openrlhf-training

$npx mdskill add Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs/openrlhf-training

Trains large RLHF models using OpenRLHF framework with Ray and vLLM acceleration

  • Solves the problem of training large reward and critic networks for reinforcement learning.
  • Depends on Ray, vLLM, torch, transformers, and deepspeed for distributed training.
  • Decides optimal model parameters and hyperparameters through iterative optimization processes.
  • Delivers trained models to users or agents via a high-performance RLHF framework.

SKILL.md

.github/skills/openrlhf-trainingView on GitHub ↗
---
name: openrlhf-training
description: High-performance RLHF framework with Ray+vLLM acceleration. Use for PPO, GRPO, RLOO, DPO training of large models (7B-70B+). Built on Ray, vLLM, ZeRO-3. 2× faster than DeepSpeedChat with distributed architecture and GPU resource sharing.
version: 1.0.0
author: Orchestra Research
license: MIT
tags: [Post-Training, OpenRLHF, RLHF, PPO, GRPO, RLOO, DPO, Ray, vLLM, Distributed Training, Large Models, ZeRO-3]
dependencies: [openrlhf, ray, vllm, torch, transformers, deepspeed]
---

# OpenRLHF - High-Performance RLHF Training

## Quick start

OpenRLHF is a Ray-based RLHF framework optimized for distributed training with vLLM inference acceleration.

**Installation**:
```bash
# Launch Docker container
docker run --runtime=nvidia -it --rm --shm-size="10g" --cap-add=SYS_ADMIN \
  -v $PWD:/openrlhf nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:25.02-py3 bash

# Uninstall conflicts
sudo pip uninstall xgboost transformer_engine flash_attn pynvml -y

# Install OpenRLHF with vLLM
pip install openrlhf[vllm]
```

**PPO Training** (Hybrid Engine):
```bash
ray start --head --node-ip-address 0.0.0.0 --num-gpus 8

ray job submit --address="http://127.0.0.1:8265" \
  --runtime-env-json='{"working_dir": "/openrlhf"}' \
  -- python3 -m openrlhf.cli.train_ppo_ray \
  --ref_num_nodes 1 --ref_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --reward_num_nodes 1 --reward_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --critic_num_nodes 1 --critic_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --actor_num_nodes 1 --actor_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --vllm_num_engines 4 --vllm_tensor_parallel_size 2 \
  --colocate_all_models \
  --vllm_gpu_memory_utilization 0.5 \
  --pretrain OpenRLHF/Llama-3-8b-sft-mixture \
  --reward_pretrain OpenRLHF/Llama-3-8b-rm-700k \
  --save_path ./output/llama3-8b-rlhf \
  --micro_train_batch_size 8 --train_batch_size 128 \
  --micro_rollout_batch_size 16 --rollout_batch_size 1024 \
  --max_epochs 1 --prompt_max_len 1024 --generate_max_len 1024 \
  --zero_stage 3 --bf16 \
  --actor_learning_rate 5e-7 --critic_learning_rate 9e-6 \
  --init_kl_coef 0.01 --normalize_reward \
  --gradient_checkpointing --packing_samples \
  --vllm_enable_sleep --deepspeed_enable_sleep
```

**GRPO Training** (Group Normalized Policy Optimization):
```bash
# Same command as PPO, but add:
--advantage_estimator group_norm
```

## Common workflows

### Workflow 1: Full RLHF pipeline (SFT → Reward Model → PPO)

**Step 1: Train reward model** (DPO):
```bash
deepspeed --module openrlhf.cli.train_rm \
  --save_path ./output/llama3-8b-rm \
  --save_steps -1 --logging_steps 1 \
  --eval_steps -1 --train_batch_size 256 \
  --micro_train_batch_size 1 --pretrain meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B \
  --bf16 --max_epochs 1 --max_len 8192 \
  --zero_stage 3 --learning_rate 9e-6 \
  --dataset OpenRLHF/preference_dataset_mixture2_and_safe_pku \
  --apply_chat_template --chosen_key chosen \
  --rejected_key rejected --flash_attn --gradient_checkpointing
```

