azure-cloud-architect

$npx mdskill add alirezarezvani/claude-skills/azure-cloud-architect

Design scalable Azure architectures with cost optimization and infrastructure-as-code templates

  • Solves infrastructure design, cost optimization, and deployment automation for Azure workloads
  • Uses Bicep/ARM templates, Azure DevOps, AKS, App Service, Cosmos DB, and Azure Functions
  • Analyzes requirements including budget, compliance, and scalability to recommend patterns
  • Delivers architecture diagrams, IaC templates, and cost estimates in JSON format

SKILL.md

.github/skills/azure-cloud-architectView on GitHub ↗
---
name: "azure-cloud-architect"
description: "Design Azure architectures for startups and enterprises. Use when asked to design Azure infrastructure, create Bicep/ARM templates, optimize Azure costs, set up Azure DevOps pipelines, or migrate to Azure. Covers AKS, App Service, Azure Functions, Cosmos DB, and cost optimization."
---

# Azure Cloud Architect

Design scalable, cost-effective Azure architectures for startups and enterprises with Bicep infrastructure-as-code templates.

---

## Workflow

### Step 1: Gather Requirements

Collect application specifications:

```
- Application type (web app, mobile backend, data pipeline, SaaS, microservices)
- Expected users and requests per second
- Budget constraints (monthly spend limit)
- Team size and Azure experience level
- Compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001)
- Availability requirements (SLA, RPO/RTO)
- Region preferences (data residency, latency)
```

### Step 2: Design Architecture

Run the architecture designer to get pattern recommendations:

```bash
python scripts/architecture_designer.py \
  --app-type web_app \
  --users 10000 \
  --requirements '{"budget_monthly_usd": 500, "compliance": ["SOC2"]}'
```

**Example output:**

```json
{
  "recommended_pattern": "app_service_web",
  "service_stack": ["App Service", "Azure SQL", "Front Door", "Key Vault", "Entra ID"],
  "estimated_monthly_cost_usd": 280,
  "pros": ["Managed platform", "Built-in autoscale", "Deployment slots"],
  "cons": ["Less control than VMs", "Platform constraints", "Cold start on consumption plans"]
}
```

Select from recommended patterns:
- **App Service Web**: Front Door + App Service + Azure SQL + Redis Cache
- **Microservices on AKS**: AKS + Service Bus + Cosmos DB + API Management
- **Serverless Event-Driven**: Functions + Event Grid + Service Bus + Cosmos DB
- **Data Pipeline**: Data Factory + Synapse Analytics + Data Lake Storage + Event Hubs

See `references/architecture_patterns.md` for detailed pattern specifications.

**Validation checkpoint:** Confirm the recommended pattern matches the team's operational maturity and compliance requirements before proceeding to Step 3.

### Step 3: Generate IaC Templates

Create infrastructure-as-code for the selected pattern:

```bash
# Web app stack (Bicep)
python scripts/bicep_generator.py --arch-type web-app --output main.bicep
```

**Example Bicep output (core web app resources):**

```bicep
@description('The environment name')
param environment string = 'dev'

@description('The Azure region for resources')
param location string = resourceGroup().location

@description('The application name')
param appName string = 'myapp'

// App Service Plan
resource appServicePlan 'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms@2023-01-01' = {
  name: '${environment}-${appName}-plan'
  location: location
  sku: {
    name: 'P1v3'
    tier: 'PremiumV3'
    capacity: 1
  }
  properties: {
    reserved: true // Linux
  }
}

// App Service
resource appService 'Microsoft.Web/sites@2023-01-01' = {
  name: '${environment}-${appName}-web'
  location: location
  properties: {
    serverFarmId: appServicePlan.id
    httpsOnly: true
    siteConfig: {
      linuxFxVersion: 'NODE|20-lts'
      minTlsVersion: '1.2'
      ftpsState: 'Disabled'
      alwaysOn: true
    }
  }
  identity: {
    type: 'SystemAssigned'
  }
}

// Azure SQL Database
resource sqlServer 'Microsoft.Sql/servers@2023-05-01-preview' = {
  name: '${environment}-${appName}-sql'
  location: location
  properties: {
    administrators: {
      azureADOnlyAuthentication: true
    }
    minimalTlsVersion: '1.2'
  }
}

resource sqlDatabase 'Microsoft.Sql/servers/databases@2023-05-01-preview' = {
  parent: sqlServer
  name: '${appName}-db'
  location: location
  sku: {
    name: 'GP_S_Gen5_2'
    tier: 'GeneralPurpose'
  }
  properties: {
    autoPauseDelay: 60
    minCapacity: json('0.5')
  }
}
```

> Full templates including Front Door, Key Vault, Managed Identity, and monitoring are generated by `bicep_generator.py` and also available in `references/architecture_patterns.md`.

**Bicep is the recommended IaC language for Azure.** Prefer Bicep over ARM JSON templates: Bicep compiles to ARM JSON, has cleaner syntax, supports modules, and is first-party supported by Microsoft.

