statistical-analysis-advisor
$
npx mdskill add aipoch/medical-research-skills/statistical-analysis-advisorSelects optimal statistical tests for research data analysis.
- Guides researchers to choose between T-test and ANOVA methods.
- Requires Python 3.10+ and dataclasses for execution.
- Analyzes data assumptions to determine appropriate test selection.
- Delivers structured recommendations via executable scripts.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/statistical-analysis-advisorView on GitHub ↗
---
name: statistical-analysis-advisor
description: Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based.
license: MIT
author: aipoch
---
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Statistical Analysis Advisor
Intelligent statistical test recommendation engine that guides users through selecting the right statistical methods for their data.
## When to Use
- Use this skill when the task needs Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based.
- Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.
## Key Features
- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.
## Dependencies
See `## Prerequisites` above for related details.
- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `dataclasses`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
- `enum`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
## Example Usage
See `## Usage` above for related details.
```bash
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/statistical-analysis-advisor"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.
## Implementation Details
See `## Workflow` above for related details.
- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.
## Quick Check
Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
```
## Audit-Ready Commands
Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py
```
## Workflow
1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.
## Capabilities
1. **Statistical Test Selection**
- Compares and recommends between T-test, ANOVA, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, etc.
- Considers data type, distribution, sample size, and research question
- Provides decision tree logic for test selection
2. **Assumption Checking**
- Normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov)
- Homogeneity of variance (Levene's test, Bartlett's test)
- Independence verification
- Outlier detection guidance
3. **Power Analysis & Sample Size**
- Effect size estimation (Cohen's d, eta-squared, Cramér's V)
- Sample size calculations for desired power
- Post-hoc power analysis
## Usage
```python
from scripts.main import StatisticalAdvisor
advisor = StatisticalAdvisor()
# Get test recommendation
recommendation = advisor.recommend_test(
data_type="continuous",
groups=2,
independent=True,
distribution="normal"
)
# Check assumptions
assumptions = advisor.check_assumptions(
data=[group1, group2],
test_type="independent_ttest"
)
# Power analysis
power = advisor.calculate_power(
effect_size=0.5,
alpha=0.05,
sample_size=30
)
```
## Input Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|-----------|------|-------------|
| data_type | str | "continuous", "categorical", "ordinal" |
| groups | int | Number of groups/comparison levels |
| independent | bool | Independent or paired/related samples |
| distribution | str | "normal", "non-normal", "unknown" |
| sample_size | int | Current or planned sample size |
## Technical Difficulty: High ⚠️
**Warning**: Statistical recommendations have significant implications for research validity. This skill requires human verification of all recommendations before application in published research.
## References
- See `references/statistical_tests_guide.md` for detailed test selection criteria
- See `references/assumption_tests.md` for assumption checking procedures
- See `references/power_analysis_guide.md` for power calculation methods
## Limitations
- Does not perform actual data analysis (recommendations only)
- Cannot access raw data directly
- Complex multivariate designs may require specialized consultation
- Bayesian alternatives not covered comprehensively
## Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|----------------|------------|-------|
| Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |
| Network Access | No external API calls | Low |
| File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
## Security Checklist
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
- [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
- [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
- [ ] Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
- [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
- [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
- [ ] Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
- [ ] Dependencies audited
## Prerequisites
```text
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
## Evaluation Criteria
### Success Metrics
- [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
- [ ] Output meets quality standards
- [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
- [ ] Performance is acceptable
### Test Cases
1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output
2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time
## Lifecycle Status
- **Current Stage**: Draft
- **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
- **Known Issues**: None
- **Planned Improvements**:
- Performance optimization
- Additional feature support
## Output Requirements
Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:
- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks
## Error Handling
- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If `scripts/main.py` fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
- Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.
## Input Validation
This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of `statistical-analysis-advisor` and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
> `statistical-analysis-advisor` only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
## Response Template
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.
More from aipoch/medical-research-skills
- 3d-molecule-ray-tracerGenerate photorealistic rendering scripts for PyMOL and UCSF ChimeraX.
- abstract-summarizerTransform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.
- abstract-trimmerPrecision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.
- academic-abstract-refinerRefines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.
- academic-cv-generatorGenerate structured academic CVs from free-form Chinese/English text and export to Word (.docx). Use this skill when you are asked to organize, generate, or optimize an academic CV (e.g., publications/projects/awards) into a consistent, formatted document with uniform-colored section headers and optional bilingual output.
- academic-highlight-generatorGenerates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.
- academic-norm-reviewDetects content similarity, verifies standardized citations and abbreviations, and flags potential academic integrity risks; use it before submission, during academic writing QA, or for compliance reviews.
- academic-poster-generatorComplete workflow for generating academic research posters from PDF literature; use when you need to extract paper content from PDFs and produce a LaTeX-based poster (beamerposter/tikzposter/baposter) with mandatory figure generation and a final rendered HTML deliverable.
- acronym-unpackerIntelligent medical abbreviation disambiguation tool that resolves ambiguous acronyms using clinical context, specialty-specific knowledge, and document-level semantic analysis.
- active-comparator-single-soc-faers-safety-comparisonGenerates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.