ciso-review
$
npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/ciso-review**Command:** `/cs:ciso-review <plan>`
SKILL.md
.github/skills/ciso-reviewView on GitHub ↗
--- name: "ciso-review" description: "/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 / ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss." --- # /cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:ciso-review <plan>` The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope. ## When to Run - Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data - Before signing a new vendor with data access - Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) - Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries - After any near-miss incident ## The Six CISO Questions ### 1. Threat Model **What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?** - Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege. - Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact. ### 2. Blast Radius **If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?** - Worst case in plain English. - Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE. ### 3. Detection **What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?** - Logs alone are not detection. - Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call. ### 4. Response **Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?** - If no runbook: build one before ship. - If untested: tabletop before ship. ### 5. Regulatory Window **What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?** - GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary. - Pre-write the customer comms template. ### 6. Vendor & Supply Chain **Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?** - Subprocessor list current? - DPAs in place? - Last security review per vendor? ## Workflow ```bash python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py ``` ## Output Format ```markdown # CISO Review: <plan> **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD ## Threat Model - Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description> - Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L - ALE: $X / year ## Blast Radius - Data exposed (worst case): <description> - Users affected: N - Estimated cost: $X ## Detection - MTTD target: X hours - Current MTTD: X hours - Detection rule: <name> ## Response - IR runbook: ✅ / ❌ - Last tabletop: <date> ## Regulatory - Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR - Notification window: X hours/days ## Vendors - New vendors added: N - DPAs signed: N / N - Security reviews complete: N / N ## Verdict 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK ``` ## Routing - `/cs:cto-review` — architecture alignment - `/cs:gc-review` — DPA, regulatory implications - `/cs:decide` — log risk acceptance - `/cs:boardroom` — for CRITICAL risks ## Related - Agent: [`cs-ciso-advisor`](../../agents/cs-ciso-advisor.md) - Skill: [`ciso-advisor`](../../../skills/ciso-advisor/SKILL.md) - Compliance: `../../../../ra-qm-team/` --- **Version:** 1.0.0
More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
- ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
- ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
- adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
- aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
- agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
- agent-protocolInter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
- agent-workflow-designerDesign production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
- agenthubMulti-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- agile-product-ownerAgile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.