### Step 4: Review Costs

Analyze estimated costs and optimization opportunities:

```bash
python scripts/cost_optimizer.py \
  --config current_resources.json \
  --json
```

**Example output:**

```json
{
  "current_monthly_usd": 2000,
  "recommendations": [
    { "action": "Right-size SQL Database GP_S_Gen5_8 to GP_S_Gen5_2", "savings_usd": 380, "priority": "high" },
    { "action": "Purchase 1-year Reserved Instances for AKS node pools", "savings_usd": 290, "priority": "high" },
    { "action": "Move Blob Storage to Cool tier for objects >30 days old", "savings_usd": 65, "priority": "medium" }
  ],
  "total_potential_savings_usd": 735
}
```

Output includes:
- Monthly cost breakdown by service
- Right-sizing recommendations
- Reserved Instance and Savings Plan opportunities
- Potential monthly savings

### Step 5: Configure CI/CD

Set up Azure DevOps Pipelines or GitHub Actions with Azure:

```yaml
# GitHub Actions — deploy Bicep to Azure
name: Deploy Infrastructure
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

permissions:
  id-token: write
  contents: read

jobs:
  deploy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - uses: azure/login@v2
        with:
          client-id: ${{ secrets.AZURE_CLIENT_ID }}
          tenant-id: ${{ secrets.AZURE_TENANT_ID }}
          subscription-id: ${{ secrets.AZURE_SUBSCRIPTION_ID }}

      - uses: azure/arm-deploy@v2
        with:
          resourceGroupName: rg-myapp-dev
          template: ./infra/main.bicep
          parameters: environment=dev
```

```yaml
# Azure DevOps Pipeline
trigger:
  branches:
    include:
      - main

pool:
  vmImage: 'ubuntu-latest'

steps:
  - task: AzureCLI@2
    inputs:
      azureSubscription: 'MyServiceConnection'
      scriptType: 'bash'
      scriptLocation: 'inlineScript'
      inlineScript: |
        az deployment group create \
          --resource-group rg-myapp-dev \
          --template-file infra/main.bicep \
          --parameters environment=dev
```

### Step 6: Security Review

Validate security posture before production:

- **Identity**: Entra ID (Azure AD) with RBAC, Managed Identity for service-to-service auth — never store credentials in code
- **Secrets**: Key Vault for all secrets, certificates, and connection strings
- **Network**: NSGs on all subnets, Private Endpoints for PaaS services, Application Gateway with WAF
- **Encryption**: TLS 1.2+ in transit, Azure-managed or customer-managed keys at rest
- **Monitoring**: Microsoft Defender for Cloud enabled, Azure Policy for guardrails
- **Compliance**: Azure Policy assignments for SOC 2 / HIPAA / ISO 27001 initiatives

**If deployment fails:**

1. Check the deployment status:
   ```bash
   az deployment group show \
     --resource-group rg-myapp-dev \
     --name main \
     --query 'properties.error'
   ```
2. Review Activity Log for RBAC or policy errors.
3. Validate the Bicep template before deploying:
   ```bash
   az bicep build --file main.bicep
   az deployment group validate \
     --resource-group rg-myapp-dev \
     --template-file main.bicep
   ```

**Common failure causes:**
- RBAC permission errors — verify the deploying principal has Contributor on the resource group
- Resource provider not registered — run `az provider register --namespace Microsoft.Web`
- Naming conflicts — Azure resource names are often globally unique (storage accounts, web apps)
- Quota exceeded — request quota increase via Azure Portal > Subscriptions > Usage + quotas

---

## Tools

### architecture_designer.py

Generates architecture pattern recommendations based on requirements.

```bash
python scripts/architecture_designer.py \
  --app-type web_app \
  --users 50000 \
  --requirements '{"budget_monthly_usd": 1000, "compliance": ["HIPAA"]}' \
  --json
```

**Input:** Application type, expected users, JSON requirements
**Output:** Recommended pattern, service stack, cost estimate, pros/cons

### cost_optimizer.py

Analyzes Azure resource configurations for cost savings.

```bash
python scripts/cost_optimizer.py --config resources.json --json
```

**Input:** JSON file with current Azure resource inventory
**Output:** Recommendations for:
- Idle resource removal
- VM and database right-sizing
- Reserved Instance purchases
- Storage tier transitions
- Unused public IPs and load balancers

### bicep_generator.py

Generates Bicep template scaffolds from architecture type.

```bash
python scripts/bicep_generator.py --arch-type microservices --output main.bicep
```

**Output:** Production-ready Bicep templates with:
- Managed Identity (no passwords)
- Key Vault integration
- Diagnostic settings for Azure Monitor
- Network security groups
- Tags for cost allocation

---

## Quick Start

### Web App Architecture (< $100/month)

```
Ask: "Design an Azure web app for a startup with 5000 users"

Result:
- App Service (B1 Linux) for the application
- Azure SQL Serverless for relational data
- Azure Blob Storage for static assets
- Front Door (free tier) for CDN and routing
- Key Vault for secrets
- Estimated: $40-80/month
```

