intl-expansion

Name: intl-expansion
Author: alirezarezvani/claude-skills

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/intl-expansion

Develop international market expansion strategies with region-specific insights

Solves problems related to market selection, entry modes, and localization planning
Leverages economic data, regulatory databases, and cultural analytics
Uses weighted scoring matrices and decision trees for market prioritization
Delivers region-specific go-to-market plans and team structure recommendations

SKILL.md

.github/skills/intl-expansionView on GitHub ↗

---
name: "intl-expansion"
description: "International market expansion strategy. Market selection, entry modes, localization, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market by region. Use when expanding to new countries, evaluating international markets, planning localization, or building regional teams."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  author: Alireza Rezvani
  category: c-level
  domain: international-strategy
  updated: 2026-03-05
---

# International Expansion

Frameworks for expanding into new markets: selection, entry, localization, and execution.

## Keywords
international expansion, market entry, localization, go-to-market, GTM, regional strategy, international markets, market selection, cross-border, global expansion

## Quick Start

**Decision sequence:** Market selection → Entry mode → Regulatory assessment → Localization plan → GTM strategy → Team structure → Launch.

## Market Selection Framework

### Scoring Matrix
| Factor | Weight | How to Assess |
|--------|--------|---------------|
| Market size (addressable) | 25% | TAM in target segment, willingness to pay |
| Competitive intensity | 20% | Incumbent strength, market gaps |
| Regulatory complexity | 20% | Barriers to entry, compliance cost, timeline |
| Cultural distance | 15% | Language, business practices, buying behavior |
| Existing traction | 10% | Inbound demand, existing customers, partnerships |
| Operational complexity | 10% | Time zones, infrastructure, payment systems |

### Entry Modes
| Mode | Investment | Control | Risk | Best For |
|------|-----------|---------|------|----------|
| **Export** (sell remotely) | Low | Low | Low | Testing demand |
| **Partnership** (reseller/distributor) | Medium | Medium | Medium | Markets with strong local requirements |
| **Local team** (hire in-market) | High | High | High | Strategic markets with proven demand |
| **Entity** (full subsidiary) | Very high | Full | High | Major markets, regulatory requirement |
| **Acquisition** | Highest | Full | Highest | Fast market entry with existing base |

**Default path:** Export → Partnership → Local team → Entity (graduate as revenue justifies).

## Localization Checklist

### Product
- [ ] Language (UI, documentation, support content)
- [ ] Currency and pricing (local pricing, not just conversion)
- [ ] Payment methods (varies wildly by market)
- [ ] Date/time/number formats
- [ ] Legal requirements (data residency, privacy)
- [ ] Cultural adaptation (not just translation)

### Go-to-Market
- [ ] Messaging adaptation (what resonates locally)
- [ ] Channel strategy (channels differ by market)
- [ ] Local case studies and social proof
- [ ] Local partnerships and integrations
- [ ] Event/conference presence
- [ ] Local SEO and content

### Operations
- [ ] Legal entity (if required)
- [ ] Tax compliance
- [ ] Employment law (if hiring locally)
- [ ] Customer support (hours, language)
- [ ] Banking and payments

## Key Questions

- "Is there pull from the market, or are we pushing?"
- "What's the cost of entry vs the 3-year revenue opportunity?"
- "Can we serve this market from HQ, or do we need boots on the ground?"
- "What's the regulatory timeline? Can we launch before the paperwork is done?"
- "Who's winning in this market and what would it take to displace them?"

## Common Mistakes

| Mistake | Why It Happens | Prevention |
|---------|---------------|------------|
| Entering too many markets at once | FOMO, board pressure | Max 1-2 new markets per year |
| Copy-paste GTM from home market | Assuming buyers are the same | Research local buying behavior |
| Underestimating regulatory cost | "We'll figure it out" | Regulatory assessment BEFORE committing |
| Hiring too early | Optimism | Prove demand before hiring local team |
| Wrong pricing (just converting) | Laziness | Research willingness to pay locally |

## Integration with C-Suite Roles

| Role | Contribution |
|------|-------------|
| CEO | Market selection, strategic commitment |
| CFO | Investment sizing, ROI modeling, entity structure |
| CRO | Revenue targets, sales model adaptation |
| CMO | Positioning, channel strategy, local brand |
| CPO | Localization roadmap, feature priorities |
| CTO | Infrastructure, data residency, scaling |
| CHRO | Local hiring, employment law, comp |
| COO | Operations setup, process adaptation |

## Resources
- `references/market-entry-playbook.md` — detailed entry playbook by market type
- `references/regional-guide.md` — specific considerations for key regions (EU, US, APAC, LATAM)

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Skill	Description
a11y-audit	Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setup	When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creative	When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewer	Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeo	Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-decision-receipts	Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.
agent-designer	Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-harness	Turn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).
agent-launcher-orchestrator	Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
agent-memory	Use when a project's CLAUDE.md has grown past what anyone reads and you want the agent to learn durable facts from its own sessions instead — or when asking why the agent keeps re-learning the same correction, why a remembered rule is wrong, or where a memory line came from. Implements a four-tier store (L0 transcripts / L1 candidates / L2 project context / L3 stable persona) where promotion is earned by recurrence across sessions and days, never by one confident statement, and nothing reaches a committed file without a human adopting it.