decide
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/decide**Command:** `/cs:decide <memo-path>`
SKILL.md
.github/skills/decideView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "decide"
description: "/cs:decide <memo> — Log a decision to two-layer memory via decision-logger. Approved memo becomes durable; raw transcripts kept for reference. Use when the founder has approved a boardroom memo and the decision must become durable company memory — e.g. right after /cs:boardroom concludes."
---
# /cs:decide — Log the Decision
**Command:** `/cs:decide <memo-path>`
Logs the founder's decision via the `decision-logger` skill. This is the gate where in-session deliberation becomes durable company memory.
## Pipeline Position
```
/cs:office-hours → /cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem
↑ you are here
```
## Two-Layer Memory Model
The `decision-logger` skill maintains two layers:
1. **Raw transcripts** — every boardroom session, every advisor's Phase 2 position, every dissent. Stored under `~/.claude/decisions/raw/`. Reference only, never feeds back automatically.
2. **Approved decisions** — only the founder-signed memos. Stored under `~/.claude/decisions/approved/`. Feeds into future `/cs:office-hours` and `/cs:founder-mode` calls.
This split prevents the system from "remembering" unresolved debates as if they were decisions.
## Input
A board memo file (output of `/cs:boardroom`).
## Workflow
1. Read the memo path
2. Verify it has founder approval (status: APPROVED)
3. Extract structured decision record:
- Decision title
- Date decided
- Option chosen
- Success + kill criteria
- Dissent (preserved)
- Review checkpoint date
4. Append to `~/.claude/decisions/approved/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md`
5. Update the raw transcript pointer
6. If llm-wiki bridge configured, write to vault (`~/company-vault/10-decisions/`)
7. Schedule auto-revisit (90 days)
## Output Record Format
```markdown
# Decision: <title>
**Decided:** YYYY-MM-DD
**By:** <founder name>
**Memo:** <link to boardroom memo>
**Brief:** <link to original brief>
**Review checkpoint:** YYYY-MM-DD (90d default)
## Decision
**Chose:** <option>
**Rejected:** <other options + one-line why>
## Success Criteria (binding)
- <metric, threshold, timeframe>
## Kill Criteria (binding)
- <metric, threshold, action>
## Preserved Dissent
- **<dissenter>:** <unresolved concern>
- (preserved verbatim; dissent never erased)
## Next Action
- `/cs:execute` → 90-day plan due <date>
## Status History
- YYYY-MM-DD: APPROVED
```
## Why Preserved Dissent
The biggest risk in approved decisions is forgetting why someone disagreed. When the kill criteria trigger, the dissent often turns out to have been correct. Preserving it verbatim — not summarized — keeps the company honest at post-mortem time.
## Routing
- `/cs:execute <decision>` — build the 90-day plan
- `/cs:freeze <decision> <days>` — lock if irreversible
- (Auto-scheduled) `/cs:post-mortem <decision>` — at 90-day checkpoint
## Stale-Decision Audit
`cs-chief-of-staff` runs a weekly stale audit:
- Decisions > 90 days without revisit → flag for `/cs:post-mortem`
- Decisions with kill criteria triggered → flag immediately
- Decisions whose company-context.md basis has changed → flag for re-examination
## Related
- Skill: [`decision-logger`](../../../skills/decision-logger/SKILL.md)
- Agent: [`cs-chief-of-staff`](../../agents/cs-chief-of-staff.md)
- Bridge: [`../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md`](../../references/llm-wiki-bridge.md)
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.