testing-strategy
$
npx mdskill add Community-Access/accessibility-agents/testing-strategyEvaluate accessibility test coverage and select appropriate testing methods.
- Determine when automated tools suffice versus manual verification is needed.
- Identify required screen reader and browser combinations for compatibility.
- Generate acceptance criteria templates for specific user story requirements.
- Output structured decision trees and compatibility matrices for teams.
SKILL.md
.github/skills/testing-strategyView on GitHub ↗
---
name: testing-strategy
description: Accessibility testing decision trees, browser/AT compatibility matrices, manual vs. automated test coverage, regression testing patterns, and acceptance criteria templates for user stories.
---
# Testing Strategy Skill
Decision frameworks for accessibility testing — when to use automated tools vs. manual testing, which screen reader + browser combinations to test, and how to write accessibility acceptance criteria.
---
## Automated vs. Manual Testing Coverage
| What Automated Tools Catch (~30-40%) | What Requires Manual Testing (~60-70%) |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Missing alt text on images | Alt text quality and accuracy |
| Missing form labels | Label clarity and helpfulness |
| Color contrast ratios (computed) | Color contrast in context (gradients, images) |
| Missing lang attribute | Correct language identification |
| Duplicate IDs | Logical reading order |
| Missing ARIA roles on custom widgets | Correct ARIA role for the interaction pattern |
| Heading hierarchy violations | Heading text meaningfulness |
| Empty links and buttons | Link/button text descriptiveness |
| Missing table headers | Table caption and header association quality |
| Syntax errors in ARIA | Screen reader announcement correctness |
## Browser + Screen Reader Compatibility Matrix
### Primary Test Combinations (Required)
| Screen Reader | Browser | OS | Priority |
|--------------|---------|-----|----------|
| NVDA | Firefox | Windows | Must test |
| NVDA | Chrome | Windows | Must test |
| JAWS | Chrome | Windows | Must test |
| VoiceOver | Safari | macOS | Must test |
| VoiceOver | Safari | iOS | Must test |
| TalkBack | Chrome | Android | Should test |
### Secondary (Nice to Have)
| Screen Reader | Browser | OS |
|--------------|---------|-----|
| Narrator | Edge | Windows |
| JAWS | Edge | Windows |
## Testing Decision Tree
```text
Is it a new component or page?
├── Yes → Full test coverage (automated + manual)
│ ├── Run axe-core / Lighthouse scan
│ ├── Keyboard-only navigation test
│ ├── Screen reader announcement test (NVDA + VoiceOver minimum)
│ └── Visual check at 200% zoom
└── No → What changed?
├── Colors/styling → Contrast check + visual review
├── Interactive behavior → Keyboard + screen reader test
├── Content/text → Screen reader announcement check
├── Layout/order → Reading order + focus order test
└── Dependencies updated → Regression scan (axe-core)
```
## Regression Testing Patterns
### CI Pipeline Accessibility Gates
1. **axe-core scan**: Run on every PR. Fail on new critical/serious violations.
2. **Baseline management**: Store known issues in `.a11y-baseline.json`. Only fail on **new** issues.
3. **Lighthouse score threshold**: Set minimum accessibility score (e.g., 90). Fail on regression.
4. **Visual regression**: Capture screenshots at 200% zoom. Compare for focus indicator and layout changes.
### Preventing Regressions
- Add accessibility assertions to existing component tests (see `testing-accessibility.instructions.md`)
- Include keyboard navigation in E2E test suites
- Track accessibility score trends over time (not just pass/fail)
## Acceptance Criteria Template
### For User Stories
```text
Given [context],
When [action by keyboard/mouse/screen reader],
Then [accessible outcome]:
- [ ] Component has an accessible name (via label, aria-label, or aria-labelledby)
- [ ] Component has the correct ARIA role
- [ ] Component is reachable and operable by keyboard (Tab, Enter, Space, Escape, Arrows as appropriate)
- [ ] Focus is visible when the component receives focus
- [ ] State changes are announced to screen readers (aria-expanded, aria-selected, aria-checked, etc.)