### Microservices on AKS ($500-2000/month)

```
Ask: "Design a microservices architecture on Azure for a SaaS platform with 50k users"

Result:
- AKS cluster with 3 node pools (system, app, jobs)
- API Management for gateway and rate limiting
- Cosmos DB for multi-model data
- Service Bus for async messaging
- Azure Monitor + Application Insights for observability
- Multi-zone deployment
```

### Serverless Event-Driven (< $200/month)

```
Ask: "Design an event-driven backend for processing orders"

Result:
- Azure Functions (Consumption plan) for compute
- Event Grid for event routing
- Service Bus for reliable messaging
- Cosmos DB for order data
- Application Insights for monitoring
- Estimated: $30-150/month depending on volume
```

### Data Pipeline ($300-1500/month)

```
Ask: "Design a data pipeline for ingesting 10M events/day"

Result:
- Event Hubs for ingestion
- Stream Analytics or Functions for processing
- Data Lake Storage Gen2 for raw data
- Synapse Analytics for warehouse
- Power BI for dashboards
```

---

## Input Requirements

Provide these details for architecture design:

| Requirement | Description | Example |
|-------------|-------------|---------|
| Application type | What you're building | SaaS platform, mobile backend |
| Expected scale | Users, requests/sec | 10k users, 100 RPS |
| Budget | Monthly Azure limit | $500/month max |
| Team context | Size, Azure experience | 3 devs, intermediate |
| Compliance | Regulatory needs | HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 |
| Availability | Uptime requirements | 99.9% SLA, 1hr RPO |

**JSON Format:**

```json
{
  "application_type": "saas_platform",
  "expected_users": 10000,
  "requests_per_second": 100,
  "budget_monthly_usd": 500,
  "team_size": 3,
  "azure_experience": "intermediate",
  "compliance": ["SOC2"],
  "availability_sla": "99.9%"
}
```

---

## Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Do This Instead |
|---|---|---|
| ARM JSON templates for new projects | Verbose, hard to read, no modules | Use Bicep — compiles to ARM, cleaner syntax |
| Storing secrets in App Settings | Secrets visible in portal, no rotation | Use Key Vault references in App Settings |
| Single large AKS node pool | Cannot optimize for different workloads | Use multiple node pools: system, app, jobs |
| Public endpoints on PaaS services | Exposed attack surface | Use Private Endpoints + VNet integration |
| Over-provisioning "just in case" | Wastes budget month one | Start small, use autoscale, right-size monthly |
| Shared resource groups for everything | Blast radius, RBAC nightmares | One resource group per environment per workload |
| No tagging strategy | Cannot track costs or ownership | Tag: environment, owner, cost-center, app-name |
| Using classic resources | Deprecated, limited features | Use ARM/Bicep resources exclusively |

---

## Output Formats

### Architecture Design

- Pattern recommendation with rationale
- Service stack diagram (ASCII)
- Monthly cost estimate and trade-offs

### IaC Templates

- **Bicep**: Recommended — first-party, module support, clean syntax
- **ARM JSON**: Generated from Bicep when needed
- **Terraform HCL**: Multi-cloud compatible using azurerm provider

### Cost Analysis

- Current spend breakdown with optimization recommendations
- Priority action list (high/medium/low) and implementation checklist

---

## Cross-References

| Skill | Relationship |
|-------|-------------|
| `engineering-team/aws-solution-architect` | AWS equivalent — same 6-step workflow, different services |
| `engineering-team/gcp-cloud-architect` | GCP equivalent — completes the cloud trifecta |
| `engineering-team/senior-devops` | Broader DevOps scope — pipelines, monitoring, containerization |
| `engineering/terraform-patterns` | IaC implementation — use for Terraform modules targeting Azure |
| `engineering/ci-cd-pipeline-builder` | Pipeline construction — automates Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions |

---

## Reference Documentation

| Document | Contents |
|----------|----------|
| `references/architecture_patterns.md` | 5 patterns: web app, microservices/AKS, serverless, data pipeline, multi-region |
| `references/service_selection.md` | Decision matrices for compute, database, storage, messaging, networking |
| `references/best_practices.md` | Naming conventions, tagging, RBAC, network security, monitoring, DR |

More from alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SkillDescription
a11y-auditAccessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
ab-test-setupWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
ad-creativeWhen the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
adversarial-reviewerAdversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.
agent-decision-receiptsMint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.
agent-designerUse when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
agent-harnessTurn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).
agent-launcher-orchestratorUse when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
agent-memoryUse when a project's CLAUDE.md has grown past what anyone reads and you want the agent to learn durable facts from its own sessions instead — or when asking why the agent keeps re-learning the same correction, why a remembered rule is wrong, or where a memory line came from. Implements a four-tier store (L0 transcripts / L1 candidates / L2 project context / L3 stable persona) where promotion is earned by recurrence across sessions and days, never by one confident statement, and nothing reaches a committed file without a human adopting it.