customer-billing-ops
$
npx mdskill add affaan-m/ECC/customer-billing-opsResolve billing disputes and manage subscriptions via Stripe.
- Diagnose refunds, churn risks, and plan mix issues.
- Connects to Stripe and billing portals for data.
- Classifies problems before recommending fixes.
- Delivers safe, classified recommendations without PII.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/customer-billing-opsView on GitHub ↗
--- name: customer-billing-ops description: Operate customer billing workflows such as subscriptions, refunds, churn triage, billing-portal recovery, and plan analysis using connected billing tools like Stripe. Use when the user needs to help a customer, inspect subscription state, or manage revenue-impacting billing operations. origin: ECC --- # Customer Billing Ops Use this skill for real customer operations, not generic payment API design. The goal is to help the operator answer: who is this customer, what happened, what is the safest fix, and what follow-up should we send? ## When to Use - Customer says billing is broken, they want a refund, or they cannot cancel - Investigating duplicate subscriptions, accidental charges, failed renewals, or churn risk - Reviewing plan mix, active subscriptions, yearly vs monthly conversion, or team-seat confusion - Creating or validating a billing portal flow - Auditing support complaints that touch subscriptions, invoices, refunds, or payment methods ## Preferred Tool Surface - Use connected billing tools such as Stripe first - Use email, GitHub, or issue trackers only as supporting evidence - Prefer hosted billing/customer portals over custom account-management code when the platform already provides the needed controls ## Guardrails - Never expose secret keys, full card details, or unnecessary customer PII in the response - Do not refund blindly; first classify the issue - Distinguish among: - accidental duplicate purchase - deliberate multi-seat or team purchase - broken product / unmet value - failed or incomplete checkout - cancellation due to missing self-serve controls - For annual plans, team plans, and prorated states, verify the contract shape before taking action ## Workflow ### 1. Identify the customer cleanly Start from the strongest identifier available: - customer email - Stripe customer ID - subscription ID - invoice ID - GitHub username or support email if it is known to map back to billing Return a concise identity summary: - customer - active subscriptions - canceled subscriptions - invoices - obvious anomalies such as duplicate active subscriptions ### 2. Classify the issue Put the case into one bucket before acting: | Case | Typical action | |------|----------------| | Duplicate personal subscription | cancel extras, consider refund | | Real multi-seat/team intent | preserve seats, clarify billing model | | Failed payment / incomplete checkout | recover via portal or update payment method | | Missing self-serve controls | provide portal, cancellation path, or invoice access | | Product failure or trust break | refund, apologize, log product issue | ### 3. Take the safest reversible action first Preferred order: 1. restore self-serve management 2. fix duplicate or broken billing state 3. refund only the affected charge or duplicate 4. document the reason 5. send a short customer follow-up If the fix requires product work, separate: - customer remediation now - product bug / workflow gap for backlog ### 4. Check operator-side product gaps If the customer pain comes from a missing operator surface, call it out explicitly. Common examples: - no billing portal - no usage/rate-limit visibility - no plan/seat explanation - no cancellation flow - no duplicate-subscription guard Treat those as ECC or website follow-up items, not just support incidents. ### 5. Produce the operator handoff End with: - customer state summary - action taken - revenue impact - follow-up text to send - product or backlog issue to create ## Output Format Use this structure: ```text CUSTOMER - name / email - relevant account identifiers BILLING STATE - active subscriptions - invoice or renewal state - anomalies DECISION - issue classification - why this action is correct ACTION TAKEN - refund / cancel / portal / no-op FOLLOW-UP - short customer message PRODUCT GAP - what should be fixed in the product or website ``` ## Examples of Good Recommendations - "The right fix is a billing portal, not a custom dashboard yet" - "This looks like duplicate personal checkout, not a real team-seat purchase" - "Refund one duplicate charge, keep the remaining active subscription, then convert the customer to org billing later if needed"
More from affaan-m/ECC
- accessibilityDesign, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA
- agent-architecture-auditFull-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature.
- agent-evalHead-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
- agent-harness-constructionDesign and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
- agent-introspection-debuggingStructured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports.
- agent-payment-x402Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk and X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol.
- agent-sortBuild an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
- agentic-engineeringOperate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
- agentic-osBuild persistent multi-agent operating systems on Claude Code. Covers kernel architecture, specialist agents, slash commands, file-based memory, scheduled automation, and state management without external databases.
- ai-first-engineeringEngineering operating model for teams where AI agents generate a large share of implementation output.