prototype
$
npx mdskill add EpicenterHQ/epicenter/prototypeBuild throwaway prototypes to explore design or logic options
- Solve the problem of validating UI or state logic before full implementation
- Uses terminal apps for logic or UI variations with toggleable designs
- Routes based on whether the question is about logic or visual design
- Delivers interactive prototypes for testing or comparison
SKILL.md
.github/skills/prototypeView on GitHub ↗
--- name: prototype description: 'Build a throwaway prototype to flesh out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches: a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".' metadata: upstream: mattpocock/skills forked: 2026-05-17 --- # Prototype A prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides the shape. ## Pick a branch Identify which question is being answered - from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around: - **"Does this logic / state model feel right?"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper. - **"What should this look like?"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar. The two branches produce very different artifacts - getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype. ## Rules that apply to both 1. **Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such.** Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious - but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure. 2. **One command to run.** Whatever the project's existing task runner supports - `pnpm <name>`, `python <path>`, `bun <path>`, etc. The user must be able to start it without thinking. 3. **No persistence by default.** State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is _checking_, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear "PROTOTYPE - wipe me" name. 4. **Skip the polish.** No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype _runnable_, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast and then delete it. 5. **Surface the state.** After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed. 6. **Delete or absorb when done.** When the prototype has answered its question, either delete it or fold the validated decision into the real code - don't leave it rotting in the repo. ## When done The _answer_ is the only thing worth keeping from a prototype. Capture it somewhere durable (commit message, ADR, issue, or a `NOTES.md` next to the prototype) along with the question it was answering. If the user is around, that capture is a quick conversation; if not, leave the placeholder so they (or you, on the next pass) can fill in the verdict before deleting the prototype.
More from EpicenterHQ/epicenter
- agent-goalWrite `/goal` prompts for long-running agent work in Codex or Claude Code. Use for slash goal, agent goal, durable objective, autonomous coding run.
- approachability-auditReview code as a new TypeScript developer. Use when code feels indirect, clever, hard to follow, or needs a pass on abstractions, names, first-read clarity.
- arktypeArktype: runtime validation, discriminated unions with .merge()/.or(), spread keys. Use when mentioning arktype, type(), union types, command/event schemas.
- attach-primitiveContract and invariants for `attach*` composition primitives in `packages/workspace` (side-effectful building blocks like attachIndexedDb, attachSqlite, attachBroadcastChannel, attachEncryption, attachTable, openCollaboration), and when to use `create*` (pure construction) instead. Use when writing or reviewing an `attach*` or `create*` function, naming a new workspace primitive, composing inside a workspace builder, or deciding whether a primitive registers listeners at call time.
- authEpicenter auth packages: `@epicenter/auth`, `@epicenter/auth-svelte`, OAuth sessions, identity state, auth-owned fetch/WebSocket, and workspace lifecycle binding. Use when editing Epicenter auth clients, session state, hosted sign-in, or auth/workspace integration.
- autumnAutumn billing in Epicenter: `autumn.config.ts`, `autumn-js` credit checks, `atmn` CLI, plan gates, and metered AI usage. Use when changing billing, pricing, credits, plan access, refunds, or usage events.
- better-auth-best-practicesBetter Auth server/client setup: `auth.ts`, generated schema, DB adapters, sessions, cookies, env vars, and plugins. Use when mentioning Better Auth, betterauth, auth handlers, OAuth, email/password, or session configuration.
- better-auth-security-best-practicesBetter Auth security hardening: rate limits, secrets, CSRF, trusted origins, cookies, sessions, OAuth tokens, and audit logging. Use when reviewing auth security, brute-force protection, token handling, or deployment safety.
- change-proposalPresent proposed code changes visually before implementing. Use when: "show me options", "compare approaches", "what should we do", or when changes need before/after comparison.
- claude-code-consultUse this skill when the user asks to consult Claude, ask Claude Code, get another model's take, run a taste check, find cleaner options, or prepare a Claude prompt. Create a bounded second-opinion prompt or run a read-only Claude Code consult, then verify Claude's claims against local files.