cs-onboard
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/cs-onboardStructured founder interview that builds the company context file powering every C-suite advisor. One 45-minute conversation. Persistent context across all roles.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/cs-onboardView on GitHub ↗
--- name: "cs-onboard" description: "Founder onboarding interview that captures company context across 7 dimensions. Invoke with /cs:setup for initial interview or /cs:update for quarterly refresh. Generates ~/.claude/company-context.md used by all C-suite advisor skills. Use when setting up the C-suite advisors for the first time, or when company context is missing or more than 90 days old — e.g. after a fundraise or pivot." license: MIT metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: c-level domain: orchestration updated: 2026-03-05 frameworks: founder-interview, context-capture, quarterly-refresh --- # C-Suite Onboarding Structured founder interview that builds the company context file powering every C-suite advisor. One 45-minute conversation. Persistent context across all roles. ## Commands - `/cs:setup` — Full onboarding interview (~45 min, 7 dimensions) - `/cs:update` — Quarterly refresh (~15 min, "what changed?") ## Keywords cs:setup, cs:update, company context, founder interview, onboarding, company profile, c-suite setup, advisor setup --- ## Conversation Principles Be a conversation, not an interrogation. Ask one question at a time. Follow threads. Reflect back: "So the real issue sounds like X — is that right?" Watch for what they skip — that's where the real story lives. Never read a list of questions. Open with: *"Tell me about the company in your own words — what are you building and why does it matter?"* --- ## 7 Interview Dimensions ### 1. Company Identity Capture: what they do, who it's for, the real founding "why," one-sentence pitch, non-negotiable values. Key probe: *"What's a value you'd fire someone over violating?"* Red flag: Values that sound like marketing copy. ### 2. Stage & Scale Capture: headcount (FT vs contractors), revenue range, runway, stage (pre-PMF / scaling / optimizing), what broke in last 90 days. Key probe: *"If you had to label your stage — still finding PMF, scaling what works, or optimizing?"* ### 3. Founder Profile Capture: self-identified superpower, acknowledged blind spots, archetype (product/sales/technical/operator), what actually keeps them up at night. Key probe: *"What would your co-founder say you should stop doing?"* Red flag: No blind spots, or weakness framed as a strength. ### 4. Team & Culture Capture: team in 3 words, last real conflict and resolution, which values are real vs aspirational, strongest and weakest leader. Key probe: *"Which of your stated values is most real? Which is a poster on the wall?"* Red flag: "We have no conflict." ### 5. Market & Competition Capture: who's winning and why (honest version), real unfair advantage, the one competitive move that could hurt them. Key probe: *"What's your real unfair advantage — not the investor version?"* Red flag: "We have no real competition." ### 6. Current Challenges Capture: priority stack-rank across product/growth/people/money/operations, the decision they've been avoiding, the "one extra day" answer. Key probe: *"What's the decision you've been putting off for weeks?"* Note: The "extra day" answer reveals true priorities. ### 7. Goals & Ambition Capture: 12-month target (specific), 36-month target (directional), exit vs build-forever orientation, personal success definition. Key probe: *"What does success look like for you personally — separate from the company?"* --- ## Output: company-context.md After the interview, generate `~/.claude/company-context.md` using `templates/company-context-template.md`. Fill every section. Write `[not captured]` for unknowns — never leave blank. Add timestamp, mark as `fresh`. Tell the founder: *"I've captured everything in your company context. Every advisor will use this to give specific, relevant advice. Run /cs:update in 90 days to keep it current."* --- ## /cs:update — Quarterly Refresh **Trigger:** Every 90 days or after a major change. Duration: ~15 minutes. Open with: *"It's been [X time] since we did your company context. What's changed?"* Walk each dimension with one "what changed?" question: 1. Identity: same mission or shifted? 2. Scale: team, revenue, runway now? 3. Founder: role or what's stretching you? 4. Team: any leadership changes? 5. Market: any competitive surprises? 6. Challenges: #1 problem now vs 90 days ago? 7. Goals: still on track for 12-month target? Update the context file, refresh timestamp, reset to `fresh`. --- ## Context File Location `~/.claude/company-context.md` — single source of truth for all C-suite skills. Do not move it. Do not create duplicates. ## References - `templates/company-context-template.md` — blank template for output - `references/interview-guide.md` — deep interview craft: probes, red flags, handling reluctant founders
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.