**Step 2: PPO training**:
```bash
ray start --head --node-ip-address 0.0.0.0 --num-gpus 8

ray job submit --address="http://127.0.0.1:8265" \
  -- python3 -m openrlhf.cli.train_ppo_ray \
  --ref_num_nodes 1 --ref_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --reward_num_nodes 1 --reward_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --critic_num_nodes 1 --critic_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --actor_num_nodes 1 --actor_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --vllm_num_engines 4 --vllm_tensor_parallel_size 2 \
  --colocate_all_models \
  --pretrain OpenRLHF/Llama-3-8b-sft-mixture \
  --reward_pretrain ./output/llama3-8b-rm \
  --save_path ./output/llama3-8b-ppo \
  --micro_train_batch_size 8 --train_batch_size 128 \
  --micro_rollout_batch_size 16 --rollout_batch_size 1024 \
  --max_epochs 1 --prompt_max_len 1024 --generate_max_len 1024 \
  --zero_stage 3 --bf16 \
  --actor_learning_rate 5e-7 --critic_learning_rate 9e-6 \
  --init_kl_coef 0.01 --normalize_reward \
  --vllm_enable_sleep --deepspeed_enable_sleep
```

### Workflow 2: GRPO training (no critic model needed)

Memory-efficient alternative to PPO:

```bash
ray job submit --address="http://127.0.0.1:8265" \
  -- python3 -m openrlhf.cli.train_ppo_ray \
  --advantage_estimator group_norm \
  --ref_num_nodes 1 --ref_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --reward_num_nodes 1 --reward_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --actor_num_nodes 1 --actor_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
  --vllm_num_engines 4 --vllm_tensor_parallel_size 2 \
  --colocate_all_models \
  --pretrain OpenRLHF/Llama-3-8b-sft-mixture \
  --reward_pretrain OpenRLHF/Llama-3-8b-rm-700k \
  --save_path ./output/llama3-8b-grpo \
  --micro_train_batch_size 8 --train_batch_size 128 \
  --micro_rollout_batch_size 16 --rollout_batch_size 1024 \
  --max_epochs 1 --bf16 \
  --actor_learning_rate 5e-7 \
  --init_kl_coef 0.01 --use_kl_loss --kl_estimator k3 \
  --normalize_reward --no_advantage_std_norm
```

**Key GRPO parameters**:
- `--advantage_estimator group_norm` - Enables GRPO
- `--use_kl_loss` - KL loss from GRPO paper
- `--kl_estimator k3` - Loss function (k2 ≈ k1)
- `--no_advantage_std_norm` - Disables std normalization

### Workflow 3: DPO training (preference optimization)

Simpler alternative without reward model:

```bash
deepspeed --module openrlhf.cli.train_dpo \
  --save_path ./output/llama3-8b-dpo \
  --save_steps -1 --logging_steps 1 \
  --eval_steps -1 --train_batch_size 256 \
  --micro_train_batch_size 2 --pretrain meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B \
  --bf16 --max_epochs 1 --max_len 8192 \
  --zero_stage 3 --learning_rate 5e-7 --beta 0.1 \
  --dataset OpenRLHF/preference_dataset_mixture2_and_safe_pku \
  --apply_chat_template --chosen_key chosen \
  --rejected_key rejected --flash_attn --gradient_checkpointing
```

## When to use vs alternatives

**Use OpenRLHF when**:
- Training large models (7B-70B+) with RL
- Need vLLM inference acceleration
- Want distributed architecture with Ray
- Have multi-node GPU cluster
- Need PPO/GRPO/RLOO/DPO in one framework

**Algorithm selection**:
- **PPO**: Maximum control, best for complex rewards
- **GRPO**: Memory-efficient, no critic needed
- **RLOO**: Modified PPO with per-token KL
- **REINFORCE++**: More stable than GRPO, faster than PPO
- **DPO**: Simplest, no reward model needed

**Use alternatives instead**:
- **TRL**: Single-node training, simpler API
- **veRL**: ByteDance's framework for 671B models
- **DeepSpeedChat**: Integrated with DeepSpeed ecosystem

## Common issues

**Issue: GPU OOM with large models**

Disable model colocation:
```bash
# Remove --colocate_all_models flag
# Allocate separate GPUs for each model
--actor_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
--critic_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
--reward_num_gpus_per_node 8 \
--ref_num_gpus_per_node 8
```

**Issue: DeepSpeed GPU index out of range**

Set environment variable:
```bash
export RAY_EXPERIMENTAL_NOSET_CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=1
```

**Issue: Training instability**

Use Hybrid Engine instead of async:
```bash
--colocate_all_models \
--vllm_enable_sleep \
--deepspeed_enable_sleep
```

Adjust KL coefficient:
```bash
--init_kl_coef 0.05  # Increase from 0.01
```

**Issue: Slow generation during PPO**

Enable vLLM acceleration:
```bash
--vllm_num_engines 4 \
--vllm_tensor_parallel_size 2 \
--vllm_gpu_memory_utilization 0.5
```

## Advanced topics

**Hybrid Engine GPU sharing**: See [references/hybrid-engine.md](references/hybrid-engine.md) for vLLM sleep mode, DeepSpeed sleep mode, and optimal node allocation.

**Algorithm comparison**: See [references/algorithm-comparison.md](references/algorithm-comparison.md) for PPO vs GRPO vs RLOO vs REINFORCE++ benchmarks and hyperparameters.

**Multi-node setup**: See [references/multi-node-training.md](references/multi-node-training.md) for Ray cluster configuration and fault tolerance.

**Custom reward functions**: See [references/custom-rewards.md](references/custom-rewards.md) for reinforced fine-tuning and agent RLHF.

## Hardware requirements

- **GPU**: NVIDIA A100/H100 recommended
- **VRAM**:
  - 7B model: 8× A100 40GB (Hybrid Engine)
  - 70B model: 48× A100 80GB (vLLM:Actor:Critic = 1:1:1)
- **Multi-node**: Ray cluster with InfiniBand recommended
- **Docker**: NVIDIA PyTorch container 25.02+

**Performance**:
- 2× faster than DeepSpeedChat
- vLLM inference acceleration
- Hybrid Engine minimizes GPU idle time

## Resources

- Docs: https://github.com/OpenRLHF/OpenRLHF
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11143
- Examples: https://github.com/OpenRLHF/OpenRLHF/tree/main/examples
- Discord: Community support



More from Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs

SkillDescription
academic-plottingGenerates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.
ara-compilerCompiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a paper or codebase into a structured, machine-executable knowledge package, building an ARA from scratch, or converting research outputs into a falsifiable, agent-traversable form.
ara-research-managerRecords research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.
ara-rigor-reviewerPerforms ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
autogpt-agentsAutonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.
awq-quantizationActivation-aware weight quantization for 4-bit LLM compression with 3x speedup and minimal accuracy loss. Use when deploying large models (7B-70B) on limited GPU memory, when you need faster inference than GPTQ with better accuracy preservation, or for instruction-tuned and multimodal models. MLSys 2024 Best Paper Award winner.
blip-2-vision-languageVision-language pre-training framework bridging frozen image encoders and LLMs. Use when you need image captioning, visual question answering, image-text retrieval, or multimodal chat with state-of-the-art zero-shot performance.
brainstorming-research-ideasGuides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions. Use when exploring new problem spaces, pivoting between projects, or seeking novel angles on existing work.
constitutional-aiAnthropic's method for training harmless AI through self-improvement. Two-phase approach - supervised learning with self-critique/revision, then RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use for safety alignment, reducing harmful outputs without human labels. Powers Claude's safety system.
creative-thinking-for-researchApplies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.