extract

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/extract

Extracts a proven pattern into a reusable AI skill

  • Identifies and extracts recurring patterns from user descriptions.
  • Deploys to any project via command line interface (CLI) commands.
  • Decides actions based on the identified pattern's complexity and applicability.
  • Delivers results directly through CLI output or as a packaged skill.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/extractView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "extract"
description: "Turn a proven pattern or debugging solution into a standalone reusable skill with SKILL.md, reference docs, and examples. Use when the user runs /si:extract or asks to package a recurring solution from memory into a skill."
---

# /si:extract — Create Skills from Patterns

Transforms a recurring pattern or debugging solution into a standalone, portable skill that can be installed in any project.

## Usage

```
/si:extract <pattern description>                  # Interactive extraction
/si:extract <pattern> --name docker-m1-fixes       # Specify skill name
/si:extract <pattern> --output ./skills/            # Custom output directory
/si:extract <pattern> --dry-run                     # Preview without creating files
```

## When to Extract

A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these are true:

| Criterion | Signal |
|---|---|
| **Recurring** | Same issue across 2+ projects |
| **Non-obvious** | Required real debugging to discover |
| **Broadly applicable** | Not tied to one specific codebase |
| **Complex solution** | Multi-step fix that's easy to forget |
| **User-flagged** | "Save this as a skill", "I want to reuse this" |

## Workflow

### Step 1: Identify the pattern

Read the user's description. Search auto-memory for related entries:

```bash
MEMORY_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$(pwd | sed 's|/|%2F|g; s|%2F|/|; s|^/||')/memory"
grep -rni "<keywords>" "$MEMORY_DIR/"
```

If found in auto-memory, use those entries as source material. If not, use the user's description directly.

### Step 2: Determine skill scope

Ask (max 2 questions):
- "What problem does this solve?" (if not clear)
- "Should this include code examples?" (if applicable)

### Step 3: Generate skill name

Rules for naming:
- Lowercase, hyphens between words
- Descriptive but concise (2-4 words)
- Examples: `docker-m1-fixes`, `api-timeout-patterns`, `pnpm-workspace-setup`

**Reserved fragments — must NOT appear in the skill name:**
- `claude`
- `anthropic`

For skills about Claude Code itself, use the `cc-` prefix instead:
- ❌ `claude-code-settings` → ✅ `cc-settings`
- ❌ `claude-code-maintenance` → ✅ `cc-maintenance`
- ❌ `claude-mcp-tools` → ✅ `cc-mcp-tools`
- ❌ `claude-plugin-development` → ✅ `cc-plugin-development`

Before writing the skill directory, check the proposed name against this list.
If a reserved fragment is present, transform it (drop the fragment or replace
the `claude*`/`anthropic*` prefix with `cc-`) and confirm with the user.

### Step 4: Create the skill files

**Spawn the `skill-extractor` agent** for the actual file generation.

The agent creates:

```
<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md            # Main skill file with frontmatter
├── README.md           # Human-readable overview
└── reference/          # (optional) Supporting documentation
    └── examples.md     # Concrete examples and edge cases
```

### Step 5: SKILL.md structure

The generated SKILL.md must follow this format:

```markdown
---
name: "skill-name"
description: "<one-line description>. Use when: <trigger conditions>."
---

# <Skill Title>

> One-line summary of what this skill solves.

## Quick Reference

| Problem | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| {{problem 1}} | {{solution 1}} |
| {{problem 2}} | {{solution 2}} |

## The Problem

{{2-3 sentences explaining what goes wrong and why it's non-obvious.}}

## Solutions

### Option 1: {{Name}} (Recommended)

{{Step-by-step with code examples.}}

### Option 2: {{Alternative}}

{{For when Option 1 doesn't apply.}}

## Trade-offs

| Approach | Pros | Cons |
|----------|------|------|
| Option 1 | {{pros}} | {{cons}} |
| Option 2 | {{pros}} | {{cons}} |

## Edge Cases

- {{edge case 1 and how to handle it}}
- {{edge case 2 and how to handle it}}
```

### Step 6: Quality gates

Before finalizing, verify:

- [ ] SKILL.md has valid YAML frontmatter with `name` and `description`
- [ ] `name` matches the folder name (lowercase, hyphens)
- [ ] `name` does NOT contain reserved fragments `claude` or `anthropic` (use `cc-` prefix for Claude Code skills)
- [ ] Description includes "Use when:" trigger conditions
- [ ] Solutions are self-contained (no external context needed)
- [ ] Code examples are complete and copy-pasteable
- [ ] No project-specific hardcoded values (paths, URLs, credentials)
- [ ] No unnecessary dependencies

### Step 7: Report

```
✅ Skill extracted: {{skill-name}}

Files created:
  {{path}}/SKILL.md          ({{lines}} lines)
  {{path}}/README.md         ({{lines}} lines)
  {{path}}/reference/examples.md  ({{lines}} lines)

Install: /plugin install (copy to your skills directory)
Publish: clawhub publish {{path}}

Source: MEMORY.md entries at lines {{n, m, ...}} (retained — the skill is portable, the memory is project-specific)
```

## Examples

### Extracting a debugging pattern

```
/si:extract "Fix for Docker builds failing on Apple Silicon with platform mismatch"
```

Creates `docker-m1-fixes/SKILL.md` with:
- The platform mismatch error message
- Three solutions (build flag, Dockerfile, docker-compose)
- Trade-offs table
- Performance note about Rosetta 2 emulation

### Extracting a workflow pattern

```
/si:extract "Always regenerate TypeScript API client after modifying OpenAPI spec"
```

Creates `api-client-regen/SKILL.md` with:
- Why manual regen is needed
- The exact command sequence
- CI integration snippet
- Common failure modes

## Tips

- Extract patterns that would save time in a *different* project
- Keep skills focused — one problem per skill
- Include the error messages people would search for
- Test the skill by reading it without the original context — does it make sense?

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SkillDescription
a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-decision-receiptsMint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.
agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-harnessTurn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).
agent-launcher-orchestratorUse when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
agent-memoryUse when a project's CLAUDE.md has grown past what anyone reads and you want the agent to learn durable facts from its own sessions instead — or when asking why the agent keeps re-learning the same correction, why a remembered rule is wrong, or where a memory line came from. Implements a four-tier store (L0 transcripts / L1 candidates / L2 project context / L3 stable persona) where promotion is earned by recurrence across sessions and days, never by one confident statement, and nothing reaches a committed file without a human adopting it.