handles partial data:
- Missing metric → excluded from score, flagged as "[data needed]"
- Score still valid for available dimensions
- Report flags which gaps to fill for next cycle

## References
- `references/health-benchmarks.md` — benchmarks by stage (Seed, A, B, C)
- `scripts/health_scorer.py` — CLI scoring tool with traffic light output

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SkillDescription
a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.