- [ ] Error messages are associated with their inputs (aria-describedby or aria-errormessage)
- [ ] Content is readable at 200% zoom without horizontal scrolling
- [ ] Color is not the only means of conveying information
```
## Common Testing Tools
| Tool | Type | Best For |
|------|------|----------|
| axe-core / @axe-core/cli | Automated | CI/CD integration, broad violation scan |
| Lighthouse | Automated | Performance + accessibility combined score |
| WAVE | Semi-automated | Visual overlay of accessibility features/issues |
| Accessibility Insights | Semi-automated | FastPass (automated) + Assessment (guided manual) |
| pa11y | Automated | CI/CD, HTML CodeSniffer rules |
| jest-axe | Unit test | Component-level axe scans in jest |
| cypress-axe | E2E test | Page-level axe scans in Cypress |
| playwright + @axe-core/playwright | E2E test | Page-level axe scans in Playwright |
## Screen Reader Testing Quick Reference
### NVDA (Windows)
| Key | Action |
|-----|--------|
| Insert + Space | Toggle focus/browse mode |
| Tab | Move to next focusable element |
| H | Next heading |
| D | Next landmark |
| F | Next form field |
| T | Next table |
| Insert + F7 | Elements list (links, headings, landmarks) |
### VoiceOver (macOS)
| Key | Action |
|-----|--------|
| VO (Ctrl+Option) + Right | Move to next element |
| VO + Space | Activate current element |
| VO + U | Open rotor (navigate by type) |
| VO + Cmd + H | Next heading |
More from Community-Access/accessibility-agents
- Accessibility LeadAccessibility team lead and orchestrator. Use on EVERY task that involves web UI code, HTML, JSX, CSS, React components, web pages, or any user-facing web content. This agent coordinates the accessibility specialist team and ensures no accessibility requirement is missed. Runs the final review before any UI code is considered complete. Applies to any web framework or vanilla HTML/CSS/JS.
- Accessibility Regression DetectorDetects accessibility regressions by comparing audit results across commits/branches. Tracks score trends and validates previous fixes.
- Accessibility Statement GeneratorGenerates conformance/accessibility statements following W3C or EU model templates. Maps audit results to conformance claims, known limitations, and contact information.
- Accessibility Tool BuilderExpert in building accessibility scanning tools, rule engines, document parsers, report generators, and audit automation. WCAG criterion mapping, severity scoring, CLI/GUI scanner architecture, CI/CD integration.
- Accessibility TrackerTrack accessibility improvements across VS Code and any configured repos -- get summaries, deep dives, workspace reports, WCAG cross-references, and proactive alerts on a11y changes.
- accessibility-rulesCross-format document accessibility rule reference with WCAG 2.2 mapping. Use when looking up accessibility rules for Word (DOCX-*), Excel (XLSX-*), PowerPoint (PPTX-*), or PDF (PDFUA.*, PDFBP.*, PDFQ.*) documents, or when mapping findings to WCAG success criteria for compliance reporting.
- Actions ManagerGitHub Actions command center -- view workflow runs, read logs, re-run failed jobs, manage workflows, and debug CI failures entirely from the editor. Bypasses the deeply nested, visually-dependent Actions UI that is largely inaccessible to screen readers.
- Alt Text & HeadingsAlternative text and heading structure specialist for web applications. Use when building or reviewing any page with images, icons, SVGs, videos, figures, charts, or heading hierarchies. Covers meaningful vs decorative images, complex image descriptions, heading levels, document outline, and landmark structure. Can analyze images visually, compare existing alt text against image content, and interactively suggest appropriate alternatives. Applies to any web framework or vanilla HTML/CSS/JS.
- Analytics & InsightsYour GitHub analytics command center -- team velocity, review turnaround, issue resolution metrics, contribution activity, bottleneck detection, and code churn analysis with dual markdown + HTML reports.
- ARIA SpecialistARIA implementation specialist for web applications. Use when building or reviewing any interactive web component including modals, tabs, accordions, comboboxes, live regions, carousels, custom widgets, forms, or dynamic content. Also use when reviewing ARIA usage for correctness. Applies to any web framework or vanilla HTML/CSS/